RoboPIN: Grounded Embodied Reasoning via Pinned Chain-of-Thought

Vision-language models achieve strong general perception but often struggle with the spatial reasoning required for embodied tasks. We present RoboSpatialBrain, our submission to the RoboSpatial Challenge at the Embodied Reasoning in Action Workshop, CVPR 2026, built on RoboBrain2.5-8B-NV. RoboSpatialBrain combines two training-free, inference-time mechanisms: a forced <think> prefix activation strategy paired with a task-specific post-prompt that elicits deliberate reasoning on context and compatibility tasks, and an explicit reference-frame redirection pipeline that resolves camera-centric and object-centric ambiguity for context tasks. We additionally explore fine-tuning RoboBrain2.5 on compatibility data and present a detailed analysis of its interaction with prompting. RoboSpatialBrain achieved first place in the RoboSpatial Challenge, with an overall success rate of 80.9% on RoboSpatial-Home. Code is available at https://github.com/YuxiangXie2003/RoboSpatialBrain.

Despite rapid progress, embodied reasoning under real-world variability remains challenging. Existing approaches rely on demonstration-driven sequential biases, limiting flexibility in open-ended and long-horizon tasks that require structured reasoning over evolving states. We introduce RoBoSR, an intermediate structural representation that formulates manipulation as step-wise state transitions over semantically grounded, object-centric scene graphs. By modeling object states and their spatial relations at the perception-action interface, RoBoSR disentangles high-level task reasoning from raw inputs and enables structured reasoning over preconditions, effects, and goal states. This representation endows the agent with causal reasoning capability, enforcing subtask dependencies and supporting coherent long-horizon task planning. To learn such structure-aware reasoning, we construct Manip-Cognition-1.6M, an open-world dataset that jointly supervises scene understanding, instruction interpretation, and subtask planning across diverse tasks. Across several benchmarks and real-world demonstrations, our method consistently outperforms prompting-based methods and classical TAMP baselines in zero-shot generalization and long-horizon tasks. The results underscore structured intermediate representations as a critical inductive bias for scalable embodied reasoning.

Generalist embodied agents require more than object recognition: they must reason about spatial relations, actions, procedures, human intentions, environmental constraints, and commonsense consequences from situated visual observations. Yet existing visual and embodied question answering benchmarks often provide limited control over the reasoning dependencies being tested, making it difficult to distinguish grounded embodied reasoning from shortcut-driven visual or linguistic pattern matching. We present ERQA-Plus, a diagnostic benchmark for reasoning in embodied AI. ERQA-Plus contains 1,766 question-answer instances grounded in 711 robot-centric images and organized according to a structured taxonomy spanning perceptual, action-centric, social-interaction, navigation-environmental, and contextual commonsense reasoning. The dataset is constructed using a multi-stage generation and validation pipeline that combines taxonomy-guided question generation, automatic quality judging, iterative revision, and human assessment to improve visual grounding, answer validity, and reasoning quality. We benchmark representative general-purpose vision-language models and embodied models, including LLaVA-NeXT-8B, Prismatic-7B, MiniCPM-V-4.5-8B, Qwen3-VL, RoboRefer-8B, and RoboBrain2.5-8B. Although the strongest model, Qwen3-VL-32B, achieves 83.4% overall accuracy and 61.4 SBERT score, category-level results reveal persistent weaknesses in spatial reasoning, procedural reasoning, event prediction, and intention inference. ERQA-Plus therefore provides a fine-grained evaluation framework for measuring not only whether embodied agents answer correctly, but also which forms of embodied reasoning they can and cannot perform reliably. The dataset is available https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingdas/erqa-plus and the project page at https://github.com/LUNAProject22/erqa-plus.