ImageWAM: Do World Action Models Really Need Video Generation, or Just Image Editing?

World Action Models (WAMs) are embodied predictive-action models that make a forecast of the future available to action. Recent WAMs repurpose large video generation models, and a parallel line relies on language or vision-language backbones without a video-generation core. This rapid expansion has blurred the boundary among broad world models, video generation models, action-grounded video world models, Vision-Language-Action policies, and WAMs. This survey gives the field a common account. It first clarifies these boundaries, then organizes existing works through two complementary views. The first view asks what each method is required to generate, spanning rendered futures, latent futures, and video-generation-free action reasoning. The second view decomposes each method by predictive substrate, backbone, action coupling, and deployment regime. This anatomy supports a unified discussion of interactability, causality, persistence, physical plausibility, and generalization, followed by data, evaluation, and open challenges. Across these axes, a consistent design pattern emerges: WAMs are not simply video generators with action heads, but predictive-action methods whose design choices trade representational richness against compute, memory, latency, and action-label cost. The field is moving toward methods that generate less of the future while preserving what control requires. The survey homepage is available at https://world-action-models.github.io/.

World Action Models (WAMs) jointly model action generation and environment dynamics and are mostly built on pretrained Video Diffusion Models (VDMs). In VDM-based WAMs, observations are first encoded by a VAE, and the resulting compressed latents are then processed by large video diffusion backbones to extract effective features for action generation. However, this paradigm ties WAM performance and training cost to large-scale video generation pretraining, limiting WAM efficiency and scalability. In this paper, we theoretically and empirically investigate how visual representations affect action generation in WAMs. Our results show that predictive embeddings from Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) encoders better support action generation than compressed VAE latents, with I-JEPA performing best in our encoder comparison. Based on these findings, we propose LeWAM, which conditions action generation on JEPA embeddings and models environment evolution by predicting future embeddings in the same space, without relying on a video diffusion backbone. We further find that imitation learning matches demonstrated actions but does not distinguish better actions from worse ones, even though small action deviations can greatly affect task success. To address this limitation without additional environment interaction or the human oversight required for resets and safety, we introduce Demonstration-Guided DPO (DemoDPO), an offline preference refinement stage that derives preference supervision directly from demonstrations.With only 0.4B trainable parameters, LeWAM achieves an average success rate of 92.28% on RoboTwin 2.0, comparable to that of state-of-the-art VLAs and WAMs, and maintains practical effectiveness on real-world manipulation tasks.

World Action Models (WAMs) are able to leverage pretrained video generators for both world modeling and action prediction. However, directly leveraging such video generators for control raises a new challenge: how to represent actions in a suitable form that aligns with pretrained video generators while carrying enough motion cues for accurate control. Existing numerical actions fail to satisfy the former, and prior visual action representations overlook the temporal motion structure across frames. We address this issue with FlowWAM, a dual-stream diffusion framework that adopts optical flow as a unified, video-native action representation. Flow videos share the same format as RGB videos and encode rich per-pixel displacement. By jointly modeling them within a shared pretrained video generator, FlowWAM can naturally implement two modes of WAMs. In policy mode, FlowWAM generates flow for action prediction, while in world-model mode, it uses target flow sequences to guide future video generation. Moreover, since flow can be easily extracted from raw videos without action labels, FlowWAM can leverage large-scale action-unlabeled video datasets for pretraining. We empirically find that our flow-based action representation delivers gains across both modes. On RoboTwin manipulation, FlowWAM raises the success rate to 92.94% on the Clean setting and 92.14% on Random, outperforming both VLA and WAM baselines. On WorldArena world modeling, it achieves the best overall EWMScore (63.71) with an 18.4% relative improvement in trajectory accuracy. More results can be found on our project website: https://flow-wam.github.io .