Efficient Neural Network Model Selection for Few-Class Application Datasets

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are widely used for their ability to model complex patterns across domains such as computer vision, speech recognition, and robotics. However, larger models, while often more accurate, are computationally expensive and energy-intensive. Since such a cost is typically needed only for challenging inputs, dynamically selecting lighter models for simpler inputs can improve efficiency with minimal impact on accuracy. We introduce PERTINENCE, a runtime method that selects, from a set of pre-trained models, the lightest model likely to process each input correctly. An ML-based dispatcher performs this selection, and a genetic algorithm explores dispatcher training strategies to identify Pareto-optimal trade-offs between accuracy and computational cost. We evaluate PERTINENCE on CNNs trained on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, ViTs trained on TinyImageNet, and a YOLO-based road occupancy estimation application using real-time intersection camera feeds. Results show that PERTINENCE matches or improves the accuracy of state-of-the-art pre-trained models while reducing operations by up to 36%, with equivalent or lower end-to-end inference time through tunable invocation intervals.

Newer lightweight convolutional neural networks are often presented as improving predictive performance and deployment efficiency, but such claims require controlled evaluation. This study compares nine lightweight CNN model packages across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet under a shared downstream protocol. We report top-1 accuracy, macro F1, top-5 accuracy, parameter count, FP32 storage, GMACs, batch-size-1 latency on an NVIDIA L4 and AMD Ryzen 5 5500U CPU, peak PyTorch CUDA allocated tensor memory, and point estimate Pareto frontiers. EfficientNetV2-S achieves the highest observed top-1 accuracy on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 at 97.57% and 86.98%, while RepViT-M1.0 leads Tiny ImageNet at 79.87%. EfficientNet-B0 remains within 0.22, 0.85, and 1.79 percentage points of the best result on the three datasets while using approximately 79% fewer parameters and 86% fewer GMACs than EfficientNetV2-S. It also appears on every evaluated accuracy and resource Pareto frontier, making it the most consistently competitive intermediate-budget option. MobileNetV3-Small has the lowest GMAC count, is the fastest model under both CPU thread settings, and records higher observed accuracy than MobileNetV4-Conv-S on all three datasets. Under random initialization, it leads MobileNetV4-Conv-S by 2.55, 1.76, and 0.99 points, with paired test-set intervals excluding zero for the fixed trained models. EfficientNet-B0 remains 3.29, 10.10, and 17.54 points below its pretrained counterpart after 100 epochs of scratch training, despite requiring about five times the recorded training time. SqueezeNet1.1 has the fewest parameters and lowest peak CUDA allocation, but substantially weaker accuracy. Latency rankings differ sharply between the L4 and CPU environments, showing that GMACs alone do not predict measured inference performance. Overall, newer designs provide selective rather than universal gains

Lightweight convolutional neural networks are often compared using results obtained with different training recipes, input settings, and pretrained checkpoints. Such differences make architecture rankings difficult to interpret. This study presents a controlled benchmark of seven established CNNs across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet under a shared fine tuning protocol. The evaluation reports top-1 accuracy, macro F1, top-5 accuracy, parameter count, FP32 parameter storage, and multiply accumulate operations. EfficientNetV2-S records the highest observed top-1 accuracy on all three datasets, reaching 97.57%, 86.98%, and 78.73%. EfficientNet-B0 remains within 0.85 percentage points of EfficientNetV2-S across the three datasets while requiring only about 21% of its parameters and 14% of its multiply accumulate operations on Tiny ImageNet. It therefore offers a favorable general balance between predictive performance and computational demand. MobileNetV3-Small is a strong candidate for ultra low resource settings. It uses about 40% of the parameters and 15% of the multiply accumulate operations of EfficientNet-B0 while retaining competitive accuracy. A matched comparison of ImageNet pretrained and randomly initialized EfficientNet-B0 and MobileNetV3-Small models shows that the pretrained advantage is substantially larger on CIFAR-100 and Tiny ImageNet than on CIFAR-10 under the fixed protocol. The results provide a focused reference for selecting established lightweight CNNs when predictive quality, parameter storage, and theoretical computation must be considered together.