cs.LGJul 2, 2026

Do Newer Lightweight CNNs Perform Better Under Resource Constraints? A Controlled Multigenerational Study of Architecture, Initialization, Training Budget, and Efficiency

Authors: Tasnim Shahriar

Organizations: Independent Researcher

Abstract

Newer lightweight convolutional neural networks are often presented as improving predictive performance and deployment efficiency, but such claims require controlled evaluation. This study compares nine lightweight CNN model packages across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet under a shared downstream protocol. We report top-1 accuracy, macro F1, top-5 accuracy, parameter count, FP32 storage, GMACs, batch-size-1 latency on an NVIDIA L4 and AMD Ryzen 5 5500U CPU, peak PyTorch CUDA allocated tensor memory, and point estimate Pareto frontiers. EfficientNetV2-S achieves the highest observed top-1 accuracy on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 at 97.57% and 86.98%, while RepViT-M1.0 leads Tiny ImageNet at 79.87%. EfficientNet-B0 remains within 0.22, 0.85, and 1.79 percentage points of the best result on the three datasets while using approximately 79% fewer parameters and 86% fewer GMACs than EfficientNetV2-S. It also appears on every evaluated accuracy and resource Pareto frontier, making it the most consistently competitive intermediate-budget option. MobileNetV3-Small has the lowest GMAC count, is the fastest model under both CPU thread settings, and records higher observed accuracy than MobileNetV4-Conv-S on all three datasets. Under random initialization, it leads MobileNetV4-Conv-S by 2.55, 1.76, and 0.99 points, with paired test-set intervals excluding zero for the fixed trained models. EfficientNet-B0 remains 3.29, 10.10, and 17.54 points below its pretrained counterpart after 100 epochs of scratch training, despite requiring about five times the recorded training time. SqueezeNet1.1 has the fewest parameters and lowest peak CUDA allocation, but substantially weaker accuracy. Latency rankings differ sharply between the L4 and CPU environments, showing that GMACs alone do not predict measured inference performance. Overall, newer designs provide selective rather than universal gains

Explore similar work

CardsList
May 6, 2025cs.CV

Comparative Analysis of Lightweight CNNs for Resource-Constrained Devices: Predictive Performance, Efficiency Trade-offs, and Initialization Effects

Lightweight convolutional neural networks are often compared using results obtained with different training recipes, input settings, and pretrained checkpoints. Such differences make architecture rankings difficult to interpret. This study presents a controlled benchmark of seven established CNNs across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet under a shared fine tuning protocol. The evaluation reports top-1 accuracy, macro F1, top-5 accuracy, parameter count, FP32 parameter storage, and multiply accumulate operations. EfficientNetV2-S records the highest observed top-1 accuracy on all three datasets, reaching 97.57%, 86.98%, and 78.73%. EfficientNet-B0 remains within 0.85 percentage points of EfficientNetV2-S across the three datasets while requiring only about 21% of its parameters and 14% of its multiply accumulate operations on Tiny ImageNet. It therefore offers a favorable general balance between predictive performance and computational demand. MobileNetV3-Small is a strong candidate for ultra low resource settings. It uses about 40% of the parameters and 15% of the multiply accumulate operations of EfficientNet-B0 while retaining competitive accuracy. A matched comparison of ImageNet pretrained and randomly initialized EfficientNet-B0 and MobileNetV3-Small models shows that the pretrained advantage is substantially larger on CIFAR-100 and Tiny ImageNet than on CIFAR-10 under the fixed protocol. The results provide a focused reference for selecting established lightweight CNNs when predictive quality, parameter storage, and theoretical computation must be considered together.
Tasnim Shahriar
Mobilenetv2Efficientnet EncoderConvolutional Neural NetworksResource-Constrained Edge DevicesImagenet
AskPDF
May 21, 2026cs.CV

Slimmable ConvNeXt: Width-Adaptive Inference for Efficient Multi-Device Deployment

Deploying vision models across devices with varying resource constraints, or even on a single device where available compute fluctuates due to battery state, thermal throttling, or latency deadlines, typically requires training and maintaining separate models. Width-adaptive inference addresses this by training a single set of shared weights containing multiple nested subnetworks of increasing capacity, but prior CNN-based approaches required switchable batch normalization, while recent scalable methods have focused on Vision Transformers. We present Slimmable ConvNeXt, which shows that ConvNeXt's modern design, specifically LayerNorm and inverted bottlenecks, makes it particularly suited for channel-width slimming, eliminating the normalization overhead of classical slimmable networks and producing a simpler training pipeline than both prior CNN and ViT approaches. On ImageNet-1k, Slimmable ConvNeXt-T with 3 subnetworks achieves 80.8% top-1 accuracy at 4.5 GMACs and 77.4% at 1.2 GMACs, trained from scratch for 600 epochs. At comparable compute, this exceeds HydraViT's 6-head subnetwork (78.4% at 4.6 GMACs) by 2.4 percentage points and its 3-head configuration (73.0% at 1.3 GMACs) by 4.4 percentage points, while also outperforming MatFormer-S (78.6%) and SortedNet-S (78.2%) at the same GMACs. Scaling to Slimmable ConvNeXt-B further improves maximum accuracy to 82.8% at 15.35 GMACs.
Janek Haberer, Jon Eike Wilhelm, Olaf Landsiedel
Mobilenetv2Resnet-18Vision TransformerRobotwin
AskPDF
Jun 18, 2026cs.LG

Efficient Neural Network Model Selection for Few-Class Application Datasets

While much effort has focused on developing and benchmarking high-performance neural networks, less attention has been given to how dataset properties, known to practitioners, can guide efficient model selection. Neural models are typically evaluated on datasets with thousands of classes, yet many real-world applications involve fewer than ten. To address this understudied but common setting, we develop a measure of classification difficulty based on data-side properties and show how it enables more efficient model selection for few-class datasets, where traditional approaches are less effective. We term this phenomenon "few-class distinctiveness". Our metric allows comparison of models and datasets 6 to 29×\times faster than repeated training and testing. Leveraging this insight, we extend scaled model families below the smallest published models, achieving greater efficiency at similar accuracy, for example models up to 42% smaller than YOLOv5-nano for a mobile robot task. Targeting resource-constrained applications, we demonstrate few-class model selection across mobile robot, drone, and IoT scenarios, highlighting practical gains in efficiency without sacrificing performance.
Bryan Bo Cao, Abhinav Sharma, Lawrence O'Gorman +2
Yolov8-Nano ModelModel SelectionNeural NetworkMultimodal Dataset
AskPDF