Evaluation of Image Matching for Art Skills Assessment

As digital drawings are increasingly shared online, reliable authorship verification has become important for protecting artists and resolving disputes. Yet when authorship is questioned, verification may have to rely only on the disputed drawing and reference drawings known to be created by the claimed artist. This setting is challenging for two reasons. First, artist-specific drawing behavior, such as pen pressure and movement speed, is informative but is not available from a completed drawing. Second, similarities in the depicted object or scene can obscure similarities arising from the artist. We propose IDraw, a framework that learns from drawings paired with tablet-pen sensor signals collected from separate training artists. This allows IDraw to infer drawing behavior from completed images during a later authorship dispute, without requiring sensor data from the artist being verified. IDraw also reduces the influence of drawing content by identifying information shared by drawings of the same object across different artists and suppressing it before comparing drawings. To support this approach, we construct the first multimodal dataset for digital drawing authorship verification, containing 1,110 drawings from 37 artists and 14 types of tablet-pen sensor signals. Evaluated on previously unseen artists across nine image-encoder backbones, IDraw consistently outperforms standard image-based verification and reduces verification error by up to 40%. These results demonstrate that inferring drawing behavior from completed images and suppressing drawing content improve digital drawing authorship verification.

Achieving high levels of surgical skill through effective training is essential for optimal patient outcomes. Automated, data-driven skill assessment holds significant potential to improve surgical training. While machine learning-based methods are increasingly popular for assessing skills in minimally invasive surgery, their application to open surgery remains limited. We present the results of a dedicated MICCAI challenge designed to benchmark and advance vision-based skill assessment in open surgery. The challenge dataset comprises videos of an open suturing training task recorded with a static GoPro camera in a dry-lab setting, with instrument trajectories available in addition to the primary video modality. The OSS Challenge was hosted over two consecutive years, comprising two and three independent tasks, respectively: (1) classifying skill level into four classes, (2) predicting the full Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills across eight categories, and (3) tracking hands and surgical tools. Participants submitted diverse solutions including deep learning-based video models, tracking-driven methods, and hybrid approaches. General-purpose spatiotemporal video models consistently achieved the strongest performance, though conceptually diverse approaches reached competitive levels when well-executed. Predicting fine-grained OSATS scores remains challenging but benefits substantially from increased training data. Keypoint tracking proves difficult given frequent occlusions and out-of-frame instances, limiting current applicability for motion-based skill analysis. This work benchmarks innovative and diverse solutions for surgical skill assessment, highlighting both the promise and current limitations of video-based evaluation in open surgery and identifying critical directions for advancing automated skill assessment toward clinical impact.

Objective assessment of surgical technical skill is important for surgical training and structured feedback, but current workflows remain dependent on labor-intensive expert review. Existing automated approaches primarily focus on visual inputs and provide limited support for jointly studying operative performance, structured skill scores, and evaluator feedback. We introduce SurgSkill-Bench, an initial video-score-text benchmark-style dataset containing 214 surgical training simulation videos, six-dimensional OSATS scores, and expert free-text comments. We define two evaluation settings: video-only OSATS prediction for automated assessment and post hoc expert-comment-assisted prediction, where evaluator comments are available as auxiliary information. We provide controlled baseline experiments using representative frozen visual backbones, content-adaptive key-frame sampling, and a simple video-text co-attention fusion module. Under internal video-level validation, content-adaptive sampling improves video-only performance in this dataset, while evaluator comments provide additional score-related signal in the assisted setting. The best mean AUROC reaches 0.88 under dataset-specific median dichotomization. We further discuss evaluation constraints related to dataset scale, metadata completeness, and the interpretation of comment-assisted prediction. Code will be released publicly at a later date.