cs.CVJun 18, 2026

Translating Inference-Time Control to Radiology Vision-Language Models: Activation Steering for Pneumonia Classification on Chest X-rays

Authors: Eduardo Moreno Judice de Mattos Farina, Mateus A. Esmeraldo, Felipe Akio Matsuoka, Paulo Eduardo de Aguiar Kuriki, Felipe Campos Kitamura

Abstract

Inference-time engineering can alter model behavior without fine-tuning. However, its utility for improving diagnostic performance in medical vision-language models (VLMs) remains unclear. We aim to evaluate whether Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA) can improve pneumonia classification in chest radiograph VLMs without updating model weights. Three frozen chest radiograph VLMs (MedGemma-4B-IT, NV-Reason-CXR-3B, and CheXOne-3B) were evaluated on the public Kermany pneumonia test set. Classification was based on the logits of the tokens Yes and No under a binary prompt. Steering vectors included a 30-pair answer-bias control, a 30-pair pneumonia text contrast, and an image-conditioned contrast derived from 30 pneumonia and 30 normal development images. A deterministic 200-image development set was used for layer and scale selection (100 images) and threshold calibration (100 images). Performance was assessed using ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, F1 score, threshold analyses, reverse-vector controls, random-vector controls, and conditional bootstrap confidence intervals. Fixed-threshold F1 improvements were frequently observed but did not consistently indicate improved diagnostic performance. For MedGemma-4B-IT. NV-Reason-CXR-3B showed the strongest benefit: calibrated F1 improved from 0.7692 in the zero-shot setting to 0.8619 with pneumonia-text steering and to 0.8727 with image-conditioned steering. For CheXOne-3B, pneumonia-text steering increased calibrated F1 from 0.8528 to 0.8666, although the confidence interval crossed zero. On this public pneumonia benchmark, CAA substantially altered prediction score distributions and operating characteristics without fine-tuning. Meaningful performance gains were observed in one of three evaluated VLMs, suggesting that activation steering may serve as a lightweight approach for adapting medical VLM behavior.

Explore similar work

CardsList
May 24, 2026cs.CV

Universal Boosts, Specific Suppressors: Sparse Autoencoder Steering of Medical Vision-Language Models

Medical vision-language models (VLMs) often hallucinate findings when generating chest X-ray reports: they fabricate findings that are not present in the image, miss important ones, or locate them incorrectly. We mitigate this without weight updates by decoding-time residual steering on a per-token sparse autoencoder (SAE) basis: Top-KK SAEs on late layers, causal steering against clinical errors, then combined suppress/boost intervention at inference time. On the MIMIC-CXR test split, our inference-only method improves the quality of generated reports for three radiology VLMs (RadVLM, LLaVA-Rad, and CheXOne), with relative improvements of +5.4%, +7.2%, and +17.0% in the clinical composite metric, and statistically significant GREEN gains on all backbones. A cross-model feature alignment shows that the quality-promoting (boost) directions overlap strongly across architectures, whereas hallucination-linked (suppress) directions are model-specific. Therefore, transferable steering must treat suppression per-backbone, rather than sharing a universal suppress list. The same recipe transfers zero-shot to IU-Xray (Green +7.7%+7.7\% rel.) without retraining, confirming that the identified features are properties of the model, not of the training corpus. We release causal feature sets and an interactive feature dashboard: https://cxr-sparse-feature-dashboard.netlify.app/.
Farhad Nooralahzadeh, Benjamin Gundersen, Nicolas Deperrois +7
Medical Vision-Language ModelsImproving Sparse AutoencodersAttention-Guided TransunetSteering
AskPDF
Jun 16, 2026cs.CV

Vision-language models for chest radiography do not always need the image

Medical vision-language models report strong chest radiograph accuracy, and this is increasingly read as evidence that they use the image. That inference is unsafe: a model exploiting finding-name priors scores like one that reads the scan, and no standard benchmark separates them. We introduce a causal audit that intervenes on the image, occluding the relevant region, occluding an irrelevant one, and swapping in another patient's same-label scan, and combines three behavioral metrics to test whether a correct answer depends on the image. Across nine systems, a text-only model with no image access reaches within 5.7 accuracy points of the best multimodal one, and a 119-billion-parameter multimodal model is statistically indistinguishable from a 7-billion text-only baseline. The audit splits the cohort into three models that ignore the image, one that is unstable, and five that use it selectively, for a subset of findings; the categories hold across a second dataset, resolution, and prompt phrasing. Against board-certified radiologists, a text-only model is statistically indistinguishable from a radiologist's accuracy while grounding at zero, whereas the image-using models ground at radiologist-comparable rates. Reported confidence flags ungrounded answers only when a model uses the image. Grounding audits, not accuracy, should gate clinical deployment.
Mahshad Lotfinia, Sebastian Ziegelmayer, Lisa Adams +3
Chest X-RayMedical Vision-Language ModelsMultimodal Clinical DataAuc-RocAlgorithm Auditing
AskPDF
Jul 20, 2026cs.CV

Attention Without Grounding: Causal Evaluation of Visual Explanations in Medical VLMs

Attention and saliency heatmaps are widely used to explain medical Vision-Language Model (VLM) outputs on chest X-rays, yet whether they truly highlight the image evidence driving predictions has not been causally tested. We audit faithfulness via overlap with radiologist bounding boxes on PadChest (n=637), attribution mass within radiologist masks on CheXlocalize (n=643), and 16x16 patch-occlusion maps that record which regions, when hidden, change the answer. We study three MedGemma-4B variants, cross-family probes on LLaVA-RAD and Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct, and the specialist CheXagent-2-3b, with two CXR-trained classifiers (DenseNet121, ResNet50) as positive controls. A heatmap is faithful only if the model uses the image and attention concentrates on regions whose occlusion alters the prediction. No evaluated VLM meets both criteria. MedGemma and Qwen3-VL use the image, but attention anti-correlates with patch-occlusion importance (rho < 0 with 95% bootstrap CIs below zero). LLaVA-RAD's attention correlates positively, but the model is almost text-only (99.1% text-only agreement, near-zero causal mass), so correlation ties two near-zero signals. Attention also misses annotated anatomy: overlap with true regions never beats shifted or random controls, and no method places more than 22% of its mass inside radiologist masks. The two CXR classifiers pass all metrics, indicating the failure is specific to VLM heatmaps, not the evaluation. These heatmaps are visually reassuring but not faithful; clinical explanations require controlled localization metrics and causal perturbation, not visual inspection alone.
Binesh Sadanandan, Vahid Behzadan
Medical Vision-Language ModelsConcept-Based ExplainabilitySaliencyVisual GroundingDiverse Occlusion-And-Revelation ScenariosCorrelates
AskPDF