Breast arterial calcification (BAC) on screening mammograms is an emerging cardiovascular risk biomarker, but quantitative use requires reproducible segmentation and expert pixel-level labels are costly. We present BAC-JEPA, a label-efficient segmentation framework trained on procedurally generated arterial calcification inserted into real mammographic backgrounds with exact masks. Candidate backgrounds were selected from model-screened mammograms with low predicted BAC response; the generator samples arterial structure, disease burden, radiographic appearance, and hard-negative distractors including nonarterial calcifications and metallic objects. Synthetic masks are paired with mammography self-supervised Vision Transformer encoders and a high-resolution convolutional decoder to produce full-resolution segmentation maps. The study used 75,472 mammography studies from 34,956 patients for background selection and representation learning, trained on synthetic images from 10,000 backgrounds, selected checkpoints with 1,000 development backgrounds, and evaluated transfer on all 1,000 human-labeled BacSeg synthetic 2D mammograms. On held-out synthetic validation data, the larger backbone achieved IoU 0.5325 and Dice 0.6357. On BacSeg, image-level classification from segmentation probability maps reached AUROC 0.8719, with 0.8547 for the smaller backbone. Four-view inference required 110.68--213.63 ms on an RTX 5090 GPU, and severe-preset synthetic image generation averaged 2.7071 s per image on a multicore workstation. These results indicate that BAC-specific synthetic supervision can produce useful image-level transfer without human pixel-level training masks, while expert-reviewed real-mammogram segmentation remains necessary for clinical validation and calibration.
Deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have shown strong performance in breast cancer diagnosis, particularly for classification tasks in mammography. However, domain shifts across multi-site datasets remain a challenge, especially when models are applied to unseen domains. In this work, we proposed a calcification classification framework to improve malignant versus benign breast disease classification across multi-site mammography datasets. The framework consisted of two components: (1) an unsupervised domain adaptation module based on style transfer models (AdaIN and CycleGAN) to generate vendor-specific and technique-specific training samples without additional annotations, and (2) a supervised classification module using Swin Transformer V2 as the backbone. We evaluated the proposed method on three datasets: cross-validation on OPTIMAM (National Health Service, United Kingdom; n=2994), followed by external validation on EMBED (Emory University; n=125), and Duke Calcification Dataset v1 (n=788). These datasets cover multiple vendors and include both full-field digital mammography and synthetic 2D images derived from digital breast tomosynthesis. The proposed framework improved cross-site performance for both EMBED (AUC 0.68 to 0.72) and the Duke Calcification Dataset (AUC 0.68 to 0.73). These findings indicate that domain adaptation can reduce domain shifts and improve the generalization for calcification classification across multi-site datasets.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death among women, yet cardiovascular risk assessment often relies on clinical variables that may be missing, outdated, or unavailable in routine care. Screening mammography offers an opportunity for opportunistic cardiovascular risk stratification because it is routinely acquired and contains vascular features, including breast arterial calcifications (BAC), that are associated with cardiovascular risk and events. We evaluate whether mammography specific foundation models, originally pretrained for breast cancer-related tasks, can transfer to cardiovascular risk prediction without cardiovascular specific supervision or explicit BAC annotation. We constructed a 5-year major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) cohort of 22,497 women linked to electronic health record outcomes, including 500 events (2.22% prevalence). The foundation models achieved AUROCs of 0.823 and 0.822 substantially exceeding an age-only model (AUROC 0.765), despite using only the screening mammogram as input, with no clinical variables. Both foundation models evaluated assigned substantially higher predicted risk to patients with radiologist-documented BAC, despite BAC never being used as a training label, and showed activation patterns consistent with vascular findings. Together, these findings suggest that mammography foundation models can recover clinically relevant cardiovascular risk information directly from mammographic pixels and suggest that screening mammography may provide an opportunistic source of cardiovascular risk information to complement conventional clinical assessment without additional imaging. Code is available in https://github.com/PauFeld/MammoCVD
We developed an anatomy-aware deep learning framework to synthesize post-contrast breast MRI from pre-contrast images, emphasizing tumor and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) regions. This retrospective study included 649 patients with 6,251 paired pre-contrast and post-contrast images. The framework integrates breast mask consistency, lesion-region supervision, and BPE-region supervision into an image-to-image translation model. Evaluation included quantitative image quality metrics, a reader study with two breast radiologists, and downstream Ki-67 classification. The proposed method outperformed Pix2Pix, Pix2PixHD, diffusion-based synthesis, and mask-supervised baselines in whole-image and regional evaluations. Ki-67 classification showed no statistically significant performance differences across real- and synthetic-image training and testing settings, although this does not establish equivalence. These findings suggest that anatomy-aware supervision improves synthesis fidelity and support further investigation of synthetic post-contrast MRI for contrast-free imaging workflows.