eess.IVSep 16, 2026

Mammography Foundation Models for Opportunistic Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events

Authors: Paula FeldmanNusrat Binta NizamSunwoo KwakBatuhan KaramanKaterina DodelzonMert Sabuncu

Organizations: Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA · Cornell Tech, New York, NY, USA · Cornell University, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death among women, yet cardiovascular risk assessment often relies on clinical variables that may be missing, outdated, or unavailable in routine care. Screening mammography offers an opportunity for opportunistic cardiovascular risk stratification because it is routinely acquired and contains vascular features, including breast arterial calcifications (BAC), that are associated with cardiovascular risk and events. We evaluate whether mammography specific foundation models, originally pretrained for breast cancer-related tasks, can transfer to cardiovascular risk prediction without cardiovascular specific supervision or explicit BAC annotation. We constructed a 5-year major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) cohort of 22,497 women linked to electronic health record outcomes, including 500 events (2.22% prevalence). The foundation models achieved AUROCs of 0.823 and 0.822 substantially exceeding an age-only model (AUROC 0.765), despite using only the screening mammogram as input, with no clinical variables. Both foundation models evaluated assigned substantially higher predicted risk to patients with radiologist-documented BAC, despite BAC never being used as a training label, and showed activation patterns consistent with vascular findings. Together, these findings suggest that mammography foundation models can recover clinically relevant cardiovascular risk information directly from mammographic pixels and suggest that screening mammography may provide an opportunistic source of cardiovascular risk information to complement conventional clinical assessment without additional imaging. Code is available in https://github.com/PauFeld/MammoCVD

Explore similar work

Sep 11, 2026cs.CL

Target leakage, not model class, explains reported accuracy in survey-based cardiovascular screening: a leakage-tiered audit of glass-box and tabular foundation models

Cardiovascular screening models trained on national health surveys routinely report areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) near 0.89. We asked whether that accuracy reflects learning or target leakage, whether tabular foundation models change the answer, and whether the properties deployment requires survive joint examination. We benchmarked ten classifiers spanning linear, tree-ensemble, neural, glass-box, and tabular foundation classes for prevalent myocardial infarction in 442,067 respondents of the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System across five feature tiers of decreasing leakage risk. Each was audited for discrimination, calibration, fairness at an explicit screening threshold, conformal coverage, explanation faithfulness, and inference cost, then applied -- models and thresholds frozen -- to 430,755 respondents of 2023. Removing two post-diagnostic features cost every model 0.049-0.051 AUROC, collapsing the field into a 0.0045-wide band. The glass-box explainable boosting machine was non-inferior to every alternative within a pre-specified 0.005 margin while scoring the cohort roughly 104 times faster than the strongest foundation model. One threshold detected 75.4% of women's infarctions against 89.0% of men's; editing the model's shape functions reduced the gap to 0.010. Marginal conformal prediction gave 0.86 coverage to men and 0.82 to adults over 60; Mondrian calibration repaired every stratum. Frozen models transported within 0.002 AUROC. Reported headroom in this literature is a property of the feature set, not the learner. Transparency cost nothing measurable and made fairness repair and uncertainty conditioning directly auditable. Evaluation practice, not model capacity, is the binding constraint.
Raad Bin Tareaf, Murad Al-Rajab, Samia Loucif +2
Jul 1, 2026cs.CV

EchoRisk: A Multicentre Echocardiography Dataset and Benchmark for Cardio-Oncology

Therapy-induced cardiotoxicity is the leading non-oncological cause of treatment interruption in breast cancer patients, yet early, automated risk stratification from routine cardiac imaging remains an unsolved problem. We present EchoRisk, the first curated, multicentre, longitudinal echocardiography dataset with explicit cardiotoxicity labels, released as the primary technical reference for the EchoRisk-MICCAI 2026 challenge. The dataset comprises 422 patients enrolled in the EU-funded CARDIOCARE prospective study across five European sites, yielding 2,159 echocardiography videos across 1,123 clinical exams acquired at up to five longitudinal timepoints, alongside a dedicated cohort of 280 patients with baseline imaging for early cardiotoxicity prediction. Three clinically grounded tasks are defined: automated estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction from cine video (Task 1), classification of LV dysfunction from longitudinal imaging (Task 2), and early prediction of therapy-induced cardiotoxicity from pre-therapy baseline echocardiography alone (Task 3). For each task we specify the evaluation protocol, primary and secondary metrics, and ranking procedure. We establish baseline performance using an R(2+1)D video backbone with LSTM aggregation trained from Kinetics-400 pretrained weights, demonstrating strong discriminative performance for cardiac functional assessment and LV dysfunction classification, while early cardiotoxicity prediction from a single pre-therapy video remains a significant open problem for the community. The dataset, evaluation code, and baseline implementations are publicly available to serve as a benchmark for further collaboration, comparison, and the creation of task-specific architectures in cardio-oncology.
Grigorios Kalliatakis, Georgia Karanasiou, Georgios Manikis +10
Jun 20, 2026cs.CV

BAC-JEPA: Label-Efficient Breast Arterial Calcification Segmentation via Synthetic Mammography-Guided Supervision

Breast arterial calcification (BAC) on screening mammograms is an emerging cardiovascular risk biomarker, but quantitative use requires reproducible segmentation and expert pixel-level labels are costly. We present BAC-JEPA, a label-efficient segmentation framework trained on procedurally generated arterial calcification inserted into real mammographic backgrounds with exact masks. Candidate backgrounds were selected from model-screened mammograms with low predicted BAC response; the generator samples arterial structure, disease burden, radiographic appearance, and hard-negative distractors including nonarterial calcifications and metallic objects. Synthetic masks are paired with mammography self-supervised Vision Transformer encoders and a high-resolution convolutional decoder to produce full-resolution segmentation maps. The study used 75,472 mammography studies from 34,956 patients for background selection and representation learning, trained on synthetic images from 10,000 backgrounds, selected checkpoints with 1,000 development backgrounds, and evaluated transfer on all 1,000 human-labeled BacSeg synthetic 2D mammograms. On held-out synthetic validation data, the larger backbone achieved IoU 0.5325 and Dice 0.6357. On BacSeg, image-level classification from segmentation probability maps reached AUROC 0.8719, with 0.8547 for the smaller backbone. Four-view inference required 110.68--213.63 ms on an RTX 5090 GPU, and severe-preset synthetic image generation averaged 2.7071 s per image on a multicore workstation. These results indicate that BAC-specific synthetic supervision can produce useful image-level transfer without human pixel-level training masks, while expert-reviewed real-mammogram segmentation remains necessary for clinical validation and calibration.
Scott Chase Waggener, Lakshman Tamil