Joint Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management via Answer Set Programming

While mathematical models act as vital decision support systems for operational Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management (ATFCM), existing approaches isolate Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) from Dynamic Airspace Configuration (DAC). This separation introduces an unresolved circular dependency between fixed-demand and fixed-capacity assumptions. Although joint optimization resolves this gap, the enlarged search space renders exact models computationally intractable for medium- to large-scale instances. To bridge this gap, we propose ASPaeroFlow: a heuristic for the joint ATFCM; it combines instance-space decomposition heuristics with a local exact approach using Answer Set Programming. We benchmark ASPaeroFlow from small to industry-sized instances and compare it with exact and alternative approaches. The results indicate that (1) the heuristic provides a computational middle ground between exact methods and operational baselines; (2) simultaneous optimization can outperform sequential optimization on joint ATFCM; and (3) an ablation study indicates that DAC has a larger impact on solution quality than flow measures.

Effectively managing Air Traffic Control Officer (ATCO) workload is crucial in maintaining operational safety. Group supervisors use tools that estimate upcoming traffic load to aid decision-making. However, industry-standard models can fail to capture the nuances of upcoming air traffic complexity. This study presents a probabilistic approach to forecast the complexity of an airspace sector using the number of relevant aircraft pairs, i.e., those that require monitoring or deconfliction by a controller, as a proxy measure for ATCO workload. We adapted an existing filter algorithm to make it suitable for use in London Middle Sector (LMS), a complex airspace sector with multiple flows of traffic above some of the busiest airports in Europe. Through iterative feedback with ATCOs, the algorithm was refined and extended to handle specific geometric and operational considerations. The updated algorithm outperformed the original, with an F1-score of 0.84 compared to 0.69 on a labelled set of 50 traffic scenarios. To produce forecasts of future numbers of relevant aircraft pairs in the sector, a graph representation of the LMS route network was constructed, standardising the spatial fidelity of route legs. The forecasting method accounts for uncertainty in aircraft arrival times by modelling the probability of each aircraft occupying route segments at future query times. When combined with historic distributions of relevant interactions and a live operational data stream, predictions of upcoming ATCO workload could be made up to 45 minutes in advance. The proposed method to forecast upcoming workload showed a significantly stronger correlation with actual relevant interactions (Spearman's $ρ= 0.68$) than a standard traffic volume prediction ($ρ= 0.55$). The resulting data-driven tool shows promise for use by group supervisors to inform sector configuration and ATCO rostering decisions.

Building accurate decision-support tools for next-generation air traffic control requires robust trajectory prediction models. We present a flow-matching architecture trained exclusively on historical aircraft trajectories, with no route labels or chart supervision. Trained on 1.15 million Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast trajectory windows collected over the San Francisco Bay Area, the model generates aircraft trajectory distributions that closely match historical traffic, reproducing known airspace structure around San Francisco Airport such as the shape of SFO's published NIITE FOUR departure procedure. Our model is trained directly on the native, irregular ADS-B sampling interval. Trajectory prediction is cast as sequence inpainting using a block-causal Transformer that denoises future state tokens conditioned on the observed history using Conditional Flow Matching or Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. We compare our architecture against constant-velocity, deterministic-Long Short Term Memory, and Conditional Variational Autoencoders baselines. At matched parameter count, CFM outperforms DDPM by 11-26% in minADE@20, and both generative objectives surpass the CVAE baseline by 31-41%. We further show that the error degrades gracefully with prediction horizon, and the architecture remains effective when retrained on temporally decimated feeds. Lastly, we sample $K$ independent completions, yielding spatial probabilistic occupancy estimates that can serve as input to downstream conflict-risk estimation.