Abstract
To evaluate whether vision-language models can reason about geological histories, it is necessary to construct observations for which the underlying process history is known. Furthermore, reasoning over geological histories is not just a question of recognizing visual patterns, but also of understanding temporal and structural relationships that may be only indirectly visible or highly ambiguous. When ground-truth event histories are not uniquely identifiable or are unavailable, it remains an open challenge to teach models capable of visual reasoning to produce valid geological reconstructions that are consistent with both observed evidence and geological principles. We therefore investigate whether defining a verifiable geological reasoning task can improve geological event reconstruction across observation domains through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). To this end, we present Geo-Strat-RL, a synthetic environment that generates stratigraphic observations and compact visible-evidence event histories. The environment combines a geological generator with an executable verifier that scores chronology, event identity, deposition, and structural relationships. We show that RLVR improves geological reconstruction in vision-language models (VLMs), increasing geological content scores on held out stratigraphic diagrams. We further evaluate the same held-out geological histories in a synthetic seismic observation domain by converting the generated scenes into acoustic-impedance-derived amplitude sections. In this controlled paired-renderer setting, we present evidence that geological reasoning learned from stratigraphic diagram-domain RLVR training transfers to synthetic seismic representations without seismic-specific training examples, supporting the hypothesis that RLVR can teach reusable geological reasoning concepts across related observation formats.
Explore similar work
Aug 10, 2026cs.CL
Planetary geology relies on historical, interpretive reasoning to reconstruct past events from diverse observations. Here, we present a step toward an automated "machine intelligence geologist" by embedding this distinct methodology of geologic knowledge discovery and inference into a multimodal vision-language architecture. Focusing on the stratigraphy of lunar basaltic mare volcanism, we train a model to generate verifiably grounded geologic interpretations directly from co-registered topographic, spectral, and geologic maps. We demonstrate that while the system successfully balances established geological priors with local visual evidence to accurately describe stratigraphy and terrain, numeric age dating derived solely from vision defaults to memorized priors. Integrating an open-book retrieval mechanism resolves this, enabling the model to faithfully cite published chronologies. Our findings delineate the necessary architecture for automated geologic inference: site evidence must be visually interpreted from local data, while quantitative historical context must be retrieved from the scientific record.
Tom Sander, Kay Wohlfarth, Christian Wöhler
May 12, 2026cs.CV
Geoscience intelligence is expected to understand, reason about, and predict earth system changes to support human decision-making in critical domains such as disaster response, climate adaptation and environmental protection. Although current research has shown promising progress on specific geoscience tasks, such as remote sensing interpretation, geographic question-answering, existing benchmarks remain largely task-specific which failing to capture the open-ended real world geoscience problems. As a result, it remains unclear how far current AI systems are from achieving genuine geoscience intelligence. To address this gap, we present \textbf{GeoR-Bench}, a \underline{Bench}mark for evaluating \underline{Geo}science visual \underline{R}easoning through reasoning informed visual editing tasks. GeoR-Bench contains 440 curated samples spanning 6 geoscience categories and 24 task types, covering earth observation imagery and structured scientific representations such as maps and diagrams. We evaluate outputs along three dimensions, including reasoning, consistency, and quality. Benchmark results of 21 closed- and open-source multimodal models reveal that geoscience reasoning remains a critical bottleneck. The highest-performing model achieves 42.7% overall strict accuracy, while the best open-source models only get 10.3%. Notably, the visual consistency and image quality of the outputs frequently surpass their scientific accuracy. Ultimately, these findings indicate that current models generate superficially plausible results but fail to capture underlying earth science processes.
Yushuo Zheng, Zicheng Zhang, Huiyu Duan +7
May 24, 2026cs.AI
While general-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs) applied to Geology often hallucinate when reasoning about subsurface structures and deep-time evolution, current AI in Earth sciences predominantly targets surface remote sensing and GIS. To bridge this gap, we introduce Geo-Expert, a family of parameter-efficient geological LLMs fine-tuned on a custom-curated, high-quality instruction dataset processed using our custom instruction synthesis pipeline. We investigate the impact of model scaling and architecture by fine-tuning three base models: Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-32B, and Gemma-3-27B, with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) method. Our extensive evaluation on a novel domain-specific benchmark, Geo-Eval, reveals that a domain-aligned 8B model can outperform open-weight 70B generalists and proprietary GPT-4o on specialized geological reasoning, while a 32B variant approaches frontier reasoning models. The optimized 8B model further offers a competitive cost-performance ratio for deployment. This work provides a reproducible recipe for democratizing scientific LLMs and establishes a baseline for geological artificial intelligence.
Chenyou Guo, Zongqi Liu, Yizhou Zhang +2