Agentic evolution of physically constrained foundation models

Toward recursive self-improvement, we investigate LLM agents autonomously designing foundation models beyond standard Transformers. We introduce a dual-framework approach: AIRA-Compose for high-level architecture search, and AIRA-Design for low-level mechanistic implementation. AIRA-Compose uses 11 agents to explore fundamental computational primitives under a 24-hour budget. Agents evaluate million-parameter candidates, extrapolating top designs to 350M, 1B, and 3B scales. This yields 14 architectures across two families: AIRAformers (Transformer-based) and AIRAhybrids (Transformer-Mamba). Pre-trained at 1B scale, these consistently outperform Llama 3.2 and Composer-found baselines. On downstream tasks, AIRAformer-D and AIRAhybrid-D improve accuracy by 2.4% and 3.8% over Llama 3.2. Furthermore, AIRA-Compose finds models with highly efficient scaling frontiers: AIRAformer-C scales 54% and 71% faster than Llama 3.2 and Composer's best Transformer, while AIRAhybrid-C outscales Nemotron-2 by 23% and Composer's best hybrid by 37%. AIRA-Design tasks 20 agents with writing novel attention mechanisms for long-range dependencies and high-performing training scripts. On the Long Range Arena benchmark, agent-designed architectures reach within 2.3% and 2.6% of human state-of-the-art on document matching and text classification. On the Autoresearch benchmark, Greedy Opus 4.5 achieves 0.968 validation bits-per-byte under a fixed time budget, surpassing the published minimum. Together, these frameworks show AI agents can autonomously discover architectures and algorithmic optimizations matching or surpassing hand-designed baselines. This establishes a powerful paradigm for discovering next-generation foundation models, marking a clear step toward recursive self-improvement.

Foundation models are deep neural networks (such as GPT-5, Gemini3, and Opus4) trained on large datasets that can perform diverse downstream tasks -- text and code generation, question answering, summarization, image classification, and so on. The philosophy of foundation models is to put effort into a single, large (${\sim}10^{12}$-parameter) general-purpose model that can be adapted to many downstream tasks with no or minimal additional training. We argue that the rise of foundation models presents an opportunity for hardware engineers: in contrast to when different models were used for different tasks, it now makes sense to build special-purpose, fixed hardware implementations of neural networks, manufactured and released at the roughly 1-year cadence of major new foundation-model versions. Beyond conventional digital-electronic inference hardware with read-only weight memory, we advocate a more radical re-thinking: hardware in which the neural network is realized directly at the level of the physical design and operates via the hardware's natural physical dynamics -- \textit{Physical Foundation Models} (PFMs). PFMs could enable orders-of-magnitude advantages in energy efficiency, speed, and parameter density. For ${\sim}10^{12}$-parameter models, this would both reduce the high energy burden of AI in datacenters and enable AI in edge devices that today are power-constrained to far smaller models. PFMs could also enable inference hardware for models much larger than current ones: $10^{15}$- or even $10^{18}$-parameter PFMs seem plausible by some measures. We present back-of-the-envelope calculations illustrating PFM scaling using an optical example -- a 3D nanostructured glass medium -- and discuss prospects in nanoelectronics and other physical platforms. We conclude with the major research challenges that must be resolved for trillion-parameter PFMs and beyond to become reality.

AlphaEvolve and FunSearch have demonstrated the potential of combining large language models (LLMs) with evolutionary search for automated algorithm discovery. However, discovery success is shaped not only by model capability but also significantly by the design of the execution infrastructure, i.e., the harness. This paper investigates effective harness design through three questions: under a fixed token budget, is it better to produce many algorithms with brief thought or fewer algorithms with deeper thought? How should the harness handle evaluation hacks, where generated programs exploit the scoring function? And how can agents that require full filesystem access execute safely in parallel? Using Vesper, an algorithm discovery framework that incorporates harness improvements addressing these questions, we evaluate on Circle Packing under the same token budget. Interestingly, generating fewer algorithms while thinking more deeply about each one achieved higher scores. That is, scaling the quality of each individual is more budget-efficient than scaling the number of evolutionary generations. Surprisingly, more capable models produced evaluation hacks at higher rates, making hack detection increasingly necessary as models scale.