Analysis of Parameter Settings for the Bat Algorithm Using Variance Evolution

Problems defined on binary decision spaces have been intensively studied in the theory of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs). In contrast, no mathematical runtime analyses exist so far for MOEAs dealing with decision variables that take a finite number $r > 2$ of values, despite the prevalence of such problems in practice. In this work, we begin to fill this research gap. We analyze how the classic SEMO algorithm with unit-strength local mutation computes the Pareto front of an $r$-valued counterpart of the classic \oneminmax benchmark. For the expected number of function evaluations until the Pareto front is covered by the population of this MOEA, we prove an upper bound of $O(n^2 r^2 \log n)$ and a near-tight lower bound of $Ω(n^2 r (r + \log n))$. We can close the small remaining gap between these two bounds by considering a variant of the algorithm that accepts only strictly better solutions; for this variant, we show an upper bound of $O(n^2 r (r + \log n))$, matching our lower bound (which also holds for this variant). Our results suggest that classic MOEAs encounter no significant additional difficulties when dealing with multi-valued decision variables. However, significantly more advanced tools may be required to obtain tight bounds for algorithms with more complex population dynamics.

Baldwinian and Lamarckian evolution have existed for a long time in evolutionary algorithms (EAs) without ever dominating the academic literature or practical applications. In this work, we use modern empirical and theoretical methods to revisit Lamarckian and Baldwinian evolution and rigorously compare them with the generic Darwinian evolution. On the empirical side, we run a comprehensive suite of experiments on graphs from six different datasets from the recent GraphBench benchmark on Maximum Independent Set and Maximum Cut problems. Our results show that Baldwinian and Lamarckian evolution consistently outperform Darwinian evolution, confirming the great potential of local search augmented evolutionary algorithms. Notably, in the great majority of cases, all EAs outperform recent deep learning baselines and approach the performance of highly specialised heuristic and exact solvers. We furthermore report a high-performing set of generalist parameters for all studied evolution types that we hope will be of use to practitioners in future. On the theoretical side, we extend the existing DeceptiveLeadingBlocks benchmark to arbitrary block length $k$. For all constant $k$, we then prove asymptotically tight runtime bounds for the $(1+1)$ EA in the three evolution types on this benchmark. For Baldwinian evolution, these are independent of $k$, whereas for the other two evolution types, the runtimes steeply increase with growing value of $k$.

We study the $(1 + 1)$-EA in dynamic linear environments, where in every generation selection is performed with respect to a freshly sampled linear function with positive weights. We consider the Dynamic Binary Value problem, where each generation uses a uniformly random permutation of $1,2,4,\dots,2^{n-1}$, and a Uniform weight variant, where the weights are drawn independently from $\mathrm{Unif}(0,1)$. Both of them have recently been integrated into the IOHprofiler platform and empirically studied. For both models we prove a sharp threshold in the mutation parameter $χ$ for mutation rate $χ/n$. Below the threshold, the expected optimisation time is $\mathcal{O}(n\log n)$, whereas above it the runtime becomes $2^{Ω(n)}$. For the Dynamic Binary Value problem in the exponential regime, we also quantify at what distance from the optimum the optimisation process stagnates. We show that there is a second threshold: a distance that is efficiently reached, but reaching any smaller distance takes exponential time. This quantifies and proves previous empirical findings.