Anti-Collapse Dynamics and the Emergence of Multi-Time-Scale Learning in Recurrent Neural Networks

Lorenzo Livi

cs.LGJun 28, 2026

Anti-Collapse Dynamics and the Emergence of Multi-Time-Scale Learning in Recurrent Neural Networks

Authors: Lorenzo Livi

Organizations: OPIT – Open Institute of Technology

Abstract

Long-range learning is hard for recurrent networks trained with stochastic gradient descent, because the influence of a past input fades with the lag $\ell$ , and if it fades too fast the dependence cannot be learned from finite data. This fade is captured by an envelope $f(\ell)$ . An exponential fade makes the data needed to learn a lag- $\ell$ dependence grow exponentially, putting long horizons out of reach; a power-law fade keeps the cost polynomial. We show that the asymptotic decay class of $f(\ell)$ is not fixed by the architecture. Instead, it emerges from the coupling between the state dynamics and parameter dynamics, settling into either a collapsed regime (fast, exponential forgetting) or an extended, anti-collapsed regime (slow, power-law forgetting). The intuition is a competition within these coupled dynamics. Training drives the network's effective time scales toward short ones, while rare, heavy-tailed fluctuations of the learning dynamics push a few of them to very long values. The extended regime survives only when these heavy-tailed pushes are strong enough to balance the pull. We make this mathematically precise with a coarse-grained stochastic process and prove exactly when the extended regime exists. A single exponent, the spectral exponent~ $β$ , then governs both the spread of time scales and how slowly the network forgets. Realizing the regime in practice needs one more ingredient: the joint action of the architecture and the optimizer must be able to hold such a broad spread. A network whose capacity to generate broad time-scale spectra is severely constrained still collapses, even when supplied with strong heavy-tailed forcing. Heavy-tailed fluctuations thus act not as noise to be suppressed, but as the mechanism that sustains long-range learning.

Explore similar work

Dec 5, 2025cs.LG

Learnability Window in Gated Recurrent Neural Networks

We develop a statistical theory of temporal learnability in recurrent neural networks, quantifying the maximal temporal horizon

\mathcal{H}_N

over which gradient-based learning can recover lag-dependent structure at finite sample size

N

. The theory is built on the effective learning rate envelope

f(\ell)

, a function that captures how gating mechanisms and adaptive optimizers jointly shape the coupling between state-space dynamics and parameter updates during Backpropagation Through Time. Under heavy-tailed (

α

-stable) fluctuations, where empirical averages concentrate at rate

N^{-1/κ_α}

with

κ_α= α/(α-1)

, the interplay between envelope decay and statistical concentration yields explicit scaling laws for the growth of

\mathcal{H}_N

: logarithmic, polynomial, and exponential temporal learning regimes emerge according to the decay law of

f(\ell)

. These results identify envelope decay as the key determinant of temporal learnability. Slower attenuation of

f(\ell)

enlarges

\mathcal{H}_N

, while heavy-tailed fluctuations compress it by weakening statistical concentration. Moreover, envelope geometry outweighs dataset size: slowing the envelope's decay enlarges

\mathcal{H}_N

more than adding data, so more complex architectures that realize slower-decaying envelopes can be more data-efficient than simpler ones. Experiments across multiple gated architectures and optimizers corroborate these structural predictions.

Lorenzo Livi

Recurrent Neural Networks Gated Recurrent Unit Learning Rates Temporal Learnability

Ask PDF

Sep 8, 2026cs.LG

Learning Length-Extrapolatable Recurrent Models

Recurrent models provide a natural path to long-context modeling, yet models trained with backpropagation through time (BPTT) often fail beyond their training horizon. Classical analyses emphasize gradients that vanish or explode along temporal paths. However, dense per-token losses can still train a shared recurrent rule despite severe decay, showing that decay alone does not determine whether learning fails. We instead study state credit: the signal through which future losses reach earlier recurrent states before contributing to parameter updates. Accordingly, we intervene directly on state credit and propose Credit Stabilization through Time (CST). During backward propagation, CST locally rescales the state-credit signal to stabilize its norm without rotating the component being corrected, while leaving the forward computation unchanged. Because controlled synthetic tasks and real data exhibit different credit dynamics, we specialize CST to each regime. In both settings, CST improves performance beyond the training horizon, with gains observed at up to 128x the training length.

Hanwen Jiang

Recurrent Model Efficient Long-Context Inference Temporal Learnability Backpropagation Causal Attention Token-Level Supervision+1

Ask PDF

Aug 31, 2026cs.LG

How Temporal Correlations Shape Memory in Linear Recurrent Neural Networks

The linear recurrent neural network (LRNN) is a simple model for studying how much memory a network builds up as it trains. For uncorrelated inputs, earlier work found that training itself settles the network between keeping the past and reacting only to the present. Real sequences are correlated, and we solve the learning dynamics exactly for correlated inputs. In the solution, keeping the past carries a cost. The whole effect of correlation lands on that cost. This cost reduces to the earlier one when inputs are uncorrelated and grows once they are positively correlated. Three findings follow. (1) Correlation reshapes the course of learning, not only its end. Memory builds, overshoots, and is partly removed, and the settled network keeps less of the past. (2) Memory switches off at a threshold set by one number, how much each input resembles the one just before it. Neither sequence length nor longer-range correlation moves this threshold. Memory is worth keeping only when the task needs the previous input more than the current input already supplies it through correlation with the past. (3) The best network changes too. Zero error demands a feedthrough, a path that passes the current input straight to the network's output and remembers nothing, and training builds it unprompted when given one spare hidden dimension. Our work turns one property of the input into a prediction of whether a network learns memory and explains why correlated data turns recurrent networks into change detectors.

Arnol Manuel Fokam, Fasseu Sieyondji Akpevwoghene, Edem Fiifi Dawson

Recurrent Neural Networks Temporal Memory Long-Range Temporal Dependencies

Ask PDF