HistoriQA-ThirdRepublic: Multi-Hop Question Answering Corpus for Historical Research, Parliamentary Debates from the French Third Republic (1870-1940)

Historical archives pose a difficult retrieval problem for retrievalaugmented generation systems: documents are OCR-degraded, heterogeneous across genres and sources, and require strong source traceability for scholarly and institutional use. We introduce TRACE, a training-free agentic retrieval framework designed for accountable source discovery over historical corpora. The system was developed in the context of DECIDON, an interdisciplinary project on the circulation of political discourse between parliamentary debates and the press during the French Third Republic, involving digitised historical collections and institutional use cases. The prototype is currently deployed internally within the project and accessible to 24 researchers across six partner institutions. We evaluate TRACE on HistoriQA-ThirdRepublic, a benchmark of 1,752 French historical questions over parliamentary debates and newspapers from 1887, with documents derived from Biblioth{è}que nationale de France digitised collections. TRACE achieves R@10 = 0.856 and MRR = 0.653, outperforming sparse, dense, graph-based, and agentic RAG baselines, with the largest gains on multi-hop and cross-corpus questions. At approximately $0.02 per question under the default hosted inference configuration, TRACE also remains economically feasible for heritage institutions, laboratories or companies that cannot rely on costly local GPU infrastructure. These results suggest that, for large digital libraries and archives, retrieval accountability and corpus-aware agent design can provide a practical alternative to heavier training-based or graph-construction approaches.

Was this person ever at that place, and if so, when? Answering such questions from noisy, multilingual historical documents is the central challenge of HIPE-2026, the third edition of the HIPE evaluation series. Moving from named entity recognition and linking (HIPE-2020, HIPE-2022) to reasoning about relationships between entities, HIPE-2026 targets two temporally grounded relation types: $at$, indicating that a person was present at a location at some point prior to a document's publication date, and $isAt$, indicating presence contemporaneous with that date. This paper presents the results of the evaluation campaign, which confronted 17 participating teams with the challenges of historical language variation, OCR noise, and indirect contextual cues across three languages: French, German, and English. The datasets include historical newspaper text from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, as well as a surprise-domain generalization set drawn from early modern French literary texts. A distinctive feature of HIPE-2026 is its three-fold evaluation framework, which assesses predictive accuracy, computational efficiency, and cross-domain generalization, reflecting the practical demands of large-scale historical document processing in the cultural heritage domain. Across more than 40 submitted runs, results reveal a wide range of strategies, from state-of-the-art large language models to lightweight task-specific classifiers, and highlight the trade-offs between accuracy, efficiency, and robustness inherent to historical relation extraction at corpus scale. System descriptions, datasets, and findings are presented and discussed, offering a detailed picture of the current state of temporally grounded relation extraction for historical documents.

Knowledge-intensive multi-hop question answering requires systems to select evidence and compose dependent facts, yet multilingual benchmarks usually translate an entire example into one language. This hides failures at language boundaries inside the reasoning chain. We introduce XHotpotQA, a controlled benchmark for cross-lingual knowledge composition over mixed-language evidence. Each instance is modeled as an evidence-dependency graph whose question, bridge evidence, answer-bearing evidence, and distractors have explicit language assignments. The audited resource contains 15,661 training and 7,405 validation instances, with sentence-level support supervision and supplied distractors. In validation, 99.81% of items cross the question-to-gold-evidence language interface and 95.60% use gold paragraphs in different languages. Across three reader artifacts, full question-evidence mismatch is associated with 10.25 to 15.79 lower Unicode-aware answer F1 than partial alignment, and different-script evidence with deficits of 11.98 to 23.70 points; the corresponding adapted-selector contrasts are 1.71 and 1.78 points. Under this supplied-candidate design, the evaluated readers therefore show substantially larger condition-associated deficits than the selector. XHotpotQA provides role-aware diagnostics, modular evaluation, and an audited test bed for knowledge-based systems that must integrate evidence across languages.