Bridging Quantum Computing Paradigms toward Semiconductor Yield: A Controlled CV-versus-DV Comparison on Wafer-Map Defect Classification

Early detection of oral cancer markedly improves clinical outcomes, yet specialized diagnostic tools remain scarce in low-resource settings. Smartphone-based screening is a scalable alternative but needs lightweight models that run within edge-hardware constraints. Hybrid classical-quantum architectures are emerging candidates for parameter-efficient learning, yet most rely on qubit hardware that needs cryogenic operation, unsuitable for edge deployment. Continuous-variable (CV) photonic quantum computing, which operates at room temperature, offers a complementary route. We investigate a hybrid classical-CV quantum classifier for oral cancer detection from smartphone images. The pipeline combines a MobileNetV1 feature extractor, principal component analysis to 16 dimensions, and a parameterized CV-QNN of displacement, interferometric, and Kerr gates on a photonic backend. We propose a simplified $Φ\circ D \circ U_1$ CV-QNN architecture that cuts trainable parameters 40-45% relative to the standard CV-QNN layer of Killoran et al. (2019a), and identify dimensionality-reduction and encoding-restriction strategies that mitigate barren plateaus, raising loss-gradient variance by roughly 58 orders of magnitude. Whether the simplified layer beats the full layer is width-dependent: the full layer holds a small but significant edge at two qumodes, whereas the simplified layer is significantly better at four qumodes using 44% fewer parameters. The strongest model, a four-qumode simplified CV-QNN with only 18 parameters, attains the highest validation AUC of all models, exceeds a 55-parameter classical baseline using 67% fewer parameters, and reaches 100% calibrated test accuracy across all seeds. These results support CV photonic quantum machine learning for parameter-efficient, room-temperature medical image classification and motivate progress toward edge quantum AI.

The rapid growth of computer vision and increasingly complex image recognition tasks has exposed fundamental computational limitations of classical machine learning models, motivating the exploration of quantum computing as an emerging new paradigm. This paper presents a comprehensive benchmarking study of classical and quantum machine learning models for image recognition on the MNIST handwritten digit dataset, evaluating both traditional models, a Classical Support Vector Machine (CSVM) and a Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM), and deep neural network models, a Classical Convolutional Neural Network (CCNN) and a Quantum Convolutional Neural Network (QCNN), across four performance dimensions: classification accuracy, computational runtime, parameter count, and memory requirements. Experiments are conducted as functions of both feature dimensionality and sample size, and across CPU and GPU execution environments, providing a controlled, multidimensional comparison to address gaps in prior work. For the SVM-based models, QSVM consistently outperforms CSVM in accuracy, reaching $\sim$ 0.90 versus $\sim$ 0.85 at 1,000 samples, with a higher computational cost. A feature count of 10 qubits and a sample size in the range of 200 -- 500 emerge as practical operating points that balance accuracy and runtime. For the neural network models, CCNN and QCNN achieve comparable classification accuracy, both exceeding 0.96 at 64 features and 60,000 samples, yet QCNN offers substantially superior parameter and memory efficiency, requiring $\sim$ 94% fewer parameters and $\sim$ 75% less memory than CCNN at higher feature counts, while incurring higher runtime. Across both model families, quantum models consistently outperform classical models by greater margins in accuracy as feature dimensionality or sample size increases.

Variational quantum circuits (VQCs) are a leading approach to quantum machine learning on near-term devices, yet it remains unclear which circuit architecture yields the best accuracy-parameter trade-off on classical tabular data. We present a systematic empirical comparison of four VQC families -- multi-layer fully-connected (FC-VQC), residual (ResNet-VQC), hybrid quantum-classical transformer (QT), and fully quantum transformer (FQT) -- across five regression and classification benchmarks. Our key findings are: \textbf{(i)}~FC-VQCs achieve 90-96% of the $R^2$ of attention-based VQCs while using 40-50% fewer parameters, and consistently outperform equal-capacity MLPs (mean $R^2{=}0.829$ vs.\ MLP$_{720}$'s $0.753$ on Boston Housing, 3-seed average); \textbf{(ii)}FC-VQC's Type4 inter-block connectivity provides partial cross-token mixing that approximates the role of attention -- explicit quantum self-attention yields only marginal gains on most datasets while significantly increasing parameter count; \textbf{(iii)}expressibility saturates at circuit depth${\approx}\,3$, explaining why shallow VQCs already cover the Hilbert space effectively; \textbf{(iv)}~LayerNorm on the fully quantum transformer improves classification accuracy, suggesting normalization is important when all operations are quantum; \textbf{(v)}~in our noise study on Boston Housing, FQT degrades gracefully under depolarizing noise while QT collapses. All results are validated across three random seeds. These findings provide practical architectural guidance for deploying VQCs on near-term quantum hardware.