Bringing Agentic Search to Earth Observation Data Discovery

Large language models have recently been explored for scientific hypothesis generation, but most prior work relies on unstructured literature and free-form textual claims. We present a pipeline for Earth observation that grounds hypothesis generation directly in the NASA Earth Observation Knowledge Graph. A heterogeneous graph neural network trained on historical co-usage relations ranks candidate dataset pairings, and a three-agent LLM pipeline filters, generates, and evaluates structured research hypotheses. Applied to 1,475 NASA datasets, the system produces 160 hypotheses spanning multiple Earth-science domains, including ecohydrology, glaciology, aerosol--cloud interactions, vegetation phenology, and stratospheric chemistry. Model-predicted novel dataset pairings are rated nearly as plausible as held-out real co-usages from the literature, indicating that the pipeline surfaces scientifically coherent yet unexplored combinations. A 222 factorial experiment across GPT-5.2 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 shows that hypothesis rankings remain stable, while absolute scores depend strongly on judge identity, highlighting limitations of single-judge LLM evaluation.

Earth system science is producing increasingly large, high-dimensional datasets from both physics-based and AI-driven models. While embedding-based representations make these data searchable and serve as foundational building blocks for AI-driven discovery engines, nearest neighbors in latent spaces are not automatically scientifically meaningful. They may reflect real meteorological structures, or simply artifacts of preprocessing, geography, or model bias. Researchers therefore need visual tools to inspect latent space organization, trace search results back to physical evidence, and evaluate candidate representations against one another. We present an open source visual analytics workbench designed to support this provenance-aware scientific retrieval workflow. The system links distinct embedding experiments to shared source data, metadata, spatial contexts, and model configurations. It enables interactive retrieval strategy design by allowing users to issue image-level and localized patch-level queries, apply multi-constraint filters, and inspect analogs through familiar meteorological views. This facilitates a discovery loop where scientists characterize a phenomenon in a well-understood dataset and use its latent signature to probe larger archives. While we demonstrate the workbench through a tropical cyclone retrieval scenario using a vision foundation model (DINOv3) on ERA5 data, the framework is model-agnostic and designed to integrate with other embedding architectures in the future. Finally, we evaluate its out-of-core retrieval backend, demonstrating that interactive visual search over tens of millions of embeddings is highly scalable on commodity hardware.

Climate and environmental decision-making increasingly requires reasoning across heterogeneous inputs, including gridded physical data, satellite imagery, geospatial context, and simulator outputs. Weather and climate foundation models can forecast well, but do not reason interactively in language, while large language models (LLMs) reason in language but cannot operate directly on high-dimensional Earth-system data. As a result, real scientific workflows in Earth-science remain underserved. We introduce TerraBench, a benchmark for grounded Earth-science reasoning, built on TerraAgent, a ReAct-style executable framework that interleaves reasoning, tool calls, and observations to couple LLM planning with scientific tools for environmental retrieval, geospatial processing, simulation, and artifact-backed computation. TerraBench unifies analysis of Earth observation imagery, gridded data, GIS reasoning and simulation in a single executable interface, whereas prior benchmarks isolate these capabilities into narrow individual tasks. It is also the first in this space to pair process-level tool-use metrics with tolerance-aware numeric scoring. The benchmark comprises 403 extensive agentic tasks across three tracks (Fundamentals, Simulator-Grounded, and Document-Grounded Verification) and eight application domains with 24,500 verified execution steps. These results indicate that reliable Earth-science agents must go beyond tool access to coordinate heterogeneous workflows, parameterize tools precisely, and preserve artifact provenance.