Towards Real-World Applications with an Autonomous Powered Wheelchair

Human movement is inherently variable, with variability structured according to task relevance: movements are typically more consistent at task-critical points and more flexible elsewhere. In human-robot interaction (HRI), however, model-based assistance strategies commonly assume deterministic human behavior and suppress such variability, potentially altering how interactions are experienced and lowering sense of agency. While movement variability is increasingly recognized as functionally meaningful, its deliberate preservation in assisted interaction, and its consequences for user experience, remain underexplored. In this paper, we empirically investigate how different assistance strategies shape human movement variability, task performance, and subjective interaction experience in a shared control setting. We introduce an autonomy-supportive shared control strategy that preserves users' natural movement structure. This approach is evaluated in a user study in which participants push an intelligent powered wheelchair under three conditions: no assistance, conventional variability-reducing assistance, and variability-preserving assistance. While task-relevant performance remained comparable across assisted modes, preserving natural movement variability led to more favorable interaction experiences. In particular, participants reported significantly higher perceived agency compared to conventional assistance and highest perceived usefulness. These findings suggest that variability-aware assistance can support both performance and user autonomy in physical human-robot collaboration. More broadly, the results highlight the importance of designing assistive robotic systems that respect the embodied structure of human movement rather than treating variability as noise to be neglected or eliminated.

Collecting real-world navigation data for mobile robots typically requires platform-specific teleoperation, making large-scale collection expensive and difficult to scale. We introduce Universal Navigation Interface (UNI), a robot-free data collection paradigm that uses a four-wheeled rollator walker (rollator) and smartphone to collect physically constrained human demonstrations. Because the rollator cannot climb stairs, negotiate uncut curbs, or pass through narrow gaps, demonstrations are naturally biased toward wheeled-feasible routes. Using UNI, we collect 37.2 km of real-world navigation data and recover metric trajectories that directly supervise goal-conditioned navigation models. Fine-tuning visual-navigation models on UNI reduces trajectory prediction error by 17.4-24.8% on held-out UNI demonstrations. Evaluation on other navigation datasets shows benefits that vary by dataset and metric. We further demonstrate closed-loop transfer to a powered wheelchair in curb, staircase, and curb-cut scenarios. These results support low-cost physical proxies as a practical source of navigation supervision collected without the target robot.

The decline of human balance control due to aging and pathological conditions increases fall risk, a major concern in geriatric care and rehabilitation. Gait training is essential for balance recovery, enhancing walking ability and postural control. However, existing overground robotic gait trainers have limitations: body weight support systems are bulky and impractical for daily use, while end-effector-based systems often compromise transparency, altering natural gait dynamics. This paper presents the Dynamic Robotic Balance Assistant (DRBA), a novel gait trainer providing assist-as-needed body weight and balance support for various training scenarios. DRBA integrates a 3-degree-of-freedom (3-DoF) robotic arm for pelvic support with flexible motion, a compact sit-to-stand assistance module, and user-following and fall detection algorithms to ensure minimal interference and responsive support. Experimental results demonstrated high transparency, with minimal impact on natural gait dynamics. A patient trial with nine elderly patients with varying medical conditions and balance impairments (ranging from severe to mild) further validated DRBA's effectiveness. The results showed that DRBA-assisted training increased step length and walking speed compared to therapist-assisted gait training. Additionally, DRBA enabled users to perform tasks beyond their unaided ability, expanding rehabilitation possibilities. These findings highlight DRBA's potential to enhance rehabilitation outcomes by facilitating higher training intensity and enabling task-oriented exercises.