A Compact Top-Loading Robot for Endovascular Interventions: Design, Control and Evaluation
Authors: Jonas Fischer, Lennart Karstensen, Franziska Mathis-Ullrich
Organizations: Laboratory for Surgical Planning and Robot Cognition (SPARC), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberger Straße 74, Erlangen, 91052, Bavaria, Germany.
Abstract
Robot-assisted endovascular intervention can potentially reduce radiation exposure, improve surgeon ergonomics, enable telesurgery, support active assistance and autonomy, and enhance procedural precision. However, existing systems often suffer from limited procedural coverage because constrained patient-side setups, restricted flexibility, and complex instrument exchange hinder clinical workflow integration. This work presents a compact robotic system for endovascular interventions that enables continuous translational and rotational manipulation of standard endovascular instruments. The system consists of two alternating carts with pneumatically actuated membrane grippers integrated into rotating gripper gears. Its top-loading design allows rapid exchange of instruments such as guidewires and catheters without changing the robotic setup. A leader-follower control strategy enables continuous motion despite the finite stroke of each cart. The system was evaluated in motion-tracking experiments with guidewires and catheters and in an in vitro vascular phantom. The motion-tracking experiments showed generally smooth translational and rotational motion profiles. Across all tested guidewire and catheter experiments, the mean relative tracking errors were 3.6% for translational motion and 4.1% for rotational motion. In the vascular phantom, robot-assisted navigation reached the target in most trials, demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed manipulation concept under in vitro conditions. The presented robotic system demonstrates technical feasibility for continuous manipulation of standard endovascular instruments in bench-top and in vitro experiments. The compact top-loading design may ease instrument exchange and clinical workflow integration. Future work will focus on improving gripping performance, actuation speed, force feedback, and evaluation in more clinically realistic settings.
An endovascular intervention begins with a skilled clinician manually navigating a long, slender wire, called a guidewire, to the target location within the vasculature. Due to factors, such as vessel tortuosity and lack of steerability at the guidewire tip, manual navigation of a guidewire could be challenging, potentially resulting in vessel damage, perforation, dissection, and occlusion, as well as postsurgical complications, such as thrombosis. This work details the development of a handheld actuation mechanism for tendon-driven robotic guidewires by utilizing the aforementioned spooling mechanism. Incorporating the compact spooling mechanism into a handheld device enables clinicians to leverage both motorized guidewire steering and manual rotation and translation, if desired. The proposed device is designed such that, while holding the device, the clinician can execute feeding, rotation, and bending motions for up to 1.5 m of the robotically steerable guidewire using a joystick and momentary switch on the handle. Furthermore, the proposed device is demonstrated through navigation in an anatomically accurate phantom aorta model.
Saima Chavenet, Timothy A. Brumfiel, Revanth Konda +1
Remote robotic-assisted endovascular intervention offers a promising approach to reduce clinician radiation exposure and physical strain, while extending specialized vascular care to geographically distant regions. Despite advancements, teleoperated endovascular intervention remains underexplored, especially for time-sensitive interventions like mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke. The aim of the current review was to determine the evidence regarding teleoperated endovascular robotic systems, covering technical feasibility, communication infrastructure, and clinical outcomes. The review further identified research gaps and future directions. Following PRISMA guidelines, 16 studies were included that met the inclusion criteria out of 2501 initial search results. We found that teleoperated catheters and guidewires, driven by mechanical or electromagnetic systems, can be navigated across distances up to 7000 km. With robust communication infrastructure, network latency remained within clinically acceptable limits (30-163 ms). Although initial outcomes highlighted 100% procedural success in small-scale human trials, most evidence stemmed from animal or phantom models. Overall, the findings suggest that teleoperated endovascular intervention can reduce occupational hazards, expand patient access to urgent procedures, and optimize resource allocation. Future research should be conducted in low and middle income countries to demonstrate broader geographical access. Ultimately, multi-center clinical trials are required to validate the safety, efficacy, and generalization in diverse clinical settings.
Objective: To evaluate robotic controller interfaces for interventional neuroradiology procedures in-vitro incorporating a force-sensing platform to assess safety. Methods: A custom endovascular robot, device-mimicking controller, and sensorized neurovascular phantom were developed. Ten interventional neuroradiologists (4 novices, 6 experts) performed simulated navigations using four control modalities: device-mimicking controllers with and without haptic feedback, joystick-based input, and manual navigation. Navigation time, peak vessel-wall forces, incorrect catheterisations, and prolapse events were assessed, alongside user analyses. Results: Manual navigation was fastest (mean 47.7 s) compared to haptic-on (248.7 s), haptic-off (314.7 s), and joystick (392.6 s) modalities (p<0.001). Regardless of controller type, vessel-wall forces were below the 0.70 N puncture threshold; therefore all modalities were considered safe. Joystick produced significantly more prolapse events than manual control (1.56 vs 0.13; p=0.018). Operator experience was relevant to performance: experts made fewer incorrect catheterisations than novices (0.25 vs 0.62; p=0.035) and applied less vessel-wall force (p<0.0005); these effects were sustained across controllers but accentuated when haptics were on. Users perceived haptic on and haptic off as similarly intuitive, and more intuitive than joystick (p=0.033). Conclusion: Device-mimicking robotic controllers outperform joystick interfaces on most metrics; haptic feedback shows promising but non-significant performance benefits.
Benjamin Jackson, Nikola Fischer, Harry Robershaw +16