Federated Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Roles, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges

Explainable AI (XAI) methods have demonstrated significant success in recent years at identifying relevant features in input data that drive deep learning model decisions, enhancing interpretability for users. However, the potential of XAI beyond providing model transparency has remained largely unexplored in adjacent machine learning domains. In this paper, we show for the first time how XAI can be utilized in the context of federated learning. Specifically, while federated learning enables collaborative model training without raw data sharing, it suffers from performance degradation when client data distributions exhibit statistical heterogeneity. We introduce FedXDS (Federated Learning via XAI-guided Data Sharing), the first approach to utilize feature attribution techniques to identify precisely which data elements should be selectively shared between clients to mitigate heterogeneity. By employing propagation-based attribution, our method identifies task-relevant features through a single backward pass, enabling selective data sharing that aligns client contributions. To protect sensitive information, we incorporate metric privacy techniques that provide formal privacy guarantees while preserving utility. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach consistently achieves higher accuracy and faster convergence compared to existing methods across varying client numbers and heterogeneity settings. We provide theoretical privacy guarantees and empirically demonstrate robustness against both membership inference and feature inversion attacks. Code is available at https://github.com/MaxH1996/FedXDS.

Federated Learning (FL) with Differential Privacy (DP) is increasingly adopted to preserve data confidentiality in distributed machine learning. However, DP noise distorts learned representations and degrades explanation fidelity, limiting differentially private FL where trustworthy explanations are required, such as assistive clinical diagnosis. Prior work adapted DP noise with static feature-importance signals, restricting explainability to post hoc analysis and precluding noise calibration to explanation quality during training. We propose XCal-FL, a closed-loop, explainability-driven local training algorithm for image classification in cross-silo FL that dynamically calibrates DP noise from three complementary signals: (1) prediction logit variations, measuring causal influence on model confidence, (2) counterfactual margins, capturing decision-boundary sensitivity, and (3) saliency concentration, quantifying spatial coherence of model attention, while enforcing formal DP guarantees via adaptive privacy accounting. Experiments on three medical imaging datasets across varying FL configurations show that XCal-FL yields more accurate and interpretable global models, improving predictive performance by over 10% and explanation fidelity by up to 5$\times$ over static-noise FL, and outperforming state-of-the-art adaptive DP methods in fidelity. XCal-FL also achieves higher privacy-budget efficiency, turning each unit of cumulative privacy loss into larger gains in both accuracy and explanation fidelity. Our analysis further reveals that, unlike predictive performance, which scales roughly linearly with privacy loss, explanation fidelity exhibits non-linear dynamics. These findings suggest explainability is a distinct dimension of the privacy trade-off that cannot be inferred from utility alone, with implications for training and privacy-budget allocation in decision-critical applications.

Performance evaluation is essential for assessing the quality of machine learning (ML) models and guiding deployment decisions. In federated learning (FL), assessing the performance is challenging because data are distributed across participants. Consequently, the coordinator must rely on locally computed evaluation metrics and aggregate them to assess the global model. A key challenge is that common aggregation strategies, such as weighted averaging based on the local samples per participant, do not always produce the same results as centralized evaluation. Existing definitions of performance evaluation are largely tailored to accuracy and do not generalize to other metrics, leading to inconsistencies between participant-based and centralized evaluation. However, such discrepancies are inconsistent with the FL objective and lead to a wrong calculation of the metric. To address this issue, we examine the underlying reasons for these discrepancies and propose FLAM, a performance evaluation method based on aggregatable measures that yields the same results as centralized evaluation without the need for a global test dataset.