HEDGEHOG: Hierarchical Evaluation of Drug Generators Through Rigorous Filtration

Molecule generation has emerged as a powerful computational tool for de novo drug design, enabling the exploration of chemical space beyond the limits of conventional virtual screening. The field has progressed rapidly, driven by advances in molecular representations, generative architectures, and target-aware modeling strategies. However, existing reviews typically address specific model families or application scenarios in isolation, rather than offering an integrated perspective on how these components collectively form a coherent generation workflow. In this review, we present a comprehensive evaluation of molecule generation models for de novo drug design, covering 82 methods across five deep generative frameworks, including recurrent neural network (RNN)- and Transformer-based models, variational autoencoders (VAEs), generative adversarial networks (GANs), flow-based models, and diffusion models. We first summarize widely used benchmarks and molecular representations, and then examine the methodological principles underlying both general and pocket-conditioned generation. A central contribution of this work is a systematic synthesis and comparative analysis of reported performance across commonly used benchmarks and evaluation metrics. We also summarize representative experimentally validated case studies. Looking ahead, we discuss future directions in standardized 3D data, interaction-aware generation, receptor flexibility, and multi-objective molecular design, with the aim of improving the reliability and experimental relevance of molecule generation. All collected benchmark resources, evaluation metrics, and model references are provided in a publicly accessible repository at https://github.com/JacklinGroup/molecule-generation-review.

Current molecular generation benchmarks emphasize task complexity, molecule novelty, and property alignment; they largely overlook a critical concern: the potential safety risks of AI-generated molecules. In practice, many generative models may produce molecules with toxic, reactive, or otherwise hazardous characteristics - posing hidden dangers that remain insufficiently addressed. To address this gap, we introduce MolSafeEval, a benchmark dedicated to evaluating and analyzing the safety risks of molecular generation. Unlike prior approaches that rely on narrow toxicity predictors, MolSafeEval integrates heterogeneous safety knowledge - ranging from toxicological databases to hazard rules - into a structured molecular safety knowledge graph. This graph serves as a foundation for large language model-based reasoning, enabling systematic detection and explanation of unsafe features in generated compounds. We further categorize molecular generative models into four representative task types - unconditional generation, property optimization, target protein-based design, and text-based generation - and provide standardized datasets and safety evaluation protocols for each. By systematically revealing the safety vulnerabilities of current generative approaches, MolSafeEval offers a new lens for benchmarking molecular models and provides essential guidance toward safer, more trustworthy molecular design.

Although generative models hold promise for discovering molecules with optimized desired properties, they often fail to suggest synthesizable molecules that improve upon the properties of the structures represented in the training distribution. We find that this limitation arises not only from the molecule generation process itself, but also from the poor generalization capabilities of molecular property predictors. We address this challenge by creating a closed-loop molecule generation pipeline with iterative retraining on new quantum chemical simulation data. Compared against static, single-pass generative modeling approaches, only our closed-loop iterative workflow generates molecules with properties extending beyond the training distribution (up to 0.44 standard deviations beyond the original range) and achieves a 79% improvement in out-of-distribution molecule classification accuracy. Furthermore, by conditioning molecular generation on thermodynamic stability data obtained during the iterative loop, the proportion of stable and hence potentially synthesizable molecules generated is 3.5x higher than the next-best model.