RegNetAgents: A Multi-Agent Framework for Cross-Network Regulatory Driver Identification in Cancer Genomics

Orchestra composes two independently built bioinformatics MCP servers -- RegNetAgents, which infers gene regulatory network topology from ARACNe networks, and CASCADE, which supplies four independent evidence sources (LINCS knockdown, DepMap essentiality, super-enhancer status, DoRothEA transcription-factor confidence) -- into one multi-agent workflow exposed via the Model Context Protocol. Its central architectural claim is that requiring RegNetAgents' topology evidence and CASCADE's experimental evidence to agree on a candidate regulator yields a more trustworthy candidate than either alone -- not previously tested directly, since RegNetAgents' own validation asked only whether its candidate lists beat chance. We test this on the TCGA tumor-acquired regulator tier (regulators in a gene's tumor ARACNe network but absent from the GREmLN population-averaged baseline), selecting candidates by ARACNe mutual-information (MI) edge weight. On RegNetAgents' published BRCA/COAD focal-gene panel plus matched negative controls, agreement among at least 2 of the 4 CASCADE sources predicts OncoKB cancer-gene status among focal genes (odds ratio 2.89, Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted p=0.0166) but not among negative controls (p=0.0721); a single source is not diagnostic for either group. The pattern replicates and strengthens in a third cancer type, STAD, on a separately constructed panel (odds ratio 5.82), and against an independently curated ground truth (the Sanger COSMIC Cancer Gene Census). MI edge weight is the strongest single predictor overall (p=0.0003); a logistic-regression likelihood-ratio test confirms corroboration adds value beyond it in both panels (p=0.0234; p=0.0001). Every experiment invokes Orchestra's real agentic entry point.

CASCADE is an agentic framework that predicts downstream transcriptional effects of gene perturbation from precomputed ARACNe regulatory networks, exposed via MCP. Prior work validates such tools by checking whether predicted genes are known cancer genes (membership); we instead test whether the predicted direction of change matches reality, using focal-gene copy-number amplification as a dosage-based proxy for the inverse of knockdown against real TCGA patient tumor data. For MYC, CASCADE's predicted knockdown targets show strong concordance with real amplified-vs-non-amplified tumor expression across three cancer types (BRCA: 90.0%, COAD: 72.0%, STAD: 85.7%; all p<0.0013), well above permutation baselines, surviving a PAM50 subtype control and replicating in an independent cohort (METABRIC, 87.2%). Compared against curated MSigDB gene-set baselines via Fisher's exact test, CASCADE's accuracy is not shown to exceed existing public knowledge of MYC- or E2F-driven biology, though its gene-specific direction-calling clearly outperforms a naive uniform guess. Extending to fifteen additional genes, validation proves gene-specific rather than universal: proliferation-machinery regulators mostly replicate, while lineage-identity transcription factors and one cyclin-D paralog (CCND2) consistently fail, a pattern we discuss as a hedged, post-hoc hypothesis. We separately benchmark whether an LLM-based agent correctly grounds natural-language requests into CASCADE's real MCP tool calls. Across 35 queries, a documented local model reaches 71.4% exact match (85.7% for a larger model); schema and gene-alias failures are resolved by scale or server-side correction, but both models confidently default to the wrong perturbation type on ambiguous queries, a failure a targeted fix could not resolve because its trigger condition never occurs.

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are increasingly used to model biological systems, yet the reliability of post-hoc explanation methods for recovering meaningful molecular mechanisms remains unclear. Here, we systematically evaluate four widely used approaches: Saliency Attribution (SA), Integrated Gradients (IG), GNNExplainer, and Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) for identifying disease-relevant structure in breast cancer RNA-seq data projected onto a protein-protein interaction network. Using synthetic benchmarks with known ground-truth motifs, we show that explanation methods recover distinct signal organizations: SA performs best for sparse single-node drivers, whereas IG and LRP preferentially recover distributed pathway-like and cascade-like signals. In TCGA BRCA data, we identify a consistent topological signature of disease-associated hubs in which attribution peaks in the immediate 1-hop neighborhood and decays across successive network shells, a pattern most pronounced for IG and LRP and associated with strong enrichment of known cancer hubs. We further observe a trade-off between local hub enrichment and global gene ranking performance, with IG optimizing local enrichment and SA achieving superior global discrimination. Motivated by these complementary behaviors, we introduce a framework combining a shell-based hub score with consensus ranking across explainers. Consensus scores improve prioritization of canonical cancer genes (TP53, BRCA1, ESR1, MYC), reduce dependence on node degree, and, especially when tuned, outperform individual methods. Pathway enrichment further reveals improved recovery of biologically coherent cancer programs, including ERBB2, RTK, MAPK, immune, and cytokine signaling. Together, these results demonstrate that topology-aware integration of graph explanations can improve biological interpretability and biologically relevant molecular recovery.