cs.ITJul 18, 2026

Tight Sample Bounds for Renyi and Min-Entropy Estimation

Authors: Arman AdibiPiotr Krysta

Organizations: Department of Computer Science

Abstract

Estimating entropy from samples is fundamental in information theory and property testing. Shannon entropy measures average uncertainty and can be estimated to constant additive accuracy over a kk-symbol alphabet using Θ(k/logk)Θ(k/\log k) samples. Min-entropy depends only on the most likely symbol. Both are special cases of order-αα R'{e}nyi entropy, HαH_α. We characterize the sample complexity of estimating min-entropy and R'{e}nyi entropy for kk and integer α>1α>1; our lower bounds also hold for noninteger α1.001α\ge1.001. We prove that min-entropy estimation to constant additive accuracy has sample complexity Θ(klogk)Θ(k\log k). The upper bound uses the largest empirical frequency and concentration via dyadic grouping. The matching lower bound hides a slightly heavier symbol at a uniformly random location. Thus, min-entropy requires Θ(log2k)Θ(\log^2 k) more samples than Shannon entropy and corrects a previously stated Θ(k/logk)Θ(k/\log k) characterization. For every integer 2αc0logk2\leα\le c_0\log k, we prove the matching fixed-accuracy bound Θc0(αk11/α)Θ_{c_0}(αk^{1-1/α}). Previous results gave Ωα(k11/α)Ω_α(k^{1-1/α}) for fixed integer α>1α>1 and Oc0(α2k11/α)O_{c_0}(α^2k^{1-1/α}) for all integer α>1α>1. Our upper bound analyzes an unbiased falling-factorial estimator based on αα-way collisions, while a hidden-heavy-coordinate construction gives the matching lower bound and shows that the factor αα is unavoidable. For every real 1.001αc0logk1.001\leα\le c_0\log k, we prove the uniform lower bound Ωc0(αk11/α)Ω_{c_0}(αk^{1-1/α}). Finally, since 0Hα(p)H(p)logk/(α1)0\le H_α(p)-H_\infty(p)\le\log k/(α-1), min-entropy uniformly approximates HαH_α when αα is a sufficiently large multiple of logk\log k. Combining this reduction with our min-entropy bounds gives Θε(klogk)Θ_\varepsilon(k\log k) sample complexity in the high-order regime.

Explore similar work

May 6, 2026cs.IT

Information-theoretic Limits of Learning and Estimation

Information theory plays a central role in establishing fundamental limits on what any learning or estimation algorithm can -- and cannot -- achieve, regardless of computational power. In this chapter, we provide an introduction to these connections. End-of-chapter exercises makes the material suitable for both classroom use and self-study. We begin by introducing concentration inequalities along with the notions of covering and packing in metric spaces, and the associated concept of metric entropy. These tools are essential for our analysis. We then introduce the learning-theoretic framework and derive upper bounds on generalization error in terms of metric entropy, Rademacher complexity, and the VC dimension, as well as mutual information and relative entropy. Finally we discuss the minimax estimation framework and establish lower bounds on minimax risk using Fano's inequality, yielding bounds in terms of relative entropy and covering and packing numbers. This manuscript contains preprint of a chapter under consideration for inclusion in the forthcoming third edition of Cover and Thomas's Elements of Information Theory, posted with permission from Wiley. It would follow the chapter posted at arXiv:2605.02989 . The table of contents of the new edition can be found at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L-m4oQEJw1PJhoxBeMwrrBD8S_HmvzMEkPbYvS24980/edit?usp=sharing . For feedback, please contact abbas@ee.stanford.edu.
Abbas El Gamal, Maxim Raginsky
May 22, 2026cs.DS

Entropy Equivalence Testing

We introduce the problem of \emph{entropy equivalence testing} for probability distributions, a relaxation of the well-studied closeness testing problem, where the distribution testing algorithm is now only required to distinguish, given samples from two unknown distributions p,qp,q and a parameter ε(0,1/2]\varepsilon \in(0,1/2], between p=qp=q and H(p)H(q)ε|H(p)-H(q)| \geq \varepsilon (where HH denotes the Shannon entropy). We provide a time- and sample-efficient algorithm for this task, showing that the optimal sample complexity for this task can be significantly lower than that of closeness testing. As an application, we leverage this result to provide the first non-trivial testing algorithm for (standard) closeness of low-degree \emph{Bayesian networks}, which significantly improves on either the sample or time complexity of a baseline based on full learning.
Clément L. Canonne, Yash Pote, Jonathan Scarlett +1
Jun 23, 2026math.ST

Sample complexity of unbalanced entropic OT

Optimal transport (OT) has become a central language for comparing probability measures, but exact balanced OT is often both too rigid for data with missing, created, or destroyed mass and subject to unfavorable high-dimensional sample complexity. Entropic regularization and unbalanced relaxations address these limitations in complementary ways. Entropy smooths the geometry, improves statistical behavior, and enables fast Sinkhorn-type algorithms, while unbalanced marginal penalties replace hard conservation constraints by divergence terms adapted to noisy empirical data. This paper studies the sample complexity of entropic unbalanced OT at the level of the optimal coupling, rather than only the scalar transport value. We develop a translation-invariant dual formulation, prove compactness and strong convexity properties for the intrinsic dual variables, and convert these geometric estimates into high-probability finite-sample bounds for empirical couplings. The results clarify why regularization is a practical necessity in machine learning applications: it softens the curse of dimensionality, reduces the number of samples needed for stable transport estimation, and keeps the resulting estimators compatible with scalable Sinkhorn-type solvers.
Francisco Andrade, Gabriel Peyré, Clarice Poon