CANDOR: Chance-Calibrated Discordance in Frozen Foundation Encoders

This version reports a reproducibility audit of the frozen-encoder experiments presented in version 1. The numerical discrimination results are reproducible from the preserved artifacts, but their original attribution to interferometric pretraining is not supported. The released checkpoint contains a nested model state that loads without missing parameters, whereas loading the outer checkpoint dictionary leaves almost the entire EfficientNet-B0 feature stack uninitialized. Preserved embeddings labelled as interferometric have norms of order $10^{-12}$, matching freshly initialized EfficientNet-B0 networks and differing by more than twelve orders of magnitude from the preserved ImageNet embeddings. A second, separately preserved near-zero embedding set produces almost the same IMS 4th-test anomaly scores ($r=0.987$) and record-level discrimination (AUC $0.9812$ versus $0.9818$). We therefore withdraw the causal claim that IMS performance demonstrates a morphological prior transferred from gravitational-wave instrumentation. We reanalyse the controlled IMS splits at matched observed false-positive rates and add multivariate classical signal baselines. The near-zero representations retain strong tail separation, particularly in the 2nd and 4th IMS runs, but this is now interpreted as an exploratory architecture-and-initialization effect coupled to Mahalanobis scoring. A separate PRONOSTIA audit shows that the original large warning times were induced by a lifetime-fraction baseline; under fixed-time evaluation, a ten-feature classical baseline outperforms the preserved encoder scores. These results illustrate how checkpoint provenance, finite-sample calibration, architecture, and target-domain baselines can create an appearance of cross-domain transfer. They also define the controls required before assigning physical meaning to frozen-representation anomaly scores.

Frozen foundation-model (FM) embeddings are increasingly used as off-the-shelf brain-MRI representations, on the assumption that they capture anatomy. We audit what they actually encode and find that acquisition site is a large, intrinsic component of the representation. Across two independent cohorts (ABIDE-I, ABIDE-II), three frozen 3-D encoders (brain-pretrained, CT-pretrained, and randomly initialized), and every network depth, site is linearly decodable at roughly 0.9 balanced accuracy at deep layers, exceeding the decodability of every clinical or demographic variable (sex, age, autism diagnosis) at every layer. The effect is intrinsic rather than learned: a randomly initialized encoder is already a ~0.9 site classifier on both cohorts and across three architecture families (Swin, ViT, ResNet), and site is decodable at ~0.95 directly from the raw downsampled image with no encoder, so the fingerprint reflects low-level image statistics that any encoder preserves rather than a product of pretraining. Residualizing measured population covariates leaves site decodability essentially unchanged, indicating an acquisition- rather than population-driven effect. A nonlinear probe matches the linear one, so the fingerprint is fully linearly accessible. The site subspace is removable post hoc by iterative null-space projection or ComBat (site decodability 0.94 -> 0.07/0.00), and is a site-attribution concern for shared or federated embeddings; but for dense segmentation this removal is not free, because site and anatomy occupy an entangled linear subspace (a matched-rank random-direction projection is Dice-neutral, whereas removing the site subspace is destructive). We recommend site-audited use of frozen brain-MRI FMs and release an open audit toolkit.

Routine CT interpretation is inherently comprehensive, capturing incidental findings across the entire scan volume. 3D CT foundation models could assist this process by providing generalizable representations of anatomy and pathology. To evaluate their diagnostic breadth, we benchmark ten frozen CT encoders across three cohorts of thoracic CT scans, including an unseen internal clinical dataset, using $k$-nearest neighbors, zero-shot prompting, and linear probing. We find no universal state-of-the-art, with rankings fluctuating significantly depending on the evaluation context. While models combining fine-grained image tokenization with vision-language alignment generally perform best, a lightweight supervised encoder remains highly competitive, demonstrating that explicit labels can effectively substitute for scale. Crucially, rather than model architecture, we observe that the primary determinant of performance is a physical bottleneck: a finding's detectability scales with its contrast against surrounding tissue and its spatial extent. Through controlled within-organ comparisons, we empirically demonstrate that widespread or high-contrast abnormalities, such as devices and effusions, are reliably recovered. Conversely, small, low-contrast focal lesions remain a persistent challenge across all evaluated encoders. We attribute this to the inherent limitations of globally pooled embeddings, suggesting that accurately representing small, low-contrast structures will require region- or lesion-level pretraining.