Attractor Geometry Determines the Identifiability Limits of System Discovery

Discovering governing equations from observational data remains a fundamental challenge in scientific modeling, particularly when the underlying mathematical structure is unknown. Traditional sparse identification methods like SINDy excel at discovering parsimonious models but require researchers to specify candidate basis functions a priori, a limitation that often leads to model failure when critical terms are omitted or when systems exhibit unconventional dynamics. Purely symbolic regression approaches offer unlimited flexibility but struggle with noise sensitivity and frequently produce overly complex, unstable equations. We present AutoSINDy, a hybrid Discovery-then-Solve framework that combines the exploratory power of symbolic regression with the robust sparsity-promoting capabilities of SINDy. Our method operates in three stages: (1) PySR-based symbolic regression discovers candidate functional forms from bootstrapped data chunks; (2) a curation pipeline decomposes, expands, and filters these expressions using collinearity analysis to construct a minimal yet comprehensive library; and (3) SINDy identifies sparse governing equations from this custom-tailored library. Extensive experiments across canonical nonlinear systems demonstrate that AutoSINDy consistently recovers ground-truth equations even under high observational noise, achieving a ground-truth recovery rate of 92.8% across all trials. Compared with standard SINDy using enriched libraries and standalone symbolic regression, AutoSINDy achieves higher predictive accuracy, superior generalization to unseen trajectories, and substantially lower symbolic complexity.

The deep learning revolution has spurred a rise in advances of using AI in sciences. Within physical sciences the main focus has been on discovery of dynamical systems from observational data. Yet the reliability of learned surrogates and symbolic models is often undermined by the fundamental problem of non-uniqueness. The resulting models may fit the available data perfectly, but lack genuine predictive power. This raises the question: under what conditions can the systems governing equations be uniquely identified from a finite set of observations? We show, counter-intuitively, that chaos, typically associated with unpredictability, is crucial for ensuring a system is discoverable in the space of continuous or analytic functions. The prevalence of chaotic systems in benchmark datasets may have inadvertently obscured this fundamental limitation. More concretely, we show that systems chaotic on their entire domain are discoverable from a single trajectory within the space of continuous functions, and systems chaotic on a strange attractor are analytically discoverable under a geometric condition on the attractor. As a consequence, we demonstrate for the first time that the classical Lorenz system is analytically discoverable. Moreover, we establish that analytic discoverability is impossible in the presence of first integrals, common in real-world systems. These findings help explain the success of data-driven methods in inherently chaotic domains like weather forecasting, while revealing a significant challenge for engineering applications like digital twins, where stable, predictable behavior is desired. For these non-chaotic systems, we find that while trajectory data alone is insufficient, certain prior physical knowledge can help ensure discoverability. These findings warrant a critical re-evaluation of the fundamental assumptions underpinning purely data-driven discovery.

Data-driven identification of partial differential equations (PDEs) relies on sparse regression over a candidate library of differential operators, where larger libraries inflate false positives under observation noise and smaller libraries risk missing true terms. We introduce Equivariant Operator Discovery (EqOD), a fully automatic method combining two library reduction mechanisms. When Galilean invariance is detected from trajectory data via a weak-form structural test, EqOD uses the symmetry-reduced library, eliminating terms that our Galilean exclusion result proves to be absent from the governing equation. Otherwise, it applies randomized LASSO stability selection guided by classical false-positive bounds. A residual-based fallback prevents degradation below the full-library baseline. On 8 PDEs at 4 noise levels, EqOD attains $F_1 = 1.000 \pm 0.000$ on Heat at $20\%$ noise, where WF-LASSO obtains $0.475 \pm 0.181$, official PySINDy 2.0 obtains $0.000$, and the WSINDy reimplementation obtains $0.789$. Under the strict criterion that the mean F1 difference exceeds the larger of the two standard deviations, EqOD wins 7 of 32 cells. WF-LASSO wins none, and the remaining 25 cells are ties. Across all 32 cells, EqOD outperforms PySINDy 2.0.0 in 23 of 32 cells, and all 5 PySINDy wins occur on reaction PDEs. External validation on WeakIdent and PINN-SR datasets gives $F_1 = 1.000$ on all 5 clean benchmarks. NLS, 2D, coupled-system, and cylinder-wake extensions are reported. The Galilean library reduction is proved under explicit autonomy and library assumptions. The stability-selection step is motivated by classical false-positive bounds, while formal guarantees for correlated PDE design matrices remain open.