Abstract
Neural network misclassifications exhibit characteristic spectral instability in internal activations that is invisible at the output layer. This phenomenon is identified and formalized as Spectral Drift -- the frequency-domain distance between consecutive layer activations -- with empirical validation showing that failures exhibit significantly higher drift than correct predictions (1.9% increase, p<0.001). This spectral signature emerges during internal processing but becomes masked in final outputs, explaining why confidence-based detection methods struggle. This work introduces Self-Detecting Neural Networks (SDNN), a framework that monitors spectral dynamics across network depth using Short-Time Fourier Transform, wavelet decomposition, and statistical moments to capture multi-scale spectral features. A lightweight detector network (5% parameter overhead) learns to identify failure-indicative patterns via curriculum learning on progressively challenging distributions: natural misclassifications, distribution shifts, and adversarial perturbations. Experiments on CIFAR-10 demonstrate that SDNN achieves 79.0 +/- 25.3% AUROC across three seeds, substantially outperforming confidence-based baselines including MaxSoftmax (50.5%) and Energy Score (52.9%) by approximately 25-30 percentage points. Ablation studies reveal that wavelet decomposition and statistical features make consistent contributions, while STFT's role remains unclear. This work establishes spectral analysis of internal activations as a promising direction for neural network reliability, revealing diagnostic information inaccessible to output-based approaches.
Explore similar work
May 19, 2026cs.LG
Fault detection for Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has received increasing attention in recent years. While more advanced hybrid approaches have been proposed to combine multiple sources of information and outperform earlier techniques, they often incur substantial computational overhead, limiting scalability and practicality in real-world settings. In this paper, we introduce Concept-Aware Fault Detection (CAFD), a learning-based approach that achieves superior fault detection performance by effectively integrating multiple information sources while maintaining practical efficiency. Specifically, CAFD is trained using a carefully selected set of informative features, including model-based signals derived from the DNN's outputs, distance-based features, and a novel concept-based feature, called Concept Failure Ratio (CFR). CFR leverages Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to extract textual concepts from images and quantify the likelihood that their presence is associated with DNN failures. By incorporating this feature, CAFD benefits from complementary semantic information, enabling more effective fault detection. Our results demonstrate that CFR serves as an effective indicator for DNN fault detection. We conduct an extensive empirical evaluation of CAFD, comparing it against five state-of-the-art baselines across three subject DNN models and datasets, including ImageNet. Across a wide range of constrained selection budgets, CAFD consistently outperforms all baselines in Fault Detection Rate (FDR), achieving average FDR improvements of 18.3% across all investigated subjects and budget sizes.
Amin Abbasishahkoo, Mahboubeh Dadkhah, Lionel Briand
May 20, 2026cs.LG
Deep neural networks have achieved impressive performance on a variety of tasks, but their brittleness to distributional shifts remains a significant barrier to real-world deployment. In this paper, we propose a framework to analyse and quantify the distributional robustness of neural networks by studying the interactions between layer weights and activations. We model these interactions using Bernoulli distributions, using the separation between classes as a diagnostic proxy for robustness. We demonstrate the usefulness of this framework through models trained on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. We show that our proposed metrics can distinguish between networks that have memorised their training data and those that have not. We also perform analogous experiments in the activation space and find that the same properties do not hold up. Additionally, we investigate the behaviour of our metrics under various distribution shifts and show that these shifts reduce separation under our path-based diagnostics. Our results suggest that this framework provides useful model-level diagnostics of representation structure and robustness.
Divij Khaitan, Subhashis Banerjee
Jul 22, 2026cs.LG
With the widespread deployment of deep neural networks (DNNs) in safety-critical domains, reducing the cost of model validation under limited testing budgets has become increasingly important. Existing test case prioritization techniques often rely on single-checkpoint confidence signals derived from output probabilities. However, DNNs can be confidently wrong, and the confidence margin between the predicted and competing classes is frequently small, which weakens early fault discovery. To address this limitation, we propose a Neural-Collapse-Inspired Prioritization (NCIP) framework that replaces absolute confidence with cross-checkpoint prediction variability in the terminal training regime, where model geometry becomes highly structured. NCIP introduces two key components. First, it selects an NC-guided representative subset of training checkpoints using an equiangularity score of classifier weights, quantified as the standard deviation of pairwise cosine similarities among class weight vectors. Second, it prioritizes test inputs by their prediction variability across the selected checkpoints, surfacing boundary-adjacent and failure-prone samples that are unstable under checkpoint-induced decision boundary shifts. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets and architectures show that NCIP achieves strong performance in early fault discovery compared with competitive baselines, with 1.5 to 16.6 percent RAUC-ALL gains and 4.9 to 20.6 percent RAUC-500 gains under the same testing budget. NCIP further attains the best average performance across all dataset-model pairs.
Chunyu Liu, Mingyuan Li, Yang Li +4