Universal BCI Personalization: One API for Frozen EEG Trunks and Foundation Models

Scaling EEG foundation models requires pooling data across heterogeneous electrode montages, a prerequisite both for larger pretraining corpora and for downstream deployment. We present the first systematic comparison of four channel adaptation methods (Conv1d projection, spherical spline interpolation (SSI), source-space decomposition, and Riemannian re-centering) across five pretrained EEG foundation models (5M--157M parameters), five downstream tasks, and two training regimes with 10--15 random seeds each. We find that rigid-montage models (BENDR, Neuro-GPT) require external adaptation, while flexible models (EEGPT, CBraMod) match or exceed it natively when fine-tuned but benefit from external methods under frozen-encoder deployment. A probe-SFT asymmetry exists: external adaptation can cause severe negative transfer during fine-tuning of flexible models. The optimal method is architecture-dependent (Conv1d for BENDR, SSI/Riemannian for Neuro-GPT, source-space decomposition for depression detection), and 5M-parameter CBraMod outperforms models up to 31$\times$ larger on 4/5 datasets, consistent with independent findings that compact EEG-specific architectures can match larger models.

Electroencephalography (EEG) is the cornerstone of non-invasive brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), yet conventional decoding relies on fragmented, task-specific architectures that severely limit cross-task scalability. While EEG foundation models pre-trained on massive corpora promise universal brain decoding, current post-training depends on task-isolated fine-tuning. This static paradigm restricts knowledge transfer across heterogeneous tasks, hinders model scalability, and incurs computational and storage overheads that scale linearly with task count. To overcome these bottlenecks, we formulate downstream adaptation as a cross-task continual learning problem and propose EvoBrain, a dynamic, task-aware continual learning framework for unified EEG decoding. EvoBrain addresses the plasticity-stability trade-off via two complementary components: (1) Neuro-Spectral Task Normalization (NSN) aligns incoming tasks with historical statistics while recalibrating spectral responses to handle distributional and neuro-spectral shifts; and (2) Response-Affinity Distillation (RAD), combined with time-dependent replay, preserves old-task response geometry and promotes selective knowledge transfer between spectrally compatible tasks, effectively mitigating forgetting. Extensive evaluations across six distinct BCI tasks demonstrate that EvoBrain consistently surpasses state-of-the-art methods across diverse foundation backbones, optimally balancing plasticity and stability. To our knowledge, this work pioneers cross-task continual learning in the EEG domain, advancing the realization of a unified, one-for-all brain decoding system.

Electroencephalography (EEG) decoding for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) faces a major challenge: substantial inter-subject variability limits effective cross-subject generalization. Consequently, practical systems still rely largely on subject-specific models trained from scratch and requiring individual recalibration. EEG foundation models have recently emerged as a promising alternative; however, even large pretrained models cannot simply be used as fixed feature extractors and still require additional adaptation before they can be reliably applied to downstream tasks. In this work, we address this challenge through targeted adaptation strategies. Building on recent EEG foundation models such as REVE, LaBraM, and LUNA, we examine the impact of different low-rank adaptation strategies on motor imagery classification. We propose a framework that structurally decouples subject-invariant knowledge from subject-specific neural signatures: the low-rank update at each adapted layer is split into a Global adapter, trained jointly across all subjects, and Subject-Specific adapters, each absorbing individual variability. To assess the contribution of each path, we compare three adaptation strategies: (i) subject-specific LoRA (ii) global LoRA and (iii) stacked LoRA, combining both Global and Subject Specific adapters. Experiments on BCI Competition IV-2a, PhysioNet Motor Imagery, and the clinical Zuo2025 benchmark show that Stacked LoRA effectively mitigates inter-subject variability, achieving the best accuracy in the large majority of backbone and dataset combinations. Our analysis further reveals that the optimal balance between the global and subject-specific paths depends on the target population: a shared adapter is sufficient for large, diverse cohorts, whereas subject-specific adaptation is decisive under the high inter-session variability of clinical recordings.