Dementia Etiology Diagnosis via Collaborative Meta Knowledge Enhancement

Dementia diagnosis requires integrating multi-modal clinical assessments from diverse informants and clinicians under incomplete and heterogeneous data conditions. Yet most AI-driven approaches remain Alzheimer's disease (AD)-centric, framing the problem as binary AD detection or three-stage AD progression modeling within well-curated research settings. This pathology-driven paradigm overlooks the broader, syndrome-level nature of dementia, which spans multiple stages, phenotypes, and etiologies. In this paper, we propose Dementia-Agents, a clinically aligned multi-agent framework for real-world dementia staging and phenotyping. The framework follows a three-step workflow: (1) a data agent translates structured clinical records into semantically faithful textual representations that preserve missing-data signals and routes them to domain-aligned experts; (2) five fine-tuned expert agents generate domain-level predictions; and (3) a coordinator agent performs probabilistic aggregation to produce final staging and phenotyping decisions. We develop and evaluate Dementia-Agents on a real-world clinical cohort of 1,066 patients from two cognitive neurology services. Compared with monolithic multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) and prior medical multi-agent systems, our approach achieves consistent improvements in diagnostic performance for real-world syndrome-level dementia staging and phenotyping, while preserving domain-level interpretability.

Deep learning models in medical imaging typically operate as parametric memory, diagnosing patients by recalling fixed knowledge learned during training. This contrasts sharply with clinical practice, where physicians employ analogical reasoning to diagnose new cases by referencing similar records from past exemplars. While In-Context Learning (ICL) frameworks such as Tabular Prior-Fitted Networks (TabPFN) offer a promising diagnosis-by-reference paradigm, they are designed with tabular-specific inductive priors and rely on non-differentiable preprocessing pipelines, leading to manifold mismatch and gradient fracture when applied to heterogeneous multimodal data. To address these limitations, we propose PromptDx, a novel diagnosis-by-reference framework that leverages a pre-trained TabPFN as an ICL engine while enabling seamless integration with multimodal representations. Our core contribution is a Differentiable Prompt Tuning (DPT) mechanism that aligns a Masked Multimodal Modeling module with the pre-trained ICL engine. By training a lightweight adapter as a differentiable surrogate for the engine's non-differentiable preprocessors, we enable an end-to-end optimization of multimodal prompts within the ICL paradigm. We validate our method on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset using 3D MRI and tabular biomarkers. Experiments demonstrate that our approach outperforms traditional parametric baselines. Notably, our method achieves superior performance using only 1% context samples compared to 30% in standard ICL, demonstrating exceptional manifold condensation ability. We further validate the generalizability of our DPT framework across six tabular datasets with diverse scales. Overall, our method offers a more data-efficient and clinically aligned paradigm for Alzheimer's Disease diagnosis.

Dementia is a major and growing global health burden, with Alzheimer's disease (AD) accounting for most cases. Timely and accurate diagnosis is central to managing this burden and increasingly depends on integrating complementary clinical and imaging information. Multimodal deep learning can combine these modalities for AD diagnosis, but how its explanations behave across modalities, fusion strategies, and cohorts remains unclear. We developed an explainable multimodal framework pairing a 3D CNN encoder for T1-weighted MRI with a feedforward network for harmonized clinical and demographic data, comparing varied model setups on three-way and pairwise diagnostic tasks using 6,479 internal records from the ADNI and 1,703 independent records from the OASIS-3. On ADNI, the tabular-only model achieved the highest three-class AUC-ROC of 0.879 and best discriminated cognitively normal (CN) versus mild cognitive impairment (MCI; 0.903), while cross-attention performed best for MCI versus AD (0.861); CN versus AD was highly discriminative overall. On OASIS-3, the vision-only model performed best (three-class AUC-ROC 0.910); CN versus MCI remained difficult, and no fusion strategy consistently outperformed single modalities across tasks and cohorts. SHAP and Integrated Gradients identified the MMSE as the dominant tabular feature in both cohorts, with global feature rankings agreeing strongly in ADNI ($\rho=0.94$) and OASIS-3 ($\rho=0.96$); CAM-based explanations, however, changed with model configuration and cohort. These findings show that multimodal performance and explanations are task, modality, fusion, and cohort-dependent: a dominant cognitive signal persisted across cohorts, but feature contributions and CAM explanations did not, underscoring the need to evaluate explainability under cohort shift rather than as a stable, intrinsic property.