math.COJul 25, 2026

Exact values and exact upper bounds for families of integers with arithmetic progression intersections (Erdős Problem #272)

Authors: Zhanfu Yang

Abstract

Let t(N)t(N) be the largest tt for which there exist distinct sets A1,,At{1,,N}A_1,\dots,A_t \subseteq \{1,\dots,N\} such that AiAjA_i \cap A_j is a nonempty arithmetic progression for all iji \neq j (Erdos Problem #272). Simonovits and Sos proved t(N)=O(N2)t(N)=O(N^2) and conjectured (N2)+1\binom{N}{2}+1 is best possible; Szabo disproved this by a construction giving t(N)(N2)+1+(N1)/4t(N) \geq \binom{N}{2}+1+\lfloor(N-1)/4\rfloor, proved the asymptotics t(N)=N2/2+O(N5/3(logN)3)t(N)=N^2/2+O(N^{5/3}(\log N)^3), and asked whether t(N)=(N2)+O(N)t(N)=\binom{N}{2}+O(N) and whether some element lies in all sets of any extremal family (the kernel question). We determine t(N)t(N) exactly for all 3N123 \leq N \leq 12 by exhaustive computation: in this entire range Szabo's lower bound is exact, and we conjecture that t(N)=(N2)+1+(N1)/4t(N)=\binom{N}{2}+1+\lfloor(N-1)/4\rfloor for every NN. Towards the matching upper bound we prove, for every NN, that Szabo's bound is the exact maximum over all families with a common element (starred families). The proof combines a self-contained ``defect-one'' counting inequality for staircase regions with a new structural theorem: every non-progression member of such a family contains a bad pair that no other member can share. Consequently the sharpened conjecture reduces to a single remaining statement, namely Szabo's kernel conjecture that some element lies in all sets of an extremal family, and we prove first structural constraints on putative non-starred extremal families.

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Grokability in five inequalities

    May 6, 2026Paata Ivanisvili, Xinyuan XieInequalitiesConvex Sets