Chaos Is a LADDER: Domain Generalization Beyond Invariance via Reweighting

Domain generalization (DG) aims to learn a model from one or more source domains that generalizes to an unseen target domain without accessing target data during training. A common approach enforces invariance of representations across all source domains, assuming predictive structure is globally shared. However, we demonstrate that enforcing invariance across more domains gradually restricts the feasible representation space, discarding transferable predictive factors that are not universally shared. To address this limitation, we propose subset-shared invariance, where predictive structure is assumed stable only within domain subsets. We implement this principle with a mixture-of-experts architecture, where each expert aligns the specific domains it serves and a routing mechanism composes subset-invariant components for prediction. This creates a routing-conditioned invariance, jointly learned with the representation. To facilitate effective decomposition, we develop training objectives that encourage selective alignment, confident and balanced routing, and diverse expert specialization. Experiments on DomainBed benchmarks demonstrate improved out-of-domain generalization and greater robustness under increasing domain heterogeneity. Our results suggest that DG should move beyond enforcing a single global invariance and instead model invariance through partially shared structure across domain subsets.

Machine learning models often degrade when they are deployed on a target distribution that differs from the source distributions they were trained on. Recent work in causality-based domain generalization has shown how shared causal structure between domains can induce invariant predictors, e.g., models on a subset of features which have stable risk across structured domain shifts. However, the extent to which such population-level causal invariances can lead to gains in finite-sample settings remains underexplored. In particular, in practice we often have access to a few labeled target samples, a setting called supervised domain adaptation (sDA). In this paper, we explore when (full or partial) causal knowledge can provably improve supervised domain adaptation. As a first step, we study linear regression, where full or partial causal knowledge specifies a collection of invariant or possibly invariant feature subsets, each yielding a source-trained candidate predictor. We derive matching upper and lower bounds showing that finite-sample gains are governed by the target-risk margins separating the candidates, together with the finite-source estimation error. When these margins are sufficiently large relative to $n_Q$, an adaptive aggregation procedure can match the best candidate predictor while avoiding negative transfer relative to target-only learning. On the other hand, when the margins are too small, no algorithm can reliably exploit the candidate collection to obtain faster finite-sample rates. We further connect these margins to structural shift magnitude in linear SCMs and validate the theory on real-world causal benchmarks.

Prediction models trained under the source distribution do not generalize well to a different target distribution. A valid inference about an unseen data distribution must be anchored by the invariance of certain causal mechanisms that generate the source and target data, however, these structural invariances are non-identifiable from the source data alone. Under mild causal assumptions about the data, we show that the optimal prediction in the target is in fact partially identifiable by the source distribution. The result rests on a simple observation: In any domain, the optimal prediction can be factorized into what we call a pair of abduction and deduction maps, where the abduction map makes inference about some unobserved variables (possibly confounders) from the observed variables and the deduction map predicts the label using both the observed and inferred quantities. Access to large source data pins down the optimal prediction, thus constrains the valid abduction-deduction ensembles that produce it -- a non-identifiability that we call the abduction-deduction entanglement. To leverage this, we parameterize the constrained family using what we call a representation transplant, that is a specific linear transformation in the representation space that manipulates the abduction content of the representation while retaining the deduction component. Invariance of the causal mechanism generating the label implies existence of an invariant deduction map between source and target. Thus, we can search the space of plausible target distributions via a parametric transplant. We use this scheme in a learner-adversary game that, under an idealistic optimization, provably terminates with the learner having the minimax-optimal target prediction. Evaluations verify the theory, showing that the method is competitive in DG benchmarks.