MultivationBench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Sequential Motivation Reasoning

Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on visual reasoning benchmarks, yet it remains unclear to what extent such performance reflects reasoning directly grounded in visual evidence. We introduce VisReason, a benchmark for vision-centric reasoning in everyday scenarios where perception and inference are tightly coupled. VisReason contains 1,505 questions across 10 categories spanning perceptual, structural, and conceptual reasoning. Our evaluation shows that VisReason poses a qualitatively different challenge from existing benchmarks, exposing substantial gaps between humans and current MLLMs and revealing limited benefits from test-time reasoning strategies. VisReason offers a focused diagnostic for evaluating vision-centric reasoning beyond language.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse expert-level tasks, but they still struggle with fundamental abilities that humans naturally develop through continuous observation of the real world, such as spatial perception and dynamic reasoning. Recent studies have recognized this gap and introduced dedicated benchmarks to evaluate the spatial-temporal capabilities of MLLMs. However, existing benchmarks mostly focus on static scenes or require exact quantitative predictions, leaving intuitive reasoning from temporal cues largely underexplored. In this paper, we introduce the Visual Spatial-Temporal Reasoning Benchmark (ViSTR-Bench), a novel evaluation suite designed to systematically assess whether MLLMs can perform qualitative reasoning from continuous visual cues in dynamic scenes. Guided by the principles of temporal emphasis, reasoning orientation, and qualitative evaluation, ViSTR-Bench establishes a comprehensive four-dimensional evaluations covering Motion Perception, Spatial Relations, Outcome Prediction, and Physical Dynamics. The benchmark comprises 15 distinct subtasks and 1,340 high-quality video question-answer pairs spanning diverse tabletop, indoor, and outdoor scenarios. Extensive evaluations of a broad spectrum of state-of-the-art proprietary, open-source, and specialized spatial MLLMs reveal that, despite their strong general video understanding capabilities, current models still face substantial bottlenecks in complex spatial-temporal reasoning and remain far below human performance.

Recent advances in Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have greatly improved video understanding, yet their ability to reason about human-centered social situations remains limited. Existing benchmarks typically rely on videos with a single observed trajectory, making it difficult to determine whether models truly understand social dynamics or merely exploit recurring narrative patterns. We introduce SocialReasonBench, a video multiple-choice QA benchmark for evaluating socially grounded reasoning in scenarios derived from interactive narratives. Built from gameplay videos of Detroit: Become Human, the benchmark leverages branching storylines where player decisions lead to alternative social outcomes that can be checked against the game's own script, flowchart, and recorded branches. We develop a multi-agent curation pipeline that localizes socially meaningful clips, grounds answer labels in game-state signals, and generates theory-guided questions with diagnostic distractors. SocialReasonBench covers seven reasoning dimensions, including intent recognition, emotional empathy, moral dilemma, counterfactual reasoning, and causal antecedent. Experiments on contemporary LMMs show that models perform reasonably well on basic social understanding but struggle with counterfactual and causal reasoning. Further ablation and diagnostic error analyses reveal that models often depend on incomplete modality cues and fall into reasoning traps such as visual shortcuts, highlighting a gap between observable event recognition and deeper reasoning over latent social states.