Recognition and Label-Free Adaptation Across Recording Sessions in Surface-EMG Gesture Decoding
Authors: Jethro Odeyemi, W. J. Zhang
Organizations: Division of Biomedical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A9, Canada
Abstract
Recognition accuracy obtained during a recording session does not persist when a user puts on the electrodes again after the electrodes had previously been removed. The electrodes may have moved slightly, the skin may be drier or wetter, or the elbow may be positioned differently; these factors all contribute to day-to-day variability and therefore represent a major obstacle to implementing successful pattern-recognition based myoelectric control systems in daily practice. However, simply recalibrating a user's hand for 20 min at every doff/don event is a clearly unrealistic expectation. A montage-agnostic encoder built for cross-user, cross-montage transfer is trained here using data collected during a particular recording session, and then applied to data collected later in a different recording session without adjusting anything, on the ten intact subjects of NinaPro DB6. The performance of this approach is compared to that of a per-user LDA classification pipeline, and to that of two published approaches that only rely on source data collected from the same recording session. Carried unchanged across recording sessions, the encoder retains 0.688 macro-F1 against 0.540 for the per-user pipeline, and, on the per-window metric the published baselines use, sits above both published source-only results, a band of two points that locates the encoder rather than ranking it. Of five label-free test-time adaptations, only feature-statistic alignment improves every subject; batch-normalisation re-estimation, a standard method in the domain-adaptation literature, collapses this architecture entirely. Aligning the encoder's feature statistics to the new session recovers about what a single labelled calibration repetition would.
Pattern-recognition control promises a myoelectric prosthesis that responds to many intended gestures rather than one or two, but the promise has stayed in the laboratory. A recogniser trained on one person rarely transfers to the next, and useful performance usually demands a fresh round of labelled calibration from the end user. A montage-agnostic encoder is introduced that reads each electrode with shared weights and locates it by its physical coordinate rather than its index, so one architecture ingests any channel count without montage-specific parameters. Trained across users, it exceeds a per-user Hudgins and linear-discriminant classifier by 0.234 macro-F1 on DB1 for every held-out subject and by 0.108 on DB2, and falls below it on the ten-subject DB5. Each of the encoder's three key components individually accounts for more than half of its 3-shot macro F1 in an otherwise budget-matched ablation study. A controlled subject-count sweep shows the margin is close to flat from nine training subjects to thirty-nine, so the training pool binds only as a stability floor below which cross-user training fails to converge; what tracks the direction of the comparison across the three databases is instead the strength of the per-user baseline, which signal fidelity sets. Comparing against an LDA baseline depends on budget spent training models and on how good that baseline is, and self-supervised pretraining had no benefits once a supervised model was adequately trained.
Reliable long-term decoding of gestures from surface electromyography (EMG) is hindered by signal drift caused by electrode displacement, muscle fatigue, and/or posture changes. Although modern models achieve high intra-session accuracy, their performance often degrades substantially across recording sessions. Existing approaches to mitigate this problem typically rely on large training datasets or computationally intensive pipelines that are unsuitable for energy-efficient wearable devices. We propose a lightweight test-time adaptation framework for EMG decoding. The framework includes three complementary adaptation strategies: (i) causal adaptive batch normalization for online statistical alignment, (ii) Gaussian Mixture Model alignment with experience replay to mitigate forgetting, and (iii) meta-learning for rapid few-shot calibration. We evaluate these methods on the multi-session NinaPro DB6 dataset. All approaches substantially improve inter-session robustness relative to a non-adaptive baseline while maintaining low computational overhead. Replay-regularized statistical alignment provides the most stable adaptation under limited data, while meta-learning achieves the highest accuracy when sparse calibration labels are available. Overall, our self-supervised test-time adaptation methods reach up to 82% inter-session accuracy, significantly improving upon prior approaches while maintaining resource-efficient operation. These results demonstrate that lightweight test-time adaptation can enable robust, long-term EMG decoding for wearable or prosthetic applications.
High-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) gesture recognition supports prosthetic control, assistive robotics, and rehabilitation, but electrode re-donning and physiological variability cause distribution shifts that degrade accuracy across sessions and subjects. Generative HD-sEMG models primarily synthesize signals for augmentation; although diffusion models enhance representation learning, prediction still relies on a separate classifier. To tie learned dynamics to the decision rule, we propose MyoFlow, the first discriminative flow-matching framework for HD-sEMG recognition across sessions and subjects. It recasts classification as anchor-tied transport: a domain-conditioned rectified flow moves encoded windows toward gesture anchors that serve as transport targets and define the nearest-anchor decision geometry, enabling zero-shot prediction without an independent head. On the Hyser dataset, MyoFlow improves mean cross-session and cross-subject accuracy over the strongest diffusion-based baseline by 4.24% and 6.37%, respectively, and achieves 91.71% mean zero-shot accuracy and 97.39% mean few-shot accuracy across multiple days on the CEMHSEY dataset.