This paper presents an applied case study on hybrid visual attention estimation for human-robot interaction using an expressive robotic head based on the InMoov ecosystem. The proposed pipeline combines a fast geometric perception layer with an independent semantic perception layer based on a vision-language model. The geometric layer provides high-frequency face and head-pose information for temporal regulation, while the semantic layer receives only raw egocentric camera frames and produces contextual attention labels related to attention toward the robot, phone use, or attention elsewhere. These signals are integrated through a finite state machine that regulates adaptive interaction behavior, including activation, waiting, interaction resumption, and return to rest. The system was evaluated with 10 participants across 40 trials covering baseline and adaptive interaction conditions. Results show reliable interaction start across all trials, consistent pause behavior in the adaptive distraction condition, and non-redundant semantic information between the geometric and semantic outputs.
This paper describes an initiation of interaction(IoI) detection framework without keywords for human-robot interaction(HRI) based on audio and vision sensor fusion in a domestic environment. In the proposed framework, the robot has its own audio and vision sensors, and can employ external vision sensor for stable human detection and tracking. When the user starts to speak while looking at the robot, the robot can localize his or her position by its sound source localization together with human tracking information. Then the robot can detect the IoI if it perceives the face of the speaker faces the robot. In case that the user does not speak directly, the robot can also detect the IoI if he or she looks at the robot for more than predefined periods of time. A state transition model for the proposed IoI detection framework is designed and verified by experiments with a mobile robot. In order to implement and associate our model in a robot architecture, all the components are implemented and integrated in the Robot Operating System(ROS) environment.
Anticipating whether a person will interact from one's own perspective is a highly intuitive task for humans, that relies on a combination of cues. We investigate how humans perform at predicting a person's intention to interact from a service robot's point of view, using pose-only or full video input, then benchmark different lightweight pose-based models and state-of-the-art vision-language models. We conducted our benchmark on the HUI360 dataset on a fixed pilot subset of 100 test tracks (25 positive, 75 negative). We found that with pose-only input, human annotators outperform lightweight trained pose models but not by large margins (+0.08 in F1-Score). But when given full egocentric video with a target bounding box, human annotators perform substantially better and largely outperform the Vision-Language Models (+0.2 in F1-Score). We also compared VLMs of different size and under different input conditions, and found that the best results do not correlate with model size. Our result confirms that predicting interactions is a challenging task for social robots and that reasoning-capable models are necessary but their actual reasoning capabilities alone do not suffice to match the social intuition of humans.
This manuscript extends our previous multimodal human-robot interaction system by introducing a controlled ablation study of the three modules that most strongly influence end-to-end performance: the large language model used for action extraction, the perception system used for visual grounding, and the controller used for motion execution. The goal is not to redesign the full pipeline, but to isolate the contribution of each component under a common experimental protocol and then evaluate the best combinations end-to-end. We therefore compare three language models, five perception configurations, and three controllers, followed by a second-stage factorial study over the best candidates. The resulting analysis is intended to clarify which choices primarily affect execution time, which primarily affect success rate, and where the largest engineering gains are likely to come from in future revisions of the system.