Understanding Synergistic Interactions among Pathology Foundation Models via Adaptive Fusion
Authors: Yuxiang Xiao, Yang Hu, Bin Li, Tianyang Zhang, Zexi Li, Huazhu Fu, Jens Rittscher, Kaixiang Yang
Organizations: School of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, China · School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, UK · Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK · Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK · St Catherine’s CollegeUn, University of Oxford, UK · A*STAR, Singapore · Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, UK
Abstract
Pathology foundation models (PFMs) provide strong tile-level representations via self-supervised pre-training on large-scale pathology images. Yet, PFMs are developed under diverse and often opaque data, architecture, and objective choices, inducing latent representational biases that limit robustness and obscure what each model specialises in. We present AdaFusion, a lightweight adaptive fusion framework that integrates complementary signals from multiple frozen PFMs through (1) low-dimensional feature compression and (2) a sample-conditioned gating module that reweights model-wise (and optionally channel-wise) contributions. Beyond improving predictive accuracy, AdaFusion provides contribution-driven interpretation that offers evidence consistent with model-specific preferences and synergistic interactions across tissue phenotypes. We evaluate AdaFusion on three public benchmarks spanning treatment response prediction, prostate cancer grading, and spatial gene expression inference. AdaFusion consistently outperforms individual PFMs and other fusion baselines, while providing interpretable tissue visualisation which aligns model preferences with morphological patterns. Code is available at: https://github.com/xyx-98/PathoOracle.
Pathology foundation models (PFMs) have advanced rapidly in recent years and support training classifiers for a range of histopathology tasks. However, their robustness across hospitals remains limited: performance often degrades when training a classifier on data from one hospital and evaluating it on another target hospital. We address this challenge by fine-tuning PFMs with a local maximum mean discrepancy (LMMD) objective that applies to two settings: domain adaptation, where unlabeled target-hospital data is available, and domain generalization, where target-hospital data is unavailable at all. Experiments at both the patch- and slide-level show consistent improvements across multiple PFMs and tasks.
Pathology foundation models (FMs) produce powerful tile-level representations which remain sensitive to scanner and staining variability, undermining deployment across laboratories. We develop a novel fine-tuning recipe that improves the robustness of pathology FMs to acquisition factors. Applied to ten different FMs, our fine-tuning strategy consistently improves robustness for every model as well as downstream performance, with no observed trade-off. On average, it raises the PathoROB robustness index by 23% (from 0.72 to 0.87) and increases the overall cross-benchmark performance by 43% on Patho-Bench, HEST and THUNDER combined, with individual gains reaching up to 72% in robustness (Phikon-v2) and 76% in performance (Midnight-12k). We publicly release the fine-tuned versions of Phikon-v2 (Phaet) and Midnight-12k (Mascaret) at https://huggingface.co/wearewaiv/models.
Alexandre Filiot, Oskar Thaeter, Benoit Schmauch +1
Foundation models (FMs) have emerged as powerful representation extractors for medical data, yet their generalizability to datasets under distribution shift remains underexplored. This work systematically evaluates FM-based representations on a suite of computational pathology tasks across two real-world commercial cohorts, IH-BC and IH-NSCLC, drawn from the licensed in-house (IH) oncology dataset. The analysis focuses on two modalities, whole-slide images and transcriptomic profiles, drawn from the IH multimodal data. We first benchmark unimodal probing performance across five FMs on eight downstream classification tasks, and find that image and omics representations carry complementary predictive signals. Then we investigate whether multimodal fusion can yield additional gains over unimodal baselines by comparing three image-omics fusion strategies built on paired representations. The trustworthiness of selected unimodal and multimodal pipelines is further assessed through conformal prediction. Our results show that FM representations achieve competitive performance on out-of-distribution data and that multimodal fusion helps mainly when no single modality dominates the signal. Conformal prediction reveals that in the majority of cases where a point prediction fails, the true diagnosis remains recoverable within the prediction set, reinforcing the value of uncertainty-aware inference for clinical support.