Constrained Co-Design for Photonic Bayesian Neural Networks
Authors: Hendrik Borras, Xiao Wang, Bernhard Klein, Robin Janssen, Frank Brückerhoff-Plückelmann, Wolfram Pernice, Holger Fröning
Organizations: Hardware and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Institute of Computer Engineering, Heidelberg University, Germany · Neuromorphic Quantumphotonics Kirchhoff-Institute for Physics, Heidelberg University, Germany
Abstract
Classical neural networks frequently produce overconfident predictions on ambiguous or out-of-distribution (OOD) data, a liability that grows with each AI system deployed in safety-critical real-world scenarios. Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) provide a principled framework for uncertainty-aware prediction by replacing deterministic parameters with probability distributions, but repeated sampling increases latency, memory traffic, and energy consumption. Photonic probabilistic computing offers a promising alternative by exploiting intrinsic optical stochasticity for fast and parallel sampling. However, photonic BNNs are not ideal samplers: analog constraints on quantization, programming error, dynamic range, and representable mean and variance restrict the variational families that can be implemented in hardware. In this work, we study which hardware-imposed constraints limit scalable photonic BNN inference, how these constraints can be represented, and which ranges can be tolerated by photonic BNNs beyond small proof-of-concept networks. We formulate photonic BNN inference as constrained stochastic variational inference and perform a systematic ablation study over stochasticity location, stochasticity modality, quantization, programming error, and mean/variance bounds. From these results, we derive concrete co-design guidelines that distinguish hardware constraints that can be compensated by training from those requiring hardware or architecture intervention. We validate these guidelines under coupled, hardware-realistic constraints on Dirty-MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CINIC-10, using Fashion-MNIST and SVHN as OOD benchmarks, showing that hardware-aware training recovers predictive performance and uncertainty quality whenever the required variational family remains representable, whereas violations of representational limits require targeted hardware modifications.
Physical noise in near-term quantum hardware is usually treated as a nuisance to suppress. We ask whether it can instead act as a hardware-native regularizer for photonic hybrid quantum-classical neural networks (PHQCNNs), analogous to noise-injection regularization in classical deep learning. Using Quandela's Perceval simulator and the MerLin framework, we build PHQCNNs for Iris, Digits, and MNIST and inject Perceval's seven-parameter physical noise model directly into training. A genetic algorithm searches the six continuous noise dimensions and 1 boolean parameter to find, per dataset, the configuration maximizing validation accuracy, compared against a noiseless baseline across five seeds. GA-tuned noise yields modest accuracy gains on Iris (+0.82pp) and Digits (+1.45pp), but a clear degradation on MNIST (-1.21pp). Per-parameter sweeps show that no individual noise parameter is consistently beneficial, motivating the joint search, while a second-order loss expansion shows that physical noise induces a Tikhonov-like regularization term whose effect is dataset-dependent. Physical photonic noise can thus act as a free regularizer, but not universally.
Farah Elnakhal, Alberto Marchisio, Nouhaila Innan +2
Photonic quantum computing is a promising platform for scalable quantum machine learning, but designing effective hybrid architectures remains challenging under hardware and optimization constraints. Existing approaches rely on manually tuned architectures that fail to account for the collaboration between classical preprocessing, phase encoding, and photonic circuit structure, limiting both accuracy and hardware compatibility. In this paper, we propose a neural architecture search framework for hybrid photonic quantum-classical models that combines genetic algorithm-based search with learnable quantum phase encoding to systematically explore the joint design space of classical and quantum components. Our framework encodes 19 hyperparameters across six gene groups and evolves a population of hybrid architectures using group-based crossover, per-gene mutation, and elitism, evaluating each candidate on a short training budget before full retraining of the best found design. We evaluate our framework on two image classification benchmarks, Digits and MNIST, achieving final validation accuracies of 99.44% and 98.78%, respectively, with first-principles execution time estimates on the Quandela Ascella photonic QPU projecting single-image inference at 67 ms (Digits) and 149 ms (MNIST). Our quantum contribution analysis further shows that the photonic layer extracts non-redundant features orthogonal to the classical pathway, providing a measurable accuracy advantage over classical-only baselines. Our results demonstrate that automated architecture search is both practical and impactful for hybrid photonic systems, opening the way for systematic design space exploration of quantum AI on photonic devices.
Farah Elnakhal, Alberto Marchisio, Nouhaila Innan +2
The practical adoption of sampling-based inference (SAI) in Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) remains limited, partly due to persistent misconceptions about the feasibility and efficiency of sampling. This position paper argues that SAI has achieved computational parity with optimization-based methods and is at the verge of superseding such methods for effective and efficient inference in BNNs. This development should be in the interest of the whole community, promoting BNNs as a principled paradigm with its long-standing yet unfulfilled promise of providing principled uncertainty quantification for neural networks. SAI can even do more -- yielding superior prediction performance through model averaging, serving as the foundation for a plethora of possible downstream tasks, and providing crucial insights into the landscape of BNNs. In order to make such a change happen and unfold the potential of sampling, overcoming current misconceptions is a necessary first step. The next step is to realign research efforts toward addressing remaining challenges in SAI. In particular, the community must focus on two core problems: sufficient exploration of the posterior landscape and high-fidelity distillation of posterior samples for efficient downstream inference. By addressing conceptual and practical obstacles, we can unlock the full potential of SAI and establish it as a central tool in Bayesian deep learning.