cs.LGAug 2, 2026

Sphere Retraction Normalizations

Authors: Jie ZhangCheng-Fang SuYi-Jui HuangMin-Te Sun

Organizations: Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Central University, Taiwan · Department of Applied Mathematics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan · Department of Mathematics, National Central University, Taiwan

Abstract

Residual connections are the de facto mechanism for training deep neural networks stably. Geodesic Normalization (GeoNorm) recasts them on a Riemannian manifold, orthogonalizing each layer output against the current hidden state and applying the resulting update through the Riemannian exponential map. Every hidden state thus keeps a constant 2\ell_{2}-norm, confining the residual stream to a hypersphere. The exponential map, however, is only one member of a broad family of retraction maps. We show that on the hypersphere this entire family collapses to a single scalar design choice. What distinguishes one retraction from another is only how the magnitude of an update is converted into a rotation angle within the plane spanned by the hidden state and the update. This view places Euclidean residual connections and GeoNorm in one framework. Instantiating it with the metric projection retraction and the Cayley retraction yields Proj-SpheretNorm and Cay-SpheretNorm, which are exactly norm-preserving yet require only algebraic operations. Both prove to be members of a one-parameter family of angular retractions, pp-SpheretNorm, whose rotation angle saturates rather than growing without bound. The two methods above are recovered exactly at p=1p = 1 and p=2p = 2, while the identity map and GeoNorm arise only as limits at either end. On nanoGPT, all three methods outperform existing lightweight deep connection schemes, and the best validation loss is attained at finite pp, indicating that the exponential map is not the preferred retraction for spherical residual streams but merely one end of a spectrum.

Explore similar work

Feb 18, 2021cs.LG

Deep Residual Networks Learn the Geodesic Curve in the Wasserstein Space

Recent studies revealed the mathematical connection between deep neural networks (DNNs) and dynamic systems. However, the specific dynamics that DNNs, especially deep residual networks (ResNets), tend to learn during training remain insufficiently characterized. To this end, we model the forward propagation of deep residual networks using continuity equations, in which the measure is conserved and infinite curves in the measure space connect the input distribution to the output one of a ResNet. We find ResNets with L2L_2 regularization attempt to learn the geodesic curve in the Wasserstein space, induced by the optimal transport map. Compared with plain networks, ResNets can better approximate the geodesic curve, which explains why ResNets can be optimized and generalize better. Numerical experiments show that the data tracks of a ResNet tend to be line-shaped in terms of the line-shape score, and the map learned by a ResNet is closer to the optimal transport map in terms of the optimal transport score. In a word, we conclude that ResNets learn the geodesic curve in the Wasserstein space and discretely engineer the data transformation in high-dimensional spaces.
Kuo Gai, Shihua Zhang
May 4, 2026cs.LG

Geometric and Spectral Alignment for Deep Neural Network I

Deep residual architectures are modeled as products of near-identity Jacobians. This paper proves deterministic quotient-geometric estimates for singular spectra of Frobenius-normalized layer factors, emphasizing a normalized top-radial Cartan coordinate and fitted power-law chart. Full-rank factors are mapped from GL(d)\mathrm{GL}(d) to the positive cone by AAAA\mapsto A^\top A, then to ordered eigenvalue data. Under Frobenius normalization, exact power-law spectra form a trace-normalized Cartan orbit. This orbit is a Gibbs family on ranks, a Fisher information line, and a Bures--Wasserstein curve with line element d/4d/4 times Fisher information. The main rigidity theorem is a slack-aware margin inequality: interface radial amplitude, non-backtracking slack, and signed residual variation control displacement of the fitted Cartan coordinate. In the exact-chart zero-slack case, a depth-LL budget gives exponent drift of order (logM)/L(\log M)/L; generally, slack and residual increments augment the bound. We separate scalar top-radial from full-Cartan spectral control, which also needs Bures/Hellinger residual variation. We prove approximate-power-law and metric-chart versions, converse lower bounds, Fisher--KL/Bures action estimates, and near-identity expansions for normalized residual chains. Near-identity results verify transport budgets; chart quality remains measurable. Effective rank is a spectral-energy quantile, giving finite-width power-law tail bounds and robust rank-window transition estimates. Empirical static-weight exponent profiles serve as diagnostics; full verification also requires interface budgets, slacks, and residuals for the same operator chain.
Ziran Liu, Wei Wang, Jinhao Wang +5
May 6, 2026cs.LG

Why Geometric Continuity Emerges in Deep Neural Networks: Residual Connections and Rotational Symmetry Breaking

Weight matrices in deep networks exhibit geometric continuity -- principal singular vectors of adjacent layers point in similar directions. While this property has been widely observed, its origin remains unexplained. Through experiments on toy MLPs and small transformers, we identify two mechanisms: residual connections create cross-layer gradient coherence that aligns weight updates across layers, and symmetry-breaking nonlinearities constrain all layers to a shared coordinate frame, preventing the rotation drift that would otherwise destabilize weight structure. Crucially, a nonlinear but rotation-preserving activation fails to retain continuity, isolating symmetry breaking -- not nonlinearity itself -- as the active ingredient. Activation and normalization play distinct roles: activation concentrates continuity in the leading singular direction, while normalization distributes it across multiple directions. In transformers, continuity is projection-specific: Q, K, Gate, and Up (which read from the residual stream) develop input-space (v1\mathbf{v}_1) continuity; O and Down (which write to it) develop output-space (u1\mathbf{u}_1) continuity; V alone, lacking an adjacent nonlinearity, develops only low continuity.
Kyungwon Jeong, Won-Gi Paeng, Honggyo Suh