Oh Deer, How Should I Handle This? Seasonal Priors for Selective Wildlife Annotation and Classification
Authors: Hugo Markoff, Christoph Praschl, Anton Hjalte Jørgensen, Christian Emil Mogensen, Mathias Bech Skadhauge, Sara Beery, Michael Ørsted, David C. Schedl
Organizations: Aalborg University, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg, Denmark · University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Hagenberg, Austria · Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
Abstract
Fine-grained wildlife classification in aerial imagery is limited not only by model performance, but also by unreliable labels: animals occupy few pixels, key visual cues vary seasonally, and modality-specific evidence can be ambiguous. We study adult-male identification in red deer (Cervus elaphus), where the antler cycle defines predictable windows of reliable evidence for both annotation and prediction. Using 7,295 RGB-only, thermal-only, and matched RGB+thermal crop sets from low-altitude UAV surveys, labeled by three annotators, we show that seasonal structure links (I) annotation quality, (II) downstream classification, and (III) selective prediction. Matched RGB+thermal review resolves more samples than either single modality, recovering majority-male labels otherwise missed by RGB or thermal alone, in human-based as well as model-based classification. Months with high annotator abstention also show lower classifier confidence, and soft seasonal priors mainly benefit the season-limited thermal view. Uncertainty-band abstention further raises covered accuracy to 98.9%, though at reduced coverage and with deferral that falls disproportionately on males. Overall, a biologically grounded seasonal calendar predicts where annotation and prediction are unreliable, and can guide both annotation protocol design and modality weighting.
Aerial drone surveys increasingly support wildlife population estimation, yet a useful census is more than a count: population dynamics are defined by species composition, sex ratios and age structure, that is, by which species are present and how a herd splits into adult males, adult females and juveniles. We use red deer (Cervus elaphus) as a test case, because managers act on these dynamics and because the visible cue defining adult males, the antlers, is seasonally variable. Surveys are flown nadir, high enough not to disturb the animals, so each deer occupies only a small, low-resolution patch. The two recording modalities fail in opposite conditions: in color a deer under canopy blends into the ground, while in thermal it becomes a bright blob that loses fine detail. Rather than trust either modality alone, we fuse them at every stage using self-supervised DINOv3 features. Our pipeline tracks animals in both modalities, treats an animal as confirmed only when the two cameras agree, keeps only the clear, non-occluded frames, and assigns species and sex by a vote across them; life stage is read separately from geo-referenced body size, since at survey resolution a juvenile often only differs from an adult female in size. Across four flights spanning the antler season the fused pipeline correctly classifies 25 of the 26 detected individuals (7 of 8 adult males, all 16 adult females and 2 juveniles), against 20 of 26 for either sensor alone. Multimodal species classification reaches 96.0%, while for sex classification fusing the two sensors matters most: the combined RGB+thermal model is the most robust across environments and seasons. Automating the demographic classification turns a drone flight from a count into a repeatable reading of herd structure, so the sex ratios and age structure that managers already act on can be gathered as often as a survey can be flown.
Scaling wildlife monitoring for real-world conservation deployments requires automated analysis of smart sensors that operate under severe annotation scarcity. We propose leveraging expert knowledge of species activity patterns as an annotation-free validation signal for multimodal monitoring pipelines. We operationalize agreement as the alignment of independently derived hourly activity curves both with each other and with published behavioral priors-a three-way convergence that rules out shared-data confounds and dataset-internal correlation as alternative explanations. Our vision pipeline combines zero-shot species detection via BioCLIP 2, sliced inference to handle deployment-constrained camera positioning, and geometry-based geographic localization from camera trap imagery. Our acoustic pipeline detects species vocalizations via a fine-tuned classifier. We validate the pipeline on a breeding herd of Milu deer and demonstrate that both modalities independently recover activity patterns consistent with known deer behavioral ecology with minimal manual annotation. The framework applies to species detectable in both visual and acoustic modalities for which behavioral priors are documented in the literature, suggesting a practical path toward self-validating wildlife-monitoring pipelines at conservation scale.
Bharath Pillai, Varun Viswapriyan, Christopher Stewart +2
Camera traps have become a common tool for wildlife monitoring efforts in ecological research and biodiversity conservation. Wildlife classification models have benefited from the increase in wildlife visual data. These models reach high levels of accuracy on curated, high-quality datasets. However, their performance remains sensitive to real-world environmental constraints. They often produce inconsistent predictions when performing inference on temporally coherent sequences. The predicted label for a single individual shifts rapidly between frames. This study exploits the temporal nature of camera-trap data to augment inferred predictions from a wildlife classification model. Specifically, we adopt several standard Multi-Object Tracking (MOT) models to link detections across consecutive frames. The curated trajectories are used to fuse the softmax class probabilities. The fused probability score produces a single consensus class label estimate that overrides misclassifications caused by noise. The analysis of the experimental results shows that our proposed strategy improves over a standalone classifier over all datasets and for each metric. Specifically, the best-performing MOT models gain a weighted F1-Score of 5.1%, 3.1% and 2.0% over the classifier across three MOT datasets.
Mufhumudzi Muthivhi, Jiahao Huo, Fredrik Gustafsson +1