Motion priors improve reinforcement learning for physics-based humanoid tracking, but temporal priors require ordered motion clips, while pose priors provide limited guidance for policy-induced pose transitions. We present Pose Flow Matching for Humanoid Robots (PFM-HR), a reusable flow matching prior trained directly on large scale unordered pose data. PFM-HR introduces the Pose Geometry Score (PGS), which quantifies how joint coordinate changes during rollouts align with the local geometry of pose variation captured by the prior. Using PGS to modulate the tracking reward guides policy exploration toward structured pose changes while keeping the prior frozen across tracking tasks. Experiments demonstrate that PFM-HR improves both single motion and general motion tracking, especially for highly dynamic motions.
Humanoid motion tracking is central to teleoperation and whole-body imitation, yet evaluation often disagrees with what people perceive in videos. Kinematic errors average per-frame pose differences but miss the physical artifacts that matter most, particularly unstable support and incorrect contacts such as foot skating and mistimed touch-downs. Meanwhile, widely used test suites are small and lack the diversity needed to stress contact-rich, long-horizon behaviors. We introduce HumanTracker to make humanoid tracking evaluation both perceptually aligned and scalable. The HumanTracker benchmark contains approximately 153 hours of optical motion trajectories from multiple professional performers, organized into four motion families with text labels for fine-grained diagnosis. We further propose HumanScore, a preference-aligned metric trained on 12K motion pairs containing 24K motions. Across representative state-of-the-art trackers, HumanScore better predicts human preferences and reveals contact and stability failures that kinematic metrics often miss.
Reinforcement learning has become the prevailing approach to humanoid locomotion control: policies transfer reliably from simulation to hardware and recover gracefully from disturbances. Motion quality, however, still lags behind: task-only rewards often converge to stiff, asymmetric gaits, while motion imitation methods improve appearance but become more sensitive to external disturbances because reference signals can oppose the transient poses needed to regain balance. We propose Predictive Style Matching, in which an offline predictor maps the robot's lower-body state history and velocity commands to interpretable upper-body joint and gait targets that shape the rewards during training. Because the targets are state-conditioned rather than time-indexed and the predictor is used only at training time, the deployed controller inherits the proprioceptive interface and inference cost of a task-only RL baseline. On the Unitree G1, in both simulation and hardware, PSM reduces upper-body style error by roughly an order of magnitude over task-only RL while preserving its fall-recovery rate, whereas the motion-imitation baseline attains the lowest style error but fails to recover from disturbances about five times as often.
Learning a motion prior requires a reward that guides a policy from its current behavior toward demonstrated motion. Adversarial Motion Priors (AMP) provide such a reward with a discriminator. However, adversarial objectives can become uninformative when policy and expert supports are far apart. A naive use of optimal transport (OT) averages matched expert successors into a barycentric target. Averaging across gait phases can weaken the target's joint motion. We introduce Flow-Matched Motion Priors (FMP), an online scalar reward learned from paths connecting current rollout histories to an expert motion bank. Entropic OT supplies the coupling. Before each policy update, we train a neural potential with flow matching (FM) along the rollout-to-expert paths, endpoint-gradient supervision, and relative-value calibration. The actor receives only physical observations and the reward remains a scalar, as in AMP. Controlled reward-model experiments show substantially better generalization beyond the fitting rollout than value-only or endpoint-only fitting. On Unitree G1, matched 50-million-transition experiments compare FMP with AMP, a barycentric OT reward, and nested ablations under demonstration and fixed-pose initialization. FMP produces stable forward walking at 0.727 m/s from demonstration resets and 0.338 m/s from a fixed default pose. In the fixed-pose condition, it incurs 129 falls versus 243 for the endpoint-only control. Against a static score-gradient teacher, dynamic FM reduces score-increment error at interpolation fractions 0.25 and 0.50 while using 29% less offline fitting time.