Behaviorally Adaptive Visual Diversion for Inclusive and Resilient Digital Assessment Delivery

Contemporary online assessment systems rely primarily on browser lockdown, webcam monitoring, and behavioural analytics, yet remain vulnerable to attacks that extract the assessment content itself through screenshots, screen sharing, optical character recognition, and automated scraping. This paper extends the Multi-dimensional Spatio-Temporal Context Camouflaging Model (MSCCM) within the MARS (Multi-modal Assessment Resilience Suite) by introducing the Multi-Layer Context Camouflaging Theory (MCCT), a mathematical framework that protects rendered assessment content through semantic superposition. Authentic assessment content and synthetically generated camouflage are represented as a unified rendering while remaining recoverable only by legitimate candidates. The framework models the adversarial extraction process through an explicit extraction-channel operator and develops six coupled constructs: the Context Inversion Operator, Contextual Lamination Operator, Separation Channel, Human Readability Functional, Computational Ambiguity Functional, and Context Camouflage Tensor. Computational ambiguity is formulated using conditional entropy, yielding a closed-form expression that quantifies uncertainty during unauthorized extraction, while legitimate recovery is guaranteed through an exact filtering identity. We further establish theoretical properties governing ambiguity, camouflage density, semantic preservation, multi-observation leakage, and temporal multiplexing, and present a rendering algorithm with computational complexity and a pre-registered evaluation protocol. MCCT provides a mathematically rigorous foundation for behaviorally adaptive, accessibility-aware, and computationally resilient digital assessment by securing rendered assessment content while preserving readability for legitimate users.

Assistive agents for Blind and Visually Impaired (BVI) users require accessibility alignment as a first-class design objective. Despite rapid progress in agentic AI, most systems are designed and evaluated under assumptions of sighted interaction, low-cost verification, and tolerable trial-and-error, leading to systematic failures in assistive scenarios that cannot be resolved by model scaling or post-hoc interface adaptations alone. Drawing on an analysis of 778 assistance task instances from prior work, we show that current agentic AI remain prone to failure in assistive scenarios due to mismatches between sighted-user design assumptions and the verification, risk, and interaction constraints faced by BVI users. We argue that accessibility should be treated as an alignment problem rather than a peripheral usability concern. To this end, we introduce accessibility alignment and propose a lifecycle-oriented design pipeline for accessibility-aligned assistive agents, spanning user research, system design, deployment and post-deployment iteration. We conclude that BVI-centered assistive tasks provide a critical stress test for agentic AI and motivate a broader shift toward inclusive agent design.

Modern web applications increasingly expose accessibility barriers through interaction flows rather than static page snapshots. Keyboard traps, focus loss, modal leakage, delayed status updates, dynamic controls, and changing page regions often become observable only after users perform concrete actions. These behaviors are directly related to dynamic WCAG criteria, yet they remain difficult to automate because their assessment depends on runtime interaction evidence and is still commonly performed through manual inspection. We present Flow-A11y, a flow-aware accessibility testing system for interaction-dependent WCAG criteria. Given a target page and a natural-language scenario, Flow-A11y executes the flow in a real browser, records an ordered runtime trace, constructs criterion-specific evidence packets, gates unsupported judgments, and emits auditable findings grounded in resolvable runtime evidence. Evaluated on 19 real public-web scenarios covering 45 dynamic WCAG criteria, Flow-A11y achieves over ten times higher oracle agreement than a generic browser-agent audit, while its evidence-calibration layer improves fail precision from 23.5% to 41.4% and eliminates invalid evidence references. These results show that runtime traces provide actionable evidence for assessing interaction-dependent accessibility behavior. They demonstrate a practical path toward automating dynamic WCAG criteria that page-level scanners cannot assess and that have traditionally required manual evaluation.