Neuro-Symbolic Closed-Loop Control of Laser Powder Bed Fusion with an In-Loop Ontology

This work presents a knowledge-driven decision-support system that integrates structured defect knowledge with LLM-based reasoning to provide explainable defect diagnosis and mitigation guidance in manufacturing, using LPBF as a representative, safety-critical case study. The proposed ontology-integrated LLM-based decision support system for LPBF defect analysis and mitigation guidance is built on a knowledge base containing 27 known LPBF defect types organized into hierarchical categories and causal relationships. The developed system supports fuzzy natural language queries for systematic knowledge retrieval, literature-supported explanation of defects, and guidance on defect causes and mitigation strategies derived from encoded process knowledge. Furthermore, a multimodal image-assessment module based on foundation models enables descriptor-guided interpretation of representative microscopic defect images through semantic alignment scoring. The proposed framework was evaluated through qualitative comparisons with general-purpose vision-language models, an ablation study, and an inter-rater reliability analysis. Evaluation on the literature-derived dataset showed that the fully integrated configuration outperformed the other three evaluated system configurations, achieving a macro-average F1 score of 0.808. Additionally, inter-rater reliability analysis using Cohen's kappa indicated substantial agreement between the model outputs and the literature-derived reference labels. These findings suggest that ontology-guided knowledge representation can improve the consistency, interpretability, and practical usefulness of LLM-assisted LPBF defect analysis.

This work investigates the implementation of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) for real-time monitoring in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing. We developed a binary image classification framework for distinguishing normal and abnormal melt pool images using a balanced dataset of 1,200 images collected from Nickel superalloy 625 on the NIST AMMT platform. The study evaluates accuracy and inference time based on control requirements and hardware limitations of open-architecture LPBF machines. We benchmark three transfer learning architectures (ResNet50, EfficientNetB0, and MobileNetV2) against two Random Forest approaches: one trained on EfficientNetB0 feature embeddings (hybrid) and one trained on raw pixel features (baseline). Images are stratified into 80/20 train-test splits, with a further 90/10 validation split on the training set, and undergo standardized resizing, normalization, and label-preserving data augmentation to emulate realistic process variability. Each model is evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), along with training time, inference latency, and CPU & GPU usage to capture deployability constraints relevant to factory-floor monitoring. The hybrid EfficientNetB0-plus-Random Forest approach achieves the best performance on the held-out test set, with an F1 score of 0.9451, accuracy of 0.9458, and AUC of 0.9904, while maintaining sub-millisecond per-image inference (1.15 ms). In contrast, purely deep learning models exhibit significantly higher inference times with lower accuracy. These results demonstrate that combining pre-trained convolutional features with classical ensemble methods provides a robust, computationally efficient route to real-time melt pool anomaly detection in data-limited additive manufacturing environments.

Reliable prediction of crystallographic texture in laser powder bed fusion is critical for linking process conditions with anisotropic response and for qualification. However, black-box models may fail under shift and cannot distinguish weak data support from loss of physical validity. This study develops a two-stage physics-based model for <001> || BD (build direction) texture in Inconel 718. Stage 1 maps process variables to melting mode and melt pool geometry. Stage 2 predicts texture by combining an empirical physics model with a random-forest residual model. A k-nearest-neighbor weight attenuates residual corrections for poorly supported queries, while a study-specific areal beam-power-density criterion withholds predictions outside the adopted conduction envelope. Conformal intervals are evaluated on the retained physics-valid set, and SHAP and Sobol analyses assess residual sensitivity. Under a controlled leave-one-defocus-out evaluation, the physics anchor achieved R^2 = 0.778, against -0.001 for the black-box model and 0.750 for the gated hybrid. Under leave-one-group-out cross-validation, the gated hybrid reached R^2 = 0.592 against 0.538 for the black-box model. Retained-set coverage was 92.9% at a mean full width of 3.65 multiples of a uniform distribution (MUD) under grouped cross-validation and 100% at a width of 3.21 MUD under transfer to a withheld +80 mm defocus regime. An illustrative mapping produced a retained BD elastic-modulus span of 127-187 GPa. On nine conditions from a separately built sample set, the framework withheld three, attenuated three, and matched the measured ordering for the rest. Separating data applicability, physics validity, and predictive uncertainty into distinct decisions lets the framework transfer where an unconstrained model does not, and withhold predictions where no model class performs adequately.