cs.ROAug 6, 2026

Design and Evaluation of a Touchscreen-Based Teleoperation Interface for Robotic Manipulators

Authors: Juan José García CárdenasAlperen KenanHamidreza RaeiPaul BremnerManuel GiulianiArash AjoudaniAdriana Tapus

Abstract

Intuitive teleoperation interfaces are crucial for the safe and effective operation of robotic manipulators in challenging environments. In the nuclear industry, surface contact tasks such as swab sampling require precise path and force tracking, obstacle avoidance, and sustained operator attention, which conventional joystick interfaces struggle to support effectively. This study designs and evaluates a novel touchscreen teleoperation interface that maps continuous finger movements directly to robotic manipulator motions, provides finer velocity control, and integrates control with visualization, enabling more natural, precise, and intuitive surface interaction than conventional controllers. A comparative user study with 20 participants evaluated task performance and workload using the proposed touchscreen, a conventional joystick, and a single-click autonomous mode. Tasks simulated realistic surface manipulation using a Franka Emika Panda arm, remotely controlled from another country. Kinematic, physiological, and behavioral data were recorded to comprehensively assess task performance, cognitive load, and operator trust across each control condition. Participants completed teleoperation tasks more efficiently and accurately with the touchscreen interface, achieving a 53.5% reduction in completion time (median: 2.50 vs. 5.38 min), higher in-area coverage on the sinusoidal path (90.7% vs. 84.1%), and lower overshoot on both path geometries compared with the joystick. Cognitive load, quantified via NASA-TLX (0-100), decreased from joystick to touchscreen (mean TLX 52 to 43; -9 points, -17.3%) and was lowest under the autonomous one-click mode (31; -21 points vs. joystick, -40.4%; -12 vs. touchscreen, -27.9%). This research presents an easy-to-implement touchscreen interface that improves performance in teleoperated surface tasks while reducing cognitive load.

Explore similar work

Sep 8, 2026cs.RO

A Controlled Comparison of Manual and Teleoperated Intraocular Instrument Motion for an Input Device

Input devices for robotic microsurgery are frequently described as preserving the surgeon's trained technique, but the claim is rarely measured. We compared manual and teleoperated intraocular instrument motion with the trocar constraint, the instrument, the eye model and the tracking source common to both conditions, so that the control interface was the only factor varied. Prior comparisons cannot hold the instrument fixed, because a robotic instrument is not the tool used manually. Sixteen participants performed a navigation task on a commercial ophthalmic simulator by hand and through a three-degree-of-freedom input device commanding a five-joint robot. Task outcome was equal but at ceiling: every participant acquired all five targets under both interfaces with no retinal or lens injury. Execution differed on every measure. Teleoperated trials took three times as long at a quarter of the median speed, covered less than half the angular working range, and were broken into 3.5 times as many separate movements. Completion time and movement fragmentation improved substantially across four trials of practice and had not plateaued; the measures set by the configured rate ceiling and joint limit changed the least. Finger activity doubled and pinch variability tripled, so reducing instrument degrees of freedom redistributed manual effort rather than reducing it. The interface preserves the outcome and reshapes the execution.
Korab Hoxha, Mirza Imamovic, Angelo Henriques +1
Mar 26, 2026cs.RO

Visualizing Impedance Control in Augmented Reality for Teleoperation: Design and User Evaluation

Teleoperation for contact-rich manipulation remains challenging, especially when using low-cost, motion-only interfaces that provide no haptic feedback. Virtual reality controllers enable intuitive motion control but do not allow operators to directly perceive or regulate contact forces, limiting task performance. To address this, we propose an augmented reality (AR) visualization of the impedance controller's target pose and its displacement from each robot end effector. This visualization conveys the forces generated by the controller, providing operators with intuitive, real-time feedback without expensive haptic hardware. We evaluate the design in a dual-arm manipulation study with 17 participants who repeatedly reposition a box with and without the AR visualization. Results show that AR visualization reduces completion time by 24% for force-critical lifting tasks, with no significant effect on sliding tasks where precise force control is less critical. These findings indicate that making the impedance target visible through AR is a viable approach to improve human-robot interaction for contact-rich teleoperation.
Gijs van den Brandt, Femke van Beek, Elena Torta
Jul 8, 2026cs.RO

Manual, Joystick, or Haptic Control? An In Vitro Comparison of Navigation Strategies for Robotic Interventional Neuroradiology Procedures

Objective: To evaluate robotic controller interfaces for interventional neuroradiology procedures in-vitro incorporating a force-sensing platform to assess safety. Methods: A custom endovascular robot, device-mimicking controller, and sensorized neurovascular phantom were developed. Ten interventional neuroradiologists (4 novices, 6 experts) performed simulated navigations using four control modalities: device-mimicking controllers with and without haptic feedback, joystick-based input, and manual navigation. Navigation time, peak vessel-wall forces, incorrect catheterisations, and prolapse events were assessed, alongside user analyses. Results: Manual navigation was fastest (mean 47.7 s) compared to haptic-on (248.7 s), haptic-off (314.7 s), and joystick (392.6 s) modalities (p<0.001). Regardless of controller type, vessel-wall forces were below the 0.70 N puncture threshold; therefore all modalities were considered safe. Joystick produced significantly more prolapse events than manual control (1.56 vs 0.13; p=0.018). Operator experience was relevant to performance: experts made fewer incorrect catheterisations than novices (0.25 vs 0.62; p=0.035) and applied less vessel-wall force (p<0.0005); these effects were sustained across controllers but accentuated when haptics were on. Users perceived haptic on and haptic off as similarly intuitive, and more intuitive than joystick (p=0.033). Conclusion: Device-mimicking robotic controllers outperform joystick interfaces on most metrics; haptic feedback shows promising but non-significant performance benefits.
Benjamin Jackson, Nikola Fischer, Harry Robershaw +16