Is SwiGLU's Open Positive Tail Necessary? Evidence from Closed-Tail Gating with MemGLU

We study post-training W4A4 quantization in a controlled 300M-parameter SwiGLU decoder-only language model trained on 5B tokens of FineWeb-Edu, and ask which input-activation sites dominate the error. Naive round-to-nearest W4A4 collapses validation perplexity from FP16 23.6 to 1727. A simple residual-axis training-time intervention -- Depth Registers with a register-magnitude hinge loss (DR+sink) -- reduces this to 119 (about 14x) at matched FP16 PPL and matched zero-shot capacity, and composes with SmoothQuant to 39.9 PPL. The residual ~2 PPL gap to FP16 is the diagnostic core. We decompose W4A4 damage by input-activation site: the five trainable linears in a SwiGLU block split into residual-axis readers (qkv, w1, w3) and block-internal generators (o_proj, w2). Elementary norm arguments show residual-axis magnitude control bounds readers tightly but leaves w2's bilinear input bounded only by the trivial product of factor bounds; empirically, DR+sink collapses reader kurtosis while leaving generators essentially unchanged, and the reader-rescued W4A4 residue is flat at ~0.28 nats across three matched checkpoints with Delta-remove(w2) dominating. We present DR+sink as a training-time probe rather than a deployment proposal: a post-hoc alternative (Per-Linear QuaRot) nearly matches it on the reader axis. Full QuaRot -- adding online per-head value Hadamard plus online w2-input rotation -- does not close the gap either, directly testing the prediction that orthogonal rotation cannot bound the bilinear SwiGLU tail. Claims are specific to our 300M, 5B-token, single-seed setting, and our experiments do not isolate the partition from the hinge.

Gated Linear Units (GLU) and their variants are widely adopted in modern open-source large language model architectures and consistently outperform their non-gated counterparts, yet the underlying reasons for this advantage remain unclear. In this work, we study GLU by analyzing two-layer networks in the neural tangent kernel (NTK) regime. Our analysis reveals that the GLU structure reshapes the NTK spectrum, leading to a smaller condition number and a more compact eigenvalue distribution. Building on this finding, we further analyze the resulting training dynamics and show how the reshaped spectrum leads to faster convergence of GLU models, including a characteristic loss-crossing phenomenon observed between GLU and non-GLU models. Finally, we empirically observe that GLU has limited impact in reducing the generalization gap on various models, including ViT and GPT-2, suggesting that its primary benefit lies in accelerating optimization rather than reducing the generalization gap. The code is available at: https://github.com/Zemdalk/GLU-NTK.

Feed-forward networks (FFNs) dominate memory traffic and computation in large language model (LLM) inference, making them a primary target for activation sparsification. However, existing training-free methods suffer substantial model-quality degradation at high sparsity due to limitations in their channel-selection strategies. We observe that the SwiGLU intermediate state provides a highly effective channel-selection signal, but obtaining it requires costly dense computation. To address this, we present \emph{Prox}, a two-stage training-free framework for sparse SwiGLU FFNs. Prox hinges on the key insight: sparse execution requires only the channel mask induced by the intermediate state, which can be constructed from the magnitude ranking of its entries rather than their exact values. Specifically, Stage 1 uses input sparsity and quantized proxy weights to construct a shared mask; Stage 2 computes the selected channels exactly, enabling sparse execution of all three projections. Across ten LLMs from six model families, Prox outperforms training-free baselines at all sparsity levels, achieves up to a $1.99\times$ end-to-end decoding speedup at 70% FFN sparsity, and is compatible with quantization and sparse attention.