Ghost Features and Spooky Transfer Learning for Hypercomplex-Valued Neural Networks

Complex-valued Neural Networks (CVNNs) are often motivated by domains where information is naturally encoded in magnitude and phase. Yet complex-valued inputs alone do not determine when complex arithmetic improves learning: the label signal may lie in amplitude, phase, their coupling, or a symmetry that real-valued models can also represent under suitable coordinates. We study this through a representation-first evaluation of CVNNs against Cartesian real, polar, phase-only, magnitude-only, parameter-matched real, and FLOP-matched real baselines. Across synthetic RF tasks, complex representations are useful but not universally superior. PSK-only tasks favor phase-aware and complex-valued models, QAM-only tasks favor magnitude-based models, mixed PSK+QAM gives only a small complex-valued advantage, and unseen carrier-phase rotations break coordinate-dependent models without augmentation. Similar patterns appear beyond RF: in quantum-wavefunction prediction, momentum is invisible to $|ψ|$ but recoverable from phase, while EEG analytic-signal experiments show that phase locking, amplitude bursts, and phase-amplitude coupling each favor different coordinate views. We also identify a benchmarking artifact on RadioML 2018.01A. Under matched-shared-trial selection, a CReLU complex model exceeds the best real baseline by 22.94 PP; under independent per-family tuning on the same data and 16-trial search space, the gap collapses to 2.46 PP. Gradient analysis traces the inflated gap to high-learning-rate first-step instability in real baselines, while complex parameter coupling distributes the loss signal more robustly. A learning-rate $\times$ activation factorial confirms the failure is primarily hyperparameter-driven. Overall, CVNNs are best viewed as structured inductive biases whose gains depend on representation, symmetry, and optimization, not as universally superior architectures.

Complex-Valued Neural Networks (CVNNs) have significant advantages in handling tasks that involve complex numbers. However, existing CVNNs are unable to quantify predictive uncertainty. We propose, for the first time, dropout-based Bayesian Complex-Valued Neural Networks (BayesCVNNs) to enable uncertainty quantification for complex-valued applications, exhibiting broad applicability and efficiency for hardware implementation due to modularity. Furthermore, as the dual-part nature of complex values significantly broadens the design space and enables novel configurations based on layer-mixing and part-mixing, we introduce an automated search approach to effectively identify optimal configurations for both real and imaginary components. To facilitate deployment, we present a framework that generates customized FPGA-based accelerators for BayesCVNNs, leveraging a set of optimized building blocks. Experiments demonstrate the best configuration can be effectively found via the automated search, attaining higher performance with lower hardware costs compared with manually crafted models. The optimized accelerators achieve approximately 4.5x and 13x speedups on different models with less than 10% power consumption compared to GPU implementations, and outperform existing work in both algorithm and hardware aspects. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/zehuanzhang/BayesCVNN.git.

Complex-valued neural networks (CVNNs) are increasingly adopted for complex-valued data; however, they are often trained with first-order optimizers inherited from the real-valued case. The efficiency of these methods depends largely on the step size, and their step-size rules ignore the angular information available in the complex plane. We address step-size adaptation in the complex domain by introducing AURA (Angular Update Rate Adaptation), a per-parameter step-size adaptation that can be added on top of any first-order optimizer, and removed from it, without altering its update direction. AURA measures the agreement between consecutive updates of each complex parameter, in length, alignment, and sense of rotation, and enlarges the step when they are consistent and reduces it when they are not. It requires no additional gradient evaluations and only inexpensive vector operations per step. We combine AURA with Adam and Muon and compare the resulting methods with well-known first-order optimizers on four test cases of increasing complexity, ranging from the approximation of scalar complex functions to physics-informed training. Fully connected neural networks are used throughout this work. All hyperparameters other than the step size are held fixed across test cases; for one case, we also tune the hyperparameters of each optimizer under the same budget. Our empirical tests show that AURA improves the convergence of its base optimizer in most cases with a small per-step overhead, and we identify the conditions under which it fails to do so.