Intermodal freight networks face growing disruption risk from climate extremes that degrade multiple corridors simultaneously. To address this, we formulate freight routing as a Dec-POMDP with per-shipment action granularity and train Independent PPO (IPPO) under Centralized Training with Decentralized Execution, comparing against two heuristic baselines with privileged state access on a 15-hub network under hurricane disruption. Across 30 matched episodes, no single policy dominates: IPPO achieves the highest throughput (+12.7%) and delivery rate while a capacity-aware heuristic leads on Resilience Index (RI) and delay. Under demand surge (2.9:1 capacity ratio), IPPO's RI advantage grows to +6.4%, suggesting learned routing is most valuable when capacity is scarce. A Multi-Agent PPO (MAPPO) variant collapses under train-eval queue mismatch (RI=0.811); retraining recovers RI to 1.018 but IPPO still leads on throughput, pointing to residual limitations in centralized critics under per-shipment dispatch.
In recent years, the growing complexity of last-mile pickup operations has increased the need for fast and accurate decision-making on logistics platforms. This challenge is fundamentally driven by two key and tightly coupled decision-making processes: order dispatching and routing. Solving them separately overlooks their interdependence, while fully end-to-end learning can be unstable and costly on large, variable-scale instances due to sparse rewards. To solve this problem, we propose an integrated optimization framework which couples a learned routing oracle with real-time dispatching heuristics. For the routing subproblem, we develop a Dynamic-Residual Graph Attention Network encoder with a Look-Ahead Courier-Personalized decoder. For the dispatching subproblem, we develop a routing-oracle-guided dispatching heuristic with local search, where the oracle provides near-optimal solutions to select candidate couriers while retaining real-time scalability. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets from Cainiao Logistics are used to test the performance of our approach, including an offline evaluation and an online rolling-horizon simulation. The experimental results show that our approach outperforms other benchmarks regarding solution quality and solving time, indicating it can effectively support logistics companies in solving real-time and large-scale last-mile pickup problems.
Inference serving systems must balance throughput and latency under bursty, heterogeneous workloads, yet the industry standard remains static batching policies that require manual tuning and cannot adapt to shifting traffic. We investigate whether reinforcement learning (RL) can learn adaptive batching and routing policies that outperform these heuristics, training REINFORCE and PPO agents on a discrete-event simulator validated against queuing theory and production traces (Azure Functions, BurstGPT). We formulate the problem as an MDP over queue state, request type and GPU availability, evaluating across standard Poisson traffic, extreme bursts, real-world traces and heterogeneous multi-GPU routing. Our central finding is a clear boundary condition for RL's value in systems problems. In single-GPU settings, a well-tuned static batching policy is already near-optimal under Poisson-like arrivals and RL offers only marginal gains (+0.1% to +1.0%). In multi-GPU heterogeneous routing, however, where fast and slow requests compete for shared resources, the agent discovers a workload-segregation policy that eliminates Head-of-Line blocking, yielding a 3.5x (348%) improvement over Round-Robin and a 48% improvement over the strongest heuristic baseline (Shortest-Queue), with 60% higher throughput and 25% lower latency while respecting SLA constraints. The policy generalizes to unseen bursty and real-world traffic despite training only on synthetic Poisson arrivals and an attention-augmented policy network converges roughly 20% faster than an MLP baseline. These results suggest RL's advantage over engineered heuristics concentrates in combinatorial, multi-resource decisions rather than single-resource temporal scheduling, a practical distinction for deciding where learned policies justify their engineering cost in production inference infrastructure.
Decentralized multi-agent path finding (MAPF) routes a team of agents on a shared grid, each acting from its own local view. The standard solution trains one shared neural policy with Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), a popular on-policy reinforcement learning algorithm. Such a policy works well on clean observations, but a small input perturbation on one agent often changes its action, which then blocks a neighbour, and the team jams. In this paper we present two training recipes that keep the same network and the same deployment loop, yet make the policy hold up under perturbed observations. The first recipe, Adv-PPO, trains the shared policy against worst-case perturbations of its own input and selects the checkpoint by performance under adversarial perturbation. The second recipe, Adv-PPO+MACER, fine-tunes that checkpoint with a small on-policy smoothness term whose gradient follows the certified radius of randomized smoothing. On POGEMA with 8x8 maps and four agents, the unprotected PPO policy reaches 95.8% clean success but only 2.5% under the strongest attack. Adv-PPO recovers worst-case success to 59.2% at one percentage point of clean cost. Adv-PPO+MACER recovers it to 77.5% +/- 6.0% across three independent seeds at less than one percentage point of clean cost. We support these numbers with per-attack curves, a certified action-stability sanity check (which measures the smoothed-policy wrapper, not the deployed argmax policy), and side-by-side rollout storyboards that show the failure mode and the fix inside one environment instance.