AgriField-40K: Adapting Vision Models to Agriculture With Efficient Continual Pretraining

Vision-language models (VLMs) show promise for agricultural classification, but zero-shot performance on disease, pest, damage, quality, and species identification remains poor, and it is unclear whether this reflects weak visual features or a failure to connect them to domain knowledge. We build a benchmark of 116 datasets, 834 classes, and 8,324 images spanning these tasks to isolate where the gap arises. Linear probing shows VLM vision encoders already encode agricultural features nearly as separable as a self-supervised DINOv3 baseline, ruling out weak visual representations as the primary bottleneck. Conditioning each model on an oracle reference description (an upper bound on its parametric knowledge) closes most of the gap left by an unaided lower bound, showing VLMs already know more about agriculture than they show. To close this gap without an oracle description at inference time, we structure test-time reasoning around a fixed, per-task diagnostic rubric: the model generates $K$ candidate responses and a Probabilistic Pivot Tournament (PPT) verifier, scored pairwise against the rubric, selects the best one. This nearly doubles judged F1 over the lower bound and matches or exceeds the upper bound on several tasks, notably pushing Gemma 4 E4B-it's disease F1 to 0.71, above its own upper bound of 0.60. However, the verifier's letter-scale confidence score has the opposite of its intended effect: filtering to its most confident predictions does not improve accuracy and correlates negatively with correctness across every model and pool size tested, so the score cannot serve as a measure of predictive uncertainty, and most of the observed gain likely comes from rubric-grounded generation rather than pairwise verification.

Visual grounding, the task of localizing objects described by natural-language expressions, is a foundational capability for agricultural AI systems, enabling applications such as selective weeding, disease monitoring, and targeted harvesting. Reliable evaluation of agricultural visual grounding remains challenging because agricultural targets are often small, repetitive, occluded, or irregularly shaped, and instructions may refer to one, many, or no objects in an image. Evaluating this capability therefore requires jointly testing localization accuracy, target-set completeness, and existence-aware abstention. To address these challenges, we introduce \textbf{AgroVG}, a multi-source benchmark that formulates agricultural grounding as generalized set prediction: given an image and a referring expression, a model must return all matching target instances or abstain when no target is present. AgroVG contains 10{,}071 annotation-grounded image-query pairs from ten source datasets across six target families: crop/weed, fruit, wheat head, pest, plant disease, and tree canopy. It supports bounding-box grounding (T1) across all six families and instance-mask grounding (T2) on sources with reliable instance-level pixel annotations, with queries covering single-target, multi-target, and target-absent regimes. AgroVG further provides task-specific protocols for box-set matching and query-level mask coverage. Zero-shot evaluation of 26 model configurations spanning closed-source MLLMs, open-source VLMs, and specialized grounding systems reveals persistent gaps: the best multi-target Set-$F_1$ reaches only 0.35, and the best positive-query mask success rate at IoU@0.75 remains below 0.17. Data and code are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AgroVG-5172/ .

Global food security and sustainable climate action increasingly rely on robust, scalable agricultural monitoring. Earth observation foundation models have emerged as powerful, label-efficient tools across general remote sensing domains, yet early attempts to deploy them for agricultural applications have yielded surprisingly poor results. We hypothesize that this performance gap stems from the extreme heterogeneity of agricultural landscapes and the inherent inability of current earth observation foundation models to adapt to task-specific nuances. In this work, we systematically evaluate two critical bottlenecks hindering the deployment of foundation models in agricultural tasks, benchmarking two earth observation foundation models, a foundation model designed for tabular data, and conventional supervised baselines across seven real-world agricultural datasets spanning yield prediction, phenology estimation, and crop classification. First, we identify a pretraining-deployment modality gap: agricultural downstream tasks frequently require diverse, non-imagery data modalities that earth observation foundation models are architecturally unequipped to ingest, while a foundation model built for tabular data handles this heterogeneity more naturally. Second, we formalize the agricultural task space across five structural axes to demonstrate why current models fail to generalize reliably, resulting in highly unstable model rankings across evaluation settings. By characterizing these structural and modal gaps, our insights highlight the friction between general-purpose architectures and specialized agricultural downstream data, providing a strategic roadmap for developing the next generation of domain-aware foundation models.