Universal or Language-Family-Specific Script Unification for Cross-Lingual Transfer? A Case Study on Turkic Languages

Multilingual language models transfer knowledge across languages through shared subword vocabulary, a mechanism that breaks down when related languages use different writing systems. Prior work addresses this via script equalization (romanization or IPA transcription), but direct comparisons are rare; the focus has been on encoder-only models, with most work adapting existing pretrained models. We systematically compare different input representations in autoregressive multilingual pretraining, comparing orthographic text, IPA, and romanization in a controlled setup across three scales (467M, 709M, and 1.03B) on eight languages in four typologically motivated pairs. Across a wide range of downstream tasks on seen and unseen languages, romanized pretraining yields the strongest cross-lingual transfer, and the advantage over text widens with scale. IPA improves over text in most settings but trails romanization. Surprisingly, finetuning a text-pretrained model on romanized data hurts performance on languages already covered by the base model, only marginally helping when the model lacks script coverage. Our results indicate that for multilingual models spanning typologically diverse scripts, to obtain maximum benefits, romanization should be treated as a core design choice applied at pretraining rather than a post hoc fix.

Cross-lingual transfer is central to low-resource machine translation, but its behavior within closely related language families remains insufficiently characterized. We study transfer among five Turkic languages; Turkish, Azerbaijani, Uzbek, Kazakh, and Kyrgyz; using pairwise transfer matrices. In this setting, each model is fine-tuned with one transfer source and evaluated on a different transfer target while the translation target remains the same. Across mT5 experiments, we find that transfer is strongest between closely related Turkic pairs, especially Turkish-Azerbaijani and Kazakh-Kyrgyz. We also show that transfer direction matters, and that the same transfer source-transfer target pair can behave differently when the translation target changes. Latinization improves BLEU and chrF in several script-mismatched settings, but its effect is not uniform across metrics. Additional analyses show that transfer sources are mostly stable across different datasets and model settings.

Cross-lingual transfer in NLP is often hindered by the ``script barrier'' where differences in writing systems inhibit transfer learning between languages. Transliteration, the process of converting the script, has emerged as a powerful technique to bridge this gap by increasing lexical overlap. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the application of transliteration in cross-lingual NLP. We present a taxonomy of key motivations to utilize transliterations in language models, and provide an overview of different approaches of incorporating transliterations as input. We analyze the evolution and effectiveness of these methods, discussing the critical trade-offs involved, and contextualize their need in modern LLMs. The review explores various settings that show how transliteration is beneficial, including handling code-mixed text, leveraging language family relatedness, and pragmatic gains in inference efficiency. Based on this analysis, we provide concrete recommendations for researchers on selecting and implementing the most appropriate transliteration strategy based on their specific language, task, and resource constraints.