From Objectives to What Models Learn: A Landau Theory of Invariant Learning

A scientific theory of deep learning, comprising learning dynamics and statistical properties of learned models, is rapidly gaining attention. One of the corner stones of this development are analytically solvable toy models, allowing for the fully tractable analysis of the learning dynamics. Here we analytically investigate such a toy model using the regularization strength as a tunable external parameter - akin to external fields in statistical physics. In previous studies, (i) an onset of learning transition was predicted analytically and (ii) it was phenomenologically/numerically established that tuning the regularization strength can result in a cascade of phase transitions. The number of those transitions was linked to the geometry of the loss landscape determined by the model complexity. Setting up a rigorous framework underpinning the previous numerical observations, our investigation reveals a precise connection between those cascades of phase transitions, learnable features and the underlying geometry. We provide analytic predictions of these phase transitions as well as tractable order parameters related to learned features. At the level of the minimal model, we connect this macroscopic perspective (that can be condensed into an effective description) to the microscopic perspective in terms of the geometry of the loss landscape characterized by the Hessian spectrum. Thus, the presented model provides a platform to explore and sharpen advances made in the scientific theory of deep learning rooted in statistical physics concepts.

Deep learning systems are known to exhibit implicit regularization (alt. implicit bias), favoring simple solutions instead of merely minimizing the loss function. In some cases, we can analytically derive the implicit regularization -- connecting it to an equivalent penalty that augments the learning objective. However, modern deep learning systems are complex, carrying modifications to the training procedure and architecture (e.g. early stopping, minibatching, dropout) whose effects are not always directly interpretable. Although estimating the resulting implicit regularization could aid theorists in algorithm design and practitioners in interpreting their hyperparameter choices, this problem has received little direct attention. It is also tractable: regularization makes weight updates deviate from loss gradients, promising a signal for identifying implicit bias. Here we provide gradient matching methods that can be used to empirically estimate the implicit regularization. Our method works on networks with known regularization, recovering popular explicit penalties like $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$. It also replicates known implicit effects, like the quadratic weight penalty induced by early stopping in gradient descent, demonstrating that it can be used to test theories of implicit regularization. Crucially, because our method is empirical, it can handle implicit regularization in arbitrary networks. We demonstrate this use by characterizing the effects of dropout in deep networks, showing implicit $\ell_2$ effects in this popular method. Our work shows that practitioners can use gradient matching to understand regularization in networks with implicit biases that are too complicated to derive analytically.

Neural networks trained by gradient descent on a smooth cost function can nevertheless learn in steps: the cost holds on long plateaus and then drops abruptly. Meanwhile, training losses instead follow smooth power laws. Variants of both behaviors occur in architectures with very different microscopic structures, which is the signature of a few relevant collective variables. We show that a symmetry fixes what those variables are: a network layer is a sum over interchangeable units, so relabeling the units leaves it unchanged; given smoothness and the condition that a unit's gradient vanish at the origin, symmetry then enforces a universal leading form for the expansion about the near-zero weights present at the start of training, the quadratic $\Tr[WW^{\top}A(x)]$, in which every architectural detail is confined to a single structure matrix" $A(x)$ that we compute for each architecture. Perceptrons, attention layers, mixtures of experts, and convolutions become one model at different $A$. Its training dynamics then close on the order parameter" $M=WW^{\top}$ and, whenever the data matrices share an eigenbasis, reduce to a Lotka--Volterra equation whose modes switch on one after another. The smaller the initial weights, the further apart the switch-on times, and the plateaus appear as a singular limit of a smooth flow; when many modes are unresolved the same events merge into a power law in training time whose exponent the theory predicts. We confirm both numerically across training methods and architectures.