Hip Energized Monopedal Hopping

Combining aerial thrust with spring-loaded hopping makes monopedal quadcopters promising for locomotion over complex terrain, but heuristic proportional-integral-derivative (PID) tuning limits coordination between active thrust and passive contact dynamics. We present a direct estimated-state-to-motor Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) policy that commands four motors without an explicit hopping state machine or low-level attitude PID. Its reward combines Energy-Manifold Shaping for mass-normalized vertical-energy tracking and apex-state anchoring with Efficiency Shaping, which uses a history-aware power estimator to penalize general power use, impose an additional airborne-power cost, and penalize airborne near-stationarity. In representative hardware runs, the PPO-based control stack reduced cycle-averaged measured electrical power by 30.7% and mean total normalized thrust by 49.8% relative to the tuned PID-based control stack, while retaining repeatable commanded-height hopping and more concentrated landings. These observations are consistent with improved use of passive dynamics and reduced measured electrical demand.

Although aerial-legged robots offer combined agility and efficiency, controlling high-speed hopping under complex hybrid dynamics is challenging. Reinforcement Learning (RL) is promising but prone to energy-inefficient "reward hacking". We propose a Dynamics-Informed RL framework for a monopedal hopping quadcopter. By embedding a target Specific Energy into the reward, we constrain the optimization to a physically viable energy manifold, ensuring stable hopping behaviour. By rewarding the phase-consistent behavior, it can encourage bio-inspired stance-phase impulse. Furthermore, penalizing the electro-mechanical power waste induces the motors generate an efficient impulse. This enables the policy to inject energy strictly during spring restitution without heuristic state machines. MuJoCo simulations validate robust height regulation and forward velocity tracking up to 2.0 m/s despite severe attitude-contact coupling. Ultimately, our approach yields a highly agile hopping gait, reducing energy consumption by 82% and 73% compared to hovering baselines and inefficiency baseline, respectively.

LIPM is everywhere in legged-locomotion control, but almost always as a modeling choice rather than as something the controller's cost actually prefers. This note tries to make that link more explicit. Working from a small centroidal OCP that penalizes the rate of angular momentum, we look at what its optimum tends to look like. Three things come out. With full-rank stance, the optimum drifts toward a pendular force pattern at a rate determined by the SVD of the moment Jacobian; the constant is set by foot-span geometry and matches the experiments to within 16%. With N=2 stance, as in trot, the friction cone introduces a lower bound on $\|\dot{H}_G\|$ that no amount of weight tuning fixes; we also see a non-smooth feasibility kink at a critical horizontal acceleration that we can write in closed form. Adding a task term that asks for a nonzero $\dot{H}_G$ moves the optimum off the pendular set in a predictable way. None of this is far from the classical ZMP/DCM picture. We test these claims on a point-mass quadruped and on the Unitree Go1 in MuJoCo (open-loop QP and a torque-level closed-loop controller), and we note where the asymptotic story stops being a good description of what the closed loop actually does.