Robust Multi-Agent Bandits with Heavy-Tailed Rewards and Information Asymmetry

The batched multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem, where rewards are collected in batches, is pivotal in applications like clinical trials. While prior work assumes light-tailed reward distributions, real-world scenarios often exhibit heavy-tailed outcomes. This paper addresses this gap by introducing robust batched bandit algorithms for heavy-tailed rewards in both multi-arm and Lipschitz settings. We uncover somewhat surprising phenomena for such problems -- heavier tails require fewer batches to achieve near-optimal regret in the instance-independent setting, as well as the Lipschitz setting. In sharp contrast, in the instance-dependent setting, the number of batches required to achieve near-optimal regret does not depend on the tail heaviness.

We study decentralized multi-player reinforcement learning in episodic tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs) under three forms of information asymmetry: (A) unobserved actions with common rewards, (B) observed actions with independent rewards, and (C) unobserved actions with independent rewards. Players cannot communicate during learning but may agree on a protocol a priori. For Problems A and B we propose \texttt{mQ-learning} and \texttt{mQ-learning-intervals}, achieving $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{H^4 S A_{\text{joint}}\, T})$ regret, where $H$ is the horizon, $S$ the state count, $T = KH$ the total steps, and $A_{\text{joint}} = \prod_{i=1}^M |\mathcal{A}_i|$ the joint action space across $M$ players. For Problem C we give \texttt{mEXC} and \texttt{mEXC-Bellman}, two-phase explore-then-commit algorithms with regret $\tilde{O}(H (S A_{\text{joint}})^{1/3} T^{2/3})$. Against the centralized joint-action benchmark, decentralized learning under information asymmetry matches the single-agent Q-learning rate of \cite{jin2018q} up to logarithmic factors. Because $A_{\text{joint}}$ grows exponentially in $M$, the bounds are most meaningful for small $M$ or small per-player action sets.

Heavy-tailed distributions arise naturally in sequential decision-making problems such as financial investment, online advertising, and network management, where rare but extreme outcomes can dominate performance. Heavy-tailed bandits model online decision-making in these settings by assuming only that rewards $X$ satisfy $\mathbb{E}[|X|^{1+ε}]\leq u$, for some tail exponent $ε\in(0,1]$ and moment bound $u<+\infty$. However, most existing regret minimization algorithms require these parameters to be known. This assumption is particularly restrictive in practice: $ε$ and $u$ govern the frequency and magnitude of rare events and are therefore precisely the quantities that are hardest to infer reliably from limited observations. Motivated by an open problem posed by Genalti and Metelli at COLT 2025, we resolve the assumption-free adaptation problem for heavy-tailed bandits and characterize the price in the regret of not knowing the tail parameters. We first study adaptation to the moment bound $u$ for a fixed tail exponent $ε$. We prove that every algorithm unaware of $u$, or of any upper bound on it, must obey a sharp trade-off between its distribution-dependent and distribution-free regret guarantees. We then introduce a scheduled-exploration algorithm that requires no knowledge of $u$ and matches the resulting adaptation frontier up to logarithmic factors. Finally, we show that the same algorithm can be instanced without knowing $ε$ by calibrating its exploration schedule to the endpoint $ε=1$. It achieves sublinear regret for every fixed $ε>0$, while no algorithm can guarantee sublinear regret uniformly over all $ε\in(0,1]$. Altogether, our results resolve the COLT open problem without additional distributional assumptions and provide a sharp characterization of the statistical cost of adapting to unknown heavy tails.