XGBoost "is all you need": the case of forecasting transmitted heat energy in District Heating Systems

Obtaining an accurate short-term forecasting for heat demand is an essential part of operating district heating networks cost-efficient and reliable. Heat consumption time series at the building level are highly dependent on exogenous variables such as outdoor temperature and individual usage patterns, making forecasting in this context a challenging task. Thus, this paper benchmarks novel Transformer-based and xLSTM architectures for short-term heat-demand forecasting. Using hourly data from 25 German buildings (2017-2025), we compare three-hour and 24-hour forecasting horizons relevant for intraday control and day-ahead scheduling. We establish a multi-building benchmark that tests whether models trained on pooled, heterogeneous building data are able to generalize across diverse building stock. The results show that the xLSTM achieves the lowest RMSE (19.88 kWh for three-hour, 21.47 kWh for 24-hour forecasts), while the Temporal Fusion Transformer attains the best MAE (9.16 kWh for three-hour forecasts). As xLSTMs and Transformers require long training times and have a huge number of trainable parameters, their sustainability remains questionable. Therefore, this paper further investigates the trade-off between predictive accuracy and computational resource demand of the evaluated forecasting models. The findings indicate that also low-parameter models like a traditional fully-connected network achieve good predictive results, highlighting that marginal accuracy gains of the novel prediction models come at substantial resource expense for this use case.

Electricity expense management presents significant challenges, as this resource is susceptible to various influencing factors. In universities, the demand for this resource is rapidly growing with institutional expansion and has a significant environmental impact. In this study, the machine learning models long short-term memory (LSTM), random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) were trained with historical consumption data from the Federal Institute of Paraná (IFPR) over the last seven years and climatic variables to forecast electricity consumption 12 months ahead. Datasets from two campuses were adopted. To improve model performance, feature selection was performed using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), and hyperparameter optimization was carried out using genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO). The results indicate that the proposed cooperative ensemble learning approach named Weaker Separator Booster (WSB) exhibited the best performance for datasets. Specifically, it achieved an sMAPE of 13.90% and MAE of 1990.87 kWh for the IFPR-Palmas Campus and an sMAPE of 18.72% and MAE of 465.02 kWh for the Coronel Vivida Campus. The SHAP analysis revealed distinct feature importance patterns across the two IFPR campuses. A commonality that emerged was the strong influence of lagged time-series values and a minimal influence of climatic variables.

Driven by the transition towards a climate-neutral energy system, accurate energy time series forecasting is critical for planning and operation. Yet, it remains largely a dataset-specific task, requiring comprehensive training data, limiting scalability, and resulting in high model development and maintenance effort. Recently, foundation models that aim to learn generalizable patterns via extensive pretraining have shown superior performance in multiple prediction tasks. Despite their success and strong potential to address challenges in energy forecasting, their application in this domain remains largely unexplored. We address this gap by presenting the Foundation Models in Energy Time Series Forecasting (FETS) benchmark. We (1) provide a structured overview of energy forecasting use cases along three main dimensions: stakeholders, attributes, and data categories; (2) collect and analyze 54 datasets across 9 data categories, guided by typical stakeholder interests; (3) benchmark foundation models against classical machine learning approaches across different forecasting settings. Foundation models consistently outperform dataset-specific optimized machine learning approaches across all settings and data categories, despite the latter having seen the full historic target data during training. In particular, covariate-informed foundation models achieve the strongest performance. Further analysis reveals a strong correlation between predictive performance and spectral entropy, performance saturation beyond a certain context length, and improved performance at higher aggregation levels such as national load, district heating, and power grid data. Overall, our findings highlight the strong potential of foundation models as scalable and generalizable forecasting solutions for the energy domain, particularly in data-constrained and privacy-sensitive settings.