LOB-ID: Evaluating Synthetic Market Data by Inception Distances

Modeling the dynamics of financial Limit Order Books (LOB) at the message level is challenging due to irregular event timing, rapid regime shifts, and the reactions of high-frequency traders to visible order flow. Previous LOB models require cumbersome data representations and lack adaptability outside their original tasks, leading us to introduce LOBERT, a general-purpose encoder-only foundation model for LOB data suitable for downstream fine-tuning. LOBERT adapts the original BERT architecture for LOB data by using a novel tokenization scheme that treats complete multi-dimensional messages as single tokens while retaining continuous representations of price, volume, and time. With these methods, LOBERT achieves leading performance in tasks such as predicting mid-price movements and next messages, while reducing the required context length compared to previous methods.

Limit order book (LOB) simulators are most useful to practitioners when they combine realistic market dynamics, computationally efficient sampling, controllable scenario generation, and the ability to generalize beyond the instruments seen during training---properties that existing agent-based and deep generative simulators provide only partially. We present \textbf{FlowLOB}, a conditional \textbf{flow}-matching generator of \textbf{LOB} trajectories, trained on multiple Hong Kong Exchange (HKEX) symbols at three sampling frequencies ($0.1$s, $1$s, $10$s) in tick-relative representation that transfers to unseen instruments. Because flow and diffusion models admit a common formulation, we train both with identical data, architecture, and budget, and sample both through the same fixed-step ODE solvers, yielding a controlled comparison of sampling efficiency and fidelity. Flow matching attains its best quality with only $10$ ODE-solver steps, whereas diffusion needs many more function evaluations to approach the same fidelity. At this efficient operating point, FlowLOB improves realism over baselines, two learned and two agent-based models, in most distributional metrics at the two finer sampling frequencies. We evaluate counterfactual controllability with a distributional test that asks whether changing a scenario condition moves the generated statistic toward the corresponding real tail regime; FlowLOB satisfies this criterion in most tested settings. Both realism and control effects transfer zero-shot on a held-out symbol. We additionally conduct ablation studies on the network architecture and the learning rate.

We study whether a scaling-law-style inference-compute frontier appears in limit order book prediction. Using FI-2010 and a suite of models ranging from small decision trees to neural LOB architectures, we find that the realized empirical frontier of predictive loss versus structural forward work is well summarized by a power law. In particular, with MLPLOB held out as an architecture family, a power-law fit to the low- and mid-compute non-MLPLOB frontier extrapolates across multiple orders of magnitude and attains $R^2=0.941$ on the excluded high-compute MLPLOB target frontier. A similar exercise in latency space gives substantially weaker results, showing that latency is not merely noisy compute. We use this gap to motivate FastBiNLOB, a dense axis-separable LOB mixer built from hardware-friendly temporal and feature mixing operations. In a five-seed experiment, FastBiNLOB exceeds the published $y_{10}$ and $y_{100}$ macro-F1 targets at notably lower latency than existing published SOTA architectures.